0
   

Cyclo, did you put the wind up Coulter yesterday?

 
 
DrewDad
 
Reply Thu 5 May, 2005 09:26 am
Another Counter-Coulter Bust

Quote:
MAY 5--Months after members of "Al Pieda" marred a campus speech by Ann Coulter, another appearance by the controversial conservative commentator has been disrupted by a protester. During a speech last night at the University of Texas in Austin, a 19-year-old UT student was busted after asking Coulter a lewd question, which he followed up with equally inappropriate hand gestures, according to the below police affidavit. The student, Ajai Raj, was arrested by campus police and hit with a misdemeanor disorderly conduct charge. The police affidavit notes that Coulter's lecture was attended by "several children under the age of ten," which probably made them particularly sensitive when Raj queried Coulter about the sexual proclivities of certain right-leaning men. Raj is pictured at right in an Austin Police Department booking photo. (1 page)
  • Topic Stats
  • Top Replies
  • Link to this Topic
Type: Discussion • Score: 0 • Views: 2,706 • Replies: 66
No top replies

 
Cycloptichorn
 
  1  
Reply Thu 5 May, 2005 09:52 am
Ha ha

Not me!

Though I do hate that beyotch

Cycloptichorn
0 Replies
 
Cycloptichorn
 
  1  
Reply Thu 5 May, 2005 10:08 am
The response, heh

http://www.dailykos.com/story/2005/5/5/11120/19514

Quote:
UT Ann Coulter Event
by voreddy
Thu May 5th, 2005 at 08:01:20 PDT

I'm sure most of you guys have heard about the kid who asked Ann Coulter a question and got arrested. Well I emailed him and he replied. Very grateful for all our support. He needs it. Anyway he sent me an essay he wrote on it. It is hysterical. And here it is in its entirety.

Diaries :: voreddy's diary :: :: Trackback ::
AJAI RAJ
04/05/05

Open Letter to Anyone Who Gives a **** About Justice

I'm writing this in response to the spectacle that occurred in the LBJ Library on Tuesday, May 3rd, 2005, when Ann Coulter, a diabolical, ignorant, but nevertheless charismatic right-wing pundit, came to speak at UT. Ms. Coulter- yes, Ms, I'd personally think such a vocal female conservative would be making Bubba a meatloaf instead of addressing a politically-minded collegiate audience, but whatever- is the author of relentlessly mendacious anti-liberal books, such as Slander: Liberal Lies About the American Right and Treason: Liberal Treachery From the Cold War to the War on Terrorism. She's famous for having an ass that stores so many lies it makes clown-car designers envious. Like her or not (and if you do, I'm surprised you can read) she's a Big ******* Deal.
The title of the front-page story covering Ms. Coulter's in the Texan was "Arrest Made at Coulter Speech". You could also have caught it on CBS or in the Austin-American Statesman. The general idea is that some jackass made a scene, and Ann Coulter was also there.
I am Ajai Raj, and I am a jackass.
In his article, which I enjoyed and commend him for, Mr. Sampath quoted the former president of the Student Events Center, the organization which arranged the event. He wrote:
"The person had been disruptive the entire event," said Matt Hardigree, former Student Events Center president. "He took the opportunity to say something lewd and offensive and then made masturbatory gestures as he exited."
And what do I have to say in rebuttal? Not a goddamn thing.
Matt Hardigree got it spot-on! From the beginning I was yelling obscenities along with my friends, roaring at Ms. Coulter's right-wing bullshit festival the way no one else had the balls to. Mr. Sampath writes in his article that (and this is my take) the protestors were told to be good all along. They were told to sit in the back and hold their signs and leave quietly. No wonder hippies get such a bad rap nowadays; protestors today might as well be ornaments on the Rightmobile. When I want someone to know I'm pissed off, I'm going to throw down and give them a good ****-ruining. I wanted to show Ms. Coulter that people are down if she wants to hold a circle-jerk, but we're not gonna do it her way. Not me, at least.
So yes, the Q&A session came around, and it was pathetic. Her slack-jawed fans got up and licked her face so she could pat them on the head- one schmuck offered to be her bodyguard, and she smiled, doubtlessly making a mental note that she wouldn't touch his nether regions if she were King Midas; liberal protestors posed well-intentioned but woefully timid questions and got shot down in a hail of ignorant shitfire from the She-Dragon. Standing in line awaiting my turn, I watched her send a moderate Republican, who had questioned the sheer incendiary magnitude of her rhetoric, walk away in tears when she tore him apart for daring to question her.
So yes, I saw my "opportunity to say something lewd and offensive." And I took it.
She had just said something about gay marriage, the typical rightwing bullshit spiel that is still convincing people that the Bible is really the Constitution. Knowing that taking the time to say something insightful, specific, or even slightly critical would get me a lame comeback and a ticket back to my seat, I realized that the only way to win this battle was to fight fire with fire. Or bullshit with bullshit. So, as reported in yesterday's Texan, I fired:
"You say that you believe in the sanctity of marriage," said Ajai Raj, an English sophomore. "How do you feel about marriages where the man does nothing but **** his wife up the ass?"
And the crowd fell silent. Ms. Coulter stood stunned atop her stage, unprepared for a jackass to say something so utterly crude and to the point. Her pompous and mean air is enough to stump questioners into timidity, I wasn't about to let her stop me. The audience members looked at me with raw disbelief; later, even friends who know me well admitted that they'd been surprised at how vulgar I'd been. The others in line for Q&A, mostly liberals, looked at me like I'd set their cause back forty years.
Did I give a ****? No. If I had a message, it's that the whole thing was a joke- hell, our whole political scene today is a ******* joke. Everyone's out to either pat themselves on the back for being right or whine about how they're being wronged without ever lifting a finger to fight for it.
So rather than dignify anyone else, I "made masturbatory gestures" as I exited. Again, bingo! I danced a jig and set my hand a-jerkin' at crotch-level, sneering for the crowd and letting them know I was ready to roll. I yelled to my friends that we were gonna split and made for the door.
Two cops approached me. I figured they were going to tell me I had to leave, so I said "You can't fire me, because I quit!"
"You're under arrest."
It was my turn to be shocked. I tried to ask them what for; saying "**** her in the ass"" at a college isn't a crime, last time I checked. They apparently mistook my inquiries for aggression, and grabbed me roughly and slammed me into the door. Within seconds the backmost two or three rows was surging forward, following the scene as the cops dragged me out the door. They yelled and chanted; my friends were more outraged than I'd ever seen any of them before. As they pushed me into the car, I heard my good friend Jeffrey Stockwell scream, "THIS ISN'T A JUSTICE SYSTEM! YOU CALL THIS PROTECTING AND SERVING?!" The crowd took up a chant at the UTPD officers: "Shame! Shame! Shame!"
Shame is ******* right. When I asked the cops why they thought I needed cuffing, they told me that they didn't even see anything that happened, they were just doing as told.
As a good friend pointed out to me, it's a scary thought that people who are given weapons and the authority to forcibly detain people can act without knowledge of a situation.
I'm writing this at 7:15 A.M. Wednesday, having recouped over a few cigarettes and some coffee after being released from jail around 3 A.M. I had a party waiting for me- twenty or so friends and supporters, who showered me with gifts such as a card, sodas, cigarettes, food, and a Blondie CD (go figure). Several civil rights-interested associations approached me, offering pro bono legal representation and showing their support.
I have no regrets. Was I jackass? Yes. Oh Christ, yes. But here's the question people ought to ask themselves. Did I deserve to be arrested? Did the cops need to rough me up for saying bad words at what was at least masquerading as an open dialogue? Do the people of Texas- hell, of America- feel that "potty mouth" belongs on the list of punishable crimes along with "aggravated assault" and "armed robbery"?
As stated in the Texan article, I am charged with Disorderly Conduct, which is a Class C Misdemeanor. Other Class C Misdemeanors include DWIs, possession of drug paraphernalia, and speeding tickets. Without getting into the justification for all of those, were my naughty words and crude hand motions as imposing a danger?
This isn't about politics anymore, however it might have come about. Either you think it's an absurd outrage or you think swearing is a crime. Trey Parker and Matt Stone are Republicans, for Christ's sake. Raise your hand if you watch South Park.
This is about drawing a line in the sand. It made me proud to see people standing up and calling bullshit when bullshit needed to be called. All politics aside, people ought to ask themselves, how far should our representatives of "justice" be allowed to go? Do the American people believe in censorship rights for the rich and famous?
I know I didn't slay the insidious evil that is Ann Coulter, but I did give her pause. She can easily go to another college or hoedown or whatever and spew her tired rhetoric without worrying about me. But I'm not the only one who feels this way. Other people will call her on her ****.
And hey, Ann, don't come back to UT. We're better than your bullshit here. And I can think of at least one jackass here who can dish it out better than you.


Not bad

Cycloptichorn
0 Replies
 
woiyo
 
  1  
Reply Thu 5 May, 2005 10:56 am
Ah, the ignorance of youth.
0 Replies
 
DrewDad
 
  1  
Reply Thu 5 May, 2005 10:57 am
Youth does not have a lock on ignorance. Nor does age have a lock on wisdom.
0 Replies
 
woiyo
 
  1  
Reply Thu 5 May, 2005 11:23 am
DrewDad wrote:
Youth does not have a lock on ignorance. Nor does age have a lock on wisdom.


This "clown" does. He got his 15 minutes of fame by being a smart a$$.
0 Replies
 
Cycloptichorn
 
  1  
Reply Thu 5 May, 2005 11:26 am
Who gives a damn about 'his fifteen minutes of fame?'

He certainly doesn't give a damn.

He said quite clearly that his only purpose was to shock her the way she likes to shock others. He didn't care if it was forwarding the argument. He didn't care how it looked, because his intention wasn't to 'make a statement' or 'put her in her place.'

Look, you can't argue with Ann Coulter over tea and crumpets. She's nothing but a hate-filled blood-sucking bitch, and if you can't deal with her on those terms, you just can't deal with her.

The fact that your party holds her up as an example should be sickening to you, Woiyo...

Cycloptichorn
0 Replies
 
DontTreadOnMe
 
  1  
Reply Thu 5 May, 2005 11:36 am
i guess he would have been better off asking how mistress ann felt about marriages where the man does nothing but make his wife milk the horse. even worse, a male horse.

most surprising that nobody feels offended or worried so over the tender innocence of all of the 10 year olds (or younger) that are being treated to the repeated video clips of the first lady's oh so humorous description of her husband's dalliance with beastiality. Laughing
0 Replies
 
sozobe
 
  1  
Reply Thu 5 May, 2005 11:48 am
I liked his essay. English majors unite!
0 Replies
 
McGentrix
 
  1  
Reply Thu 5 May, 2005 12:10 pm
So much for the liberal belief in free speech. This butt-munch took it upon himself to be nothing more than a typical representive of the neo-liberal ass clown that has permeated the left. I fail to see why you guys would defend this jerk.
0 Replies
 
woiyo
 
  1  
Reply Thu 5 May, 2005 12:12 pm
Cycloptichorn wrote:
Who gives a damn about 'his fifteen minutes of fame?'

He certainly doesn't give a damn.

He said quite clearly that his only purpose was to shock her the way she likes to shock others. He didn't care if it was forwarding the argument. He didn't care how it looked, because his intention wasn't to 'make a statement' or 'put her in her place.'

Look, you can't argue with Ann Coulter over tea and crumpets. She's nothing but a hate-filled blood-sucking bitch, and if you can't deal with her on those terms, you just can't deal with her.

The fact that your party holds her up as an example should be sickening to you, Woiyo...

Cycloptichorn


The fact that you disagree with her point of view, is no reason to disrupt the rest of the audience. That is called common courtesy, something you and your party continues to ignore.
0 Replies
 
Cycloptichorn
 
  1  
Reply Thu 5 May, 2005 12:12 pm
He has the right to free speech as well, is why.

There's nothing wrong with addressing Coulter on her level, after all.

Cycloptichorn
0 Replies
 
DontTreadOnMe
 
  1  
Reply Thu 5 May, 2005 12:15 pm
McGentrix wrote:
I fail to see why you guys would defend this jerk.


i often wonder the same thing about coulter's fans.

not meaning that i've noticed you doing that, mcg. thank god... :wink:
0 Replies
 
Cycloptichorn
 
  1  
Reply Thu 5 May, 2005 12:18 pm
Quote:
The fact that you disagree with her point of view, is no reason to disrupt the rest of the audience. That is called common courtesy, something you and your party continues to ignore.


Coulter doesn't believe in common courtesy, and she was being strongly applauded by members of the conservative audience, so why should anyone else believe in common courtesy?

Also, you seem to have a strange idea about when common courtesy is neccessary and when it isn't; odd that you have no problem with invading and mucking up a foreign country, based upon lies that were told by the Pres, but you don't want people to speak their mind at a Q&A session with Ann Coulter. Intersting.

Cycloptichorn
0 Replies
 
woiyo
 
  1  
Reply Thu 5 May, 2005 12:21 pm
Cycloptichorn wrote:
He has the right to free speech as well, is why.

There's nothing wrong with addressing Coulter on her level, after all.

Cycloptichorn


That is another typical liberal BS line.

He has NO RIGHT to disrupt anyone on that stage or in that theater.

That's why he was arrested and charged with the CRIME of disrupting the peace.

Why do you feel HE is the only one with right and not the performer or the rest of the audience??
0 Replies
 
DontTreadOnMe
 
  1  
Reply Thu 5 May, 2005 12:24 pm
woiyo wrote:
Cycloptichorn wrote:
He has the right to free speech as well, is why.

There's nothing wrong with addressing Coulter on her level, after all.

Cycloptichorn


That is another typical liberal BS line.

He has NO RIGHT to disrupt anyone on that stage or in that theater.

That's why he was arrested and charged with the CRIME of disrupting the peace.

Why do you feel HE is the only one with right and not the performer or the rest of the audience??


hahahaha! your response is the typical conservative BS line. Laughing
0 Replies
 
woiyo
 
  1  
Reply Thu 5 May, 2005 12:26 pm
DontTreadOnMe wrote:
woiyo wrote:
Cycloptichorn wrote:
He has the right to free speech as well, is why.

There's nothing wrong with addressing Coulter on her level, after all.

Cycloptichorn


That is another typical liberal BS line.

He has NO RIGHT to disrupt anyone on that stage or in that theater.

That's why he was arrested and charged with the CRIME of disrupting the peace.

Why do you feel HE is the only one with right and not the performer or the rest of the audience??


hahahaha! your response is the typical conservative BS line. Laughing


Why??? Explain yourself.
0 Replies
 
Cycloptichorn
 
  1  
Reply Thu 5 May, 2005 12:29 pm
He was asking a question during the Q&A session. What's wrong with that?

Cycloptichorn
0 Replies
 
woiyo
 
  1  
Reply Thu 5 May, 2005 12:31 pm
Cycloptichorn wrote:
He was asking a question during the Q&A session. What's wrong with that?

Cycloptichorn


Laughing Come on Cyclo. Be reasonable. I can not quote the exact "question", but be real. Laughing
0 Replies
 
Cycloptichorn
 
  1  
Reply Thu 5 May, 2005 12:34 pm
Be real about what?

He asked:

Quote:
"You say that you believe in the sanctity of marriage," said Ajai Raj, an English sophomore. "How do you feel about marriages where the man does nothing but **** his wife up the ass?"


It's a legitimate, if shocking, question. Coulter says equally shocking, if less crass, things all the time. What is your point? That she shouldn't have to take the same sh!t she deals out?

Cycloptichorn
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
  1. Forums
  2. » Cyclo, did you put the wind up Coulter yesterday?
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.09 seconds on 05/03/2024 at 10:12:03