Intelligent Design Theory: Science or Religion?

Stay vigilant fm. You are ID's best argument. Unleashing you on the USA would soon put an end to the party. How would you dress and equip your thought police? Would attending church disqualify people from the educational system?

spendi wrote,

ROFLMAO. ID has no argument; it will die on its own seed. It offers nothing, and is supported by nothing. The environment will kill it.

Imagine folks, a world run by these Charlies.

Your post doesn't respond to any of my comments, nor has any relevant content. Stay on topic, if you can, but I know it's impossible for you.

Put the retard on ignore, he can't make 1 sane sentence.

Putting Spendius on ignore would be like removing one of cicerone imposter's spices of life. It would make things bland or at the least one sided!

Not so, spendi's only purpose in any debate, is to highlight spendius, not the topic. HEs a narcissistic douche bag with vast untested depths of misogyny. He's only ever involved himself in a debate in oprder to counter the iimmediately preceeding post. Thats boring and quite predictable behavior.
Hes added nothing important so far (Several people seem to be impressed with his ability to quote unconnected symbols and authors, thats because he has a half-vast collection of google inserts to choose from.

CI talks from experience, spendi talks from a barstool.I especially love it when spendi had proposed an opinion about something hes never experienced and would try to counter what someone like CI would state. CI has years of world travel under his belt and spendi has a walk to the pub and back, with frequent visits to his bookie.

You may be impressed, many are not, I count me with the latter group. Ive got him ignored and dont miss any of his "Spice" . The meat of this discussion has been , for several hundred pages, the shallow deformed ego of spendi, not the titled topic.Thats unfair to those who dont give a rats ass about the sodden life of one confused brit who lusts after womens underwear and is oprwting under several dozen false assumptions of history and science.

BUT, thats not my problem.

I don't think rl will ever "get it." The only reason I post to respond to any of spendi's posts is simply to make him look more the fool than he is in his pub world. spendi doesn't present any content or challenge; his posts are non-issues. I do ignore most of his posts.

Hey Hex-- are you seriously telling A2K that these scientific, educational types have been arguing with a retard, who can't compose a sane sentence, on two long threads for nearly 8 years.

This one with 19,267 posts and 295,931 views and the other with 11,190 posts and 140, 522 views plus a few others with lesser figures. And this insane retard is the only poster on one side of the debate.

I may have said a few hard things about my opponents in that time but I have never said anything which insults their intelligence quite so much as you do. You call into question their compassion and social acceptability. And so gratuitously too with a blurted 11 words which stands forth as evidence of your literary capacities.

I'll have you know, my dear, that I won the A2k "Pick-Um" game two seasons in succession against 30 Americans predicting the results of the last two years football matches. And I have only played the game twice. In fact the threadmaster of the two threads here finished near the bottom of the table in both years and the most prominent of my opponents on here daren't enter the competition for fear of me pissing all over him.

I think you should take yourself off before it dawns on the silly sods exactly how insulting you have been to them and all the anonymous viewers.

Are you a water drinker? You obviously can't socialise in pubs.

rl--they hate admitting that I'm the life and soul of this party.

They lose the argument everytime a President signs off a speech and everytime they look at a dollar bill. And they can't take it.

They don't know what they would do without religion. They are not even prepared to contemplate the idea. And it is what they are arguing for. fm's last post, edited a bit, would make a funny scene in a movie.

He's had me on and off Ignore more times than Mae West did her kecks. (Assuming she wasn't kidding.)

What is so funny is that fm, Hex and ci. , on just the one page, have demonstrated that they think people cannot bear to be looked upon with displeasure or have bad things said about them.

As the inability to bear such things is, as social scientists say, a feminine characteristic, and understandably so, the simple fact of their posts can only lead to the conclusion that they are addressing themselves to a feminine audience. I assume it is the result of habit.

They wouldn't last two minutes in male intellectual company. They would bolt (i.e.Ignore). So they must never have been in such company for longer than it takes for them to run at the first sound of paper bags being popped.

Obviously I take such things as a compliment. It shows I have rattled the silly little sods. Which is my intention. I know all about resistance analysis having read my pyschology carefully. That fm is prepared to make such an effort, for him I mean, ci. and Hex making almost none at all, to say bad things about me, and put me on Ignore, is a feather in my cap. (He will soon be peeking at my posts but won't tell any of you that he has.)

I can't imagine what these three think they are doing on a science thread. Facebook is where they actually belong.

Resorting to ad hominems now, spendi? LOL You are a lost soul without much in the way of concrete ideas of your own. You must be the biggest bore at your local pub.

You know that you find a spice of humor in what he says at times and can you also admit that the last few post that he has shared are more than on topic to what was recently talked about and well thought out?

Spendius where did you get these numbers from?

My bad I am kind of slow witted at times!

Since when is the truth an ad hom?

When you can only say,

It doesn't even address the issue being discussed; and resort to implications that are totally false. "Feminine audience" is nowhere suggested or implied. Only you can arrive at such ridiculous conclusions. That's an ad hominem, because you are attacking the messenger, and not the topic.

It is actually you who do a fool's errand, in trying to make him look like a fool, as spendi will never comprehend it, nor care for it if he indeed would understand it.

It's a fool's errand that provides me with some comic relief on a regular basis. It has entertainment value to me.

You love it ci.

The whole evolution argument is part of the feminist agenda. And the homosexual agenda. And the abortion agenda. And the media agenda. And the legal profession's agenda. And the pseudo-scientific's agenda. And the trouble maker's agenda. And the totalitarian agenda. And the eugenic agenda. And the atheist agenda. They have all exposed themselves to view. They have, to use Norman Mailer's lovely phrase, "popped out".

They think we don't know that the science is the last thing on their mind. They even limit their definition of science to exclude any science which contradicts them.

With a coalition like that it is astounding how little headway your lot are making. And with a Democratic President in power too. You're ridiculous. And profoundly misogynistic.