97
   

Intelligent Design Theory: Science or Religion?

 
 
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Wed 20 Feb, 2008 02:55 pm
No, spendi. I was responding to "Have you AIDs-ers tried counting up the questions you have failed to answer?"

How many?
0 Replies
 
spendius
 
  1  
Wed 20 Feb, 2008 03:24 pm
I can't guess. 500 maybe.

AIDs-ers have not answered a single pertinent question of mine and have either ignored them or declared them not pertinent for diplomatic reasons.

Christianity is in the business of controlling biological impulses and without such control there is no hope for mankind.

All the negative aspects of history which you AIDs-ers jump all over at every opporunity are due to the biological impulses and not to the core Christian values of love, forebearance and humility which you are engaged in destroying because of some tiny bee buzzing around in your tiny bonnets.

And the Christian control, weak as it now is, has been scientifically designed. The secular is 100% biological.

Our science of infinite space is a branch of ID. If you AIDs-ers have your way it will become a branch of biology with the impulses set free.

Your whole way of life is down to the persecuted Christians of the early years. Every action and thought you undertake, even what you find "sexy", is indebted to them and without the Romans eventually realising, after 7 or 8 hundred years of unmitigated horrorshow, the value of Christian teaching you would still be grubbing around in the muck.
0 Replies
 
spendius
 
  1  
Wed 20 Feb, 2008 03:28 pm
Quote:
The secular is 100% biological.


And 100% true.

And 100% no ****ing good.
0 Replies
 
farmerman
 
  1  
Wed 20 Feb, 2008 04:06 pm
with garbage like
Quote:
Our science of infinite space is a branch of ID. If you AIDs-ers have your way it will become a branch of biology with the impulses set free.


or
Quote:
And the Christian control, weak as it now is, has been scientifically designed. The secular is 100% biological


or
Quote:
What difference does it make to "science" what the Discovery Institute's sound bites are or any of the banal statements coming out of Florida or off the fingertips of AIDs-ers on here.


or
Quote:
I don't think I have ever met bigoted, arrogant ignorance with a defensive shell wrap-around quite so thick as I have found on this so called science thread in my entire life. I have actually been shocked by it.


why should anyone with a lick of sense waste any time on spendis fevered questions. HEs a simple contrarian who has no idea of what hes trying to say and whos only impressed with his own inanity that he really doesnt care what others think. Too bad, he shares more with chimps than mere genetic similarities.
0 Replies
 
spendius
 
  1  
Wed 20 Feb, 2008 04:26 pm
All meaningless assertions I'm afraid fm.

"Duff" is good enough and fits better with the conservation of energy theory. Are you stumped again? Your premiss was "garbage". A flat out ignorant assertion. Demonstrate why please. It is a science thread not a revivalist meeting. Your concluding pop-eyed rant depends entirely on it being true. When your assertions become truth we really are in the ****. I imagine the DOW would bong when it hit the bottom.

The insertion of "theory" into the Florida standards is a humiliating defeat for AIDs-ers. And they don't even seem to know it.


I think Mr Obama's growing appeal is biologically derived. The damp seat syndrome. The viscera.

It can't be any policies or anything trivial like that.
0 Replies
 
JTT
 
  1  
Wed 20 Feb, 2008 06:22 pm
It's hard to follow all this what with all the new monikers flying about. What exactly are AID-ers, AntiIDers?
0 Replies
 
spendius
 
  1  
Wed 20 Feb, 2008 07:00 pm
I only use AIDs-ers in retaliation for ID-jits and ID-iots. I am prepared to stick with anti-IDers if they will knock off the ID-jit and ID-iot stuff.

But that won't do really. Christians don't retaliate.

I think I am justified for scientific reasons.

An anti-IDer is a person who wishes to experiment with atheistic secular materialism as the way forward, from his comfy seat, without the bother of presenting any description, or even a hint, of what we get if we buy into it.

A snake-oil salesperson so to speak.
0 Replies
 
real life
 
  1  
Wed 20 Feb, 2008 10:32 pm
wandeljw wrote:
spendius wrote:
Sheesh! Bloody Florida. Shuttle late by 1.7 seconds. Disgraceful. Something should be done about science education down there.


My concern is that the science education vote took place in Florida. Who knows how long the recount will take. Smile


I put my money in a Florida bank. By the time they had finished counting it, I was a millionaire.
0 Replies
 
Joe Nation
 
  1  
Thu 21 Feb, 2008 05:40 am
Spendius wrote:
Quote:
Christianity is in the business of controlling biological impulses and without such control there is no hope for mankind.


No wonder Jesus wept. If there were people parading around and using my name and saying things such as the above, I'd bawl like baby, too.


Joe(What exactly did Christ say about being in the business...oh, never mind.)Nation
0 Replies
 
spendius
 
  1  
Thu 21 Feb, 2008 06:52 am
"Get thee behind me Satan."

"Knock off with the Momsie's apron strings."

"Forget revenge".

"My kingdom is not of this world."

I can't imagine you adopting any shred of any of those any time soon Joe but they are about controlling animal impulses one of which is the ignorant blurting of the pompous ego.
0 Replies
 
spendius
 
  1  
Thu 21 Feb, 2008 07:06 am
I can't imagine how anybody can criticise, say, Conrad Black and hold an anti-Jesus position. Mr Black's behaviour would have been applauded in Roman times and the honours of the state heaped upon his head so that he could play on a playing field suitable to his undoubted talents and thus bring more wealth into the Republic.

Had he finished up having his head chopped off it would be nothing to do with his methods and more to do with the animal impulses of bigger beasts in relation to activities within the cult of Isis.
0 Replies
 
spendius
 
  1  
Thu 21 Feb, 2008 07:23 am
How many of you anti-IDers have studied history for 15 years at great expense and were not aware that Mr Black's behaviour would have been applauded in Roman times and the honours of the state heaped upon his head so that he could play on a playing field suitable to his undoubted talents and thus bring more wealth into the Republic?

And that had he finished up having his head chopped off it would be nothing to do with his methods and more to do with the animal impulses of bigger beasts in relation to activities within the cult of Isis.

One might wonder what was the point of majoring in history if one hadn't learned simple things like that.

And that there was no prospect of anything changing if something dramatic didn't come to pass.

Fortunately for us one did. Maybe you have to feel fortunate to get the measure of it.
0 Replies
 
wandeljw
 
  1  
Thu 21 Feb, 2008 09:49 am
MICHAEL BEHE UPDATE

Quote:
Darwin party designed intelligently?
(By Michael Duck, The Morning Call, February 21, 2008)

When biochemistry professor Michael Behe's colleagues packed into an auditorium for a birthday party Wednesday at Lehigh University, Behe knew he wouldn't exactly be welcome.

The birthday boy was Charles Darwin, who would have turned 199 last week. And Behe is one of his best-known critics.

Behe catapulted to worldwide recognition in a landmark 2005 Pennsylvania court case when he testified in favor of ''intelligent design,'' arguing that some evolutionary leaps are too complex to have happened without some kind of designer, or God.

That puts him at odds with the rest of Lehigh's biochemistry department, which states on its Web site that Behe's views have ''no basis in science,'' while Darwin's theory of evolution is backed up by ''findings accumulated over 140 years.''

Organizers of Wednesday's event, which celebrated Darwin's contributions to everything from geology to theology, said the party in Bethlehem wasn't intended as a snub, and Behe said he wasn't offended.

''I think the party is being put on in order to show people that Darwin reigns supreme in biology,'' Behe said. ''And because I'm also in the department and I'm an intelligent-design proponent, they want to show that most people in the department are sane,'' he added sarcastically.

John Nyby, a biology professor and coordinator of the event in Whitaker Laboratory, countered, ''This is not an intelligent-design-bashing party. We have no interest in doing that. We're celebrating Darwin.Â…And we want people to know that Lehigh University supports Darwinian thought.''

Partygoers heard lectures, ate birthday cake and sang ''Happy Birthday'' to Darwin, who was born Feb. 12, 1809. He published his theories on evolution nearly 150 years ago, arguing that species evolved and differentiated by adapting to their environments over generations.

''Biology isn't really understood without invoking Darwin,'' said Nyby, who calls Darwin ''the greatest scientist of all time.''

Darwin started out as a geologist, and that background ''gave him a feeling for deep time,'' said Earth sciences professor Edward Evenson, one of the speakers Wednesday.

''People were beginning to wander away from the idea that the Earth was only a few thousand years old,'' the age indicated by a literal reading of the Bible, Evenson said.

He and Nyby said they're not religious.

Darwin's ideas also meant the book of Genesis couldn't be read anymore as natural history, said the Rev. Lloyd Steffen, the university chaplain and another speaker at the event.

''There are Christians today [still] enormously upset about that,'' said Steffen, a minister in the United Church of Christ. ''Me, I'm a bit of a poet, and I think there are other ways to know things,'' he added, saying the biblical account of creation can contain important truths even if it's not scientifically true.

Behe, a Roman Catholic, said his problems with Darwin's theory don't stem from religion. ''I was taught Darwin in parochial schools,'' he said. ''I never really had much of a problem with it.''

He accepts that Darwin's theories explain how a species can adapt over time, such as how bacteria become more resistant to antibiotics. ''But those are tiny, tiny changes,'' Behe said. For big leaps like the beginning of life itself, ''nobody has the foggiest idea how that occurred.''

Behe argues some parts of the cell are too complex to have evolved by chance over a long time, concluding that an intelligent designer must have guided the process. He believes that designer is God.

Steffen said he disagrees because intelligent design assumes that ''science can get you to infer logically that there's a creator.'' That's a fine philosophical argument, he said, but it incorrectly assumes science ''is the only way to know things.''

After hearing Behe testify in the 2005 case in York County, U.S. District Judge John E. Jones called intelligent design ''creationism repackaged,'' saying it could not be taught as science in the Dover Area School District.

Regardless of whether others accept his views, Behe said, he worries that events like Wednesday's party will convince students that Darwin's 150-year-old ideas will always be the last word.

''This party is like a group of scientists [around 1905] having a birthday party for Newton because they want people to think that they're not associated with this new guy Einstein,'' Behe said.

Although Nyby believes Darwin's ideas are biology's bedrock, he agreed scientists have lots more to learn. ''Science never reaches its end point,'' he said. ''There's an infinite amount of knowledge out there.''
0 Replies
 
gustavratzenhofer
 
  1  
Thu 21 Feb, 2008 09:52 am

The birthday boy was Charles Darwin, who would have turned 199 last week.


He's dead? When? How?
0 Replies
 
raprap
 
  1  
Thu 21 Feb, 2008 09:55 am
gustavratzenhofer wrote:

The birthday boy was Charles Darwin, who would have turned 199 last week.


He's dead? When? How?


He was eaten by a tyrannosaur in his sleep.

Rap
0 Replies
 
wandeljw
 
  1  
Thu 21 Feb, 2008 10:04 am
Some days there is so much news going on that even the death of a famous person goes unnoticed, Gus.

For example, the famous writer C. S. Lewis died November 22, 1963. (President Kennedy's assassination dominated news worldwide and even at Oxford University, where Lewis taught, most were unaware that Lewis had died.)
0 Replies
 
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Thu 21 Feb, 2008 11:50 am
wandel, I thought Kennedy was assassinated in 1964?
0 Replies
 
wandeljw
 
  1  
Thu 21 Feb, 2008 12:14 pm
c.i., it was 1963, late in 1963 (maybe that's why you are thinking '64)
0 Replies
 
spendius
 
  1  
Thu 21 Feb, 2008 12:16 pm
Trust a pedantic AIDs-er twit to point that out when it is irrelevant to the point Gus made.

wande quoted-

Quote:
Behe catapulted to worldwide recognition


I bet that aggravated his colleagues no end eh?

According to Germaine Greer Darwin was a serial rapist. And seven years on The Beagle at that age has serial wanking on the end of it.

I see my latest question has gone unanswered.

"Can't we talk about Olivia's new hairstyle?"
0 Replies
 
wandeljw
 
  1  
Thu 21 Feb, 2008 12:27 pm
wandeljw wrote:
Some days there is so much news going on that even the death of a famous person goes unnoticed, Gus.

For example, the famous writer C. S. Lewis died November 22, 1963. (President Kennedy's assassination dominated news worldwide and even at Oxford University, where Lewis taught, most were unaware that Lewis had died.)


Moreover, Charles Darwin died in 1882 the same year that England lost to Australia in cricket for the very first time. The sports tragedy cast such a cloud that all other events in 1882 were considered insignificant.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

 
Copyright © 2025 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.11 seconds on 08/02/2025 at 05:53:54