97
   

Intelligent Design Theory: Science or Religion?

 
 
farmerman
 
  1  
Sun 13 May, 2007 08:42 pm
spendi has ADD anyway. Hell never remember what he said when the spirits leave his bladder.
0 Replies
 
farmerman
 
  1  
Sun 13 May, 2007 08:43 pm
WHENEVER SPENDI WAKES UP, IM ASSUMING HELL HAVE A HEADACHE SO LETS YELL REAL LOUD
0 Replies
 
Mathos
 
  1  
Mon 14 May, 2007 02:39 am
SPENDIPUS wrote:
Mathos, my leetle lurve,

The Zulu post was not about Zulus. I could have chosen any number of religious dogmas to make the point.

You are supposed to be informing us what "Total anti-ID" looks like. Your post could just as easily have been written by any anti-Catholic religious fanatic. An IDer of another stamp. Luther, Calvin and Zwigli did that stuff centuries before Rorkes (sic) Drift. If you think Rorkes(sic) Drift is old-fashioned you should read up on that lot. They make your stuff look like an editorial in Woman's Home Furnishings, which is a defunct magazine specialising in selling nails with which to nail blokes up on the cross of female hegemony and tart's knickers curtains at all the windows.

A militant Islamic mullah or an Old Testament nutter might well agree with everything you vomit.

Did you not know that auricular confession is the starting point of the Western style of auto-biography and all of our Western art which so distinguishes us from all the rest of recorded humanity.

Tell us what an anti-ID world would look like.

We will decide whether to buy into it or not when you have outlined its major characteristics.



I'm so glad you brought my attention to the spelling error Puss, how I wish I had been educated!

You have this irksome, if not dastardly habit of switching your comments around the circles of your own mind, somewhat akin to a contrary bastard with no design or knowledge of relativity.

There must be an underlying cause for your Janus type meanderings, you convince yourself, that Spendipus is right in all he sayeth, but when it's proved to you that what you said is nothing more than childish poppycock, you deny meaning it as you previously did. In my book, a goal is a goal, not an excuse for a free kick.

Anybody scanning, let alone reading this thread will be fully aware of how shallow your argument is, that you clutch at straws in order to fulfill a vacant slot in your cranium, asserting it to be correct of course. Rather like Mumbo-Jumbo ruling the world in Spendi's after-thoughts.

I challenge you Spendi, come with me, to the Thai-Burmese border and live in the hills with the Karen National Defence Organisation (KNDO).
I'll stand the cost of your flight, accommodation is free, but you will have to walk several miles a day through real jungle.

It's the monsoon season now and you could neither hack it or survive it this time of year. We can make all sensible arrangements and leave perhaps the 20th of November next, I should have you safely home for Christmas.

I can't guarantee your safety 100%, I have to admit that, but I will act as your PPO (Personal Protection Operative) and arrange additional cover for you. We could be beneficial to those poor souls out there and take them some medical supplies whilst we are going their way.

That way, you will be fully able to appreciate what real life and going back to basics is, you can even watch young men dipping their spears for real, and some more.

Yes or No?
0 Replies
 
spendius
 
  1  
Mon 14 May, 2007 02:46 am
Chum quoted-

Quote:
That is the answer to survival Spendi, culling, selective and well managed progeny. Real anti ID.


I agree. That's a bit closer to real anti-ID rather than the lower-middle class twaddle we are used to. No David Beckham, no Wayne Rooney, no Mike Tyson, no Bill Clinton etc. Just descendents of Mathos and Chum and those they approve of.

Euthenasia and eugenics. The Dr Strangelove position. Part of it at least.

One presumes Judge Overton might say that no law was required to bring it in and that he would give Mathos and Chum certificates of permission to breed and immunity from culling.

fm must get headaches when he goes to the pub and thus, naturally, projects that everyone else does.

I remember all this thread. I don't go from post to post doing glib soundbite blurts.

I assume the other anti-IDers on here are up for culling and having exclusive rights to the selected ladies.

You should tell one of the presidential hopefuls. He or she will sweep the board with such an original and popular idea as that. He could quote Plato for moral support.

Maybe elections wouldn't be needed though.

Lovely! Scientific methodology scientifically applied.

Welcome Oh Brave New World.
0 Replies
 
Joe Nation
 
  1  
Mon 14 May, 2007 03:00 am
Won't god strike all the bad people dead first? Like he did with the earthquakes and such.


Joe(im so cullable)Nation
0 Replies
 
spendius
 
  1  
Mon 14 May, 2007 03:20 am
Come on anti-IDers. Shape up.

You have been shown a glimpse of Total anti-ID. I laid out most of it two years ago for your perusal.

Mathos is your new leader with Chum at his shoulder. The rest of you are the poor bloody infantry who are sweeping the path for them and strewing the rose petals. Once that's done you will be for culling or, if you are very, very good, just being sterilised.

Mathos my leetle cheekin'-

Try not to make so many assertions all at once. It's so naff.

You should invite your fellow anti-IDers on your training course in the jungle. They need toughening up.

I'm a big softie as you say and like my home comforts.

Isn't it nice of me to provide you with excuses to tell us all how tough you are. I trust you are not making any of it up. How long can you hold your hand in a candle flame?
0 Replies
 
Mathos
 
  1  
Mon 14 May, 2007 03:39 am
Spendipus


All you have to do is come with me Pussycat, I'm not asking you to carry an M16 or anything!


You can vaunt away on your return and explain real life to your pub cronies!


My, you would have the lady bus driver in the mini skirt and low cut blouse hanging onto your every word and looking you in the eyes.


PS I never hold my hand in candle flames, it's a silly trait, the girls do it in cookery lessons I understand.
0 Replies
 
spendius
 
  1  
Mon 14 May, 2007 05:16 am
Listen Mr Wobbly Jellyfish-

I wouldn't go to the south entrance to meet a feminised flouncer like you let alone to some bloody jungle setting in some far-flung region of the earth that we haven't got to work on yet. Don't you know that the psychologists are very suspicious of the body building types. They reckon they overcompensate or something.

My little bus driver likes romancing under soft lighting with a cocktail in her delicate hand with which she could have you going off in a 10 second burst of glory. We celibates challenge their reserves of stamina and skill.

Despite your obvious knowledge of cookery lessons I rather doubt your assertion regarding the candle flame. What I had in mind was a candle-flame wrestle between you and a real tough guy. I've seen one such match in my days of youthful madness. For money.

What's your position on intensive care and racial impurity. All the full-baked anti-IDers I have met (not a few) had strong views on those. Would people with known hereditable "defects" be allowed to breed under the rule of Total anti-ID?

It is noticeable that the ladies on the Trivia threads are impressed with your views so you are building a following and you can count on the other anti-IDers on here for support I'm sure.

Is that right boys?
0 Replies
 
Mathos
 
  1  
Mon 14 May, 2007 07:07 am
It's absolutely side splitting how you change and get your Dutch courage once the doors of perfection open Spendipus!

How many pints did it take to muster that little bit of fourteen year old type playground baiting? Or do you sit in the vault with a lap top on your knee, letting the other scroungers have their say ... Yeah yeah Spendipus, that'll show him!

I have to be honest with you, I never came across a female bus driver who didn't look like Desperate Dan! and they all drink cider.

How's your eye sight?

I'm all for intensive care mate, I actually needed it once!

As for racial impurity, is there such a thing? Your an obvious cross between a Labrador and a **** house door but you still get labelled as an oink. That might not be fair on the oinks! In fact the whole of the occidental world is made up like Heinz, fifty seven varieties and still counting.

So we have had a little trip around your back yard, but as usual with you Pussy-Cat, we see you still floundering in your own little pool of piss and ****!

Can't you find a way out?

PS if you know a tough guy or was that a real tough guy? Who wants to arm wrestle me for a wager bring him on board, if he beats me I'll pay him a bounty, if I win, you come with me to The Orient. Now thats the kind of wager a real man couldn't refuse.
0 Replies
 
OGIONIK
 
  1  
Mon 14 May, 2007 07:16 am
I think i speak for alot of people when i say this thread took a turn for the worse. Even i dont flame this much!

back to the facts people!
0 Replies
 
Mathos
 
  1  
Mon 14 May, 2007 07:21 am
Duplication
0 Replies
 
spendius
 
  1  
Mon 14 May, 2007 08:24 am
OGI wrote-

Quote:
back to the facts people!


This is the first time there's been any facts regarding proper anti-ID. I hope you didn't think the coffee-morning discussions before were actually anti-ID. It's nearly two years since I told them that they would run, screaming and kicking, from the merest sight of proper materialstic scientific methodology. That was a fact then and it's a fact now. It's facts we've been short of all along. We've only had self-indulgent posturing so far, apart from me of course.

Religion ain't no play thing for semi-educated Yanks to bray over.

What sort of a scientific methodologist would put Mathos through intensive care so he could fly around the world doing his bit to melt the ice-caps. He would have been culled there and then assuming he wasn't a member of the irreplaceable scientific elite which I don't think he is.

Feel free to flame OGI so long as it's to do with FACTS. I don't mind. Don't repress your innermost anti-IDism.

Mathos- I won't be in the pub for another 7 hours yet. And I never drink anywhere else. It helps me in my sociological field work. Survery are no good. Everybody tells lies in them. "Watch the parking meters".

Arm wrestling is for nancies in crisis.
0 Replies
 
OGIONIK
 
  1  
Mon 14 May, 2007 08:33 am
Its been said before im sure, what if god is the one who started evolution?

does that nullify both sides?

what if god wasnt a sentient being? what is he was simply the laws of the universe, for what could be less biased than non-sentient rules? thus explaing why bad things happen to good people and vice versa.

If we use a certain logic to define our creation, can that same logic be used to imply god himself must have a creator?

what if what if what if! conjecture galore!

Can someone lay out the concrete facts for both sides of this argument for me? im lost in a sea of what ifs and possibilities.I havent studied religion to much and would simply like some facts, for both sides.
0 Replies
 
wandeljw
 
  1  
Mon 14 May, 2007 08:50 am
Quote:
Parents and District Settle Dispute on Teacher's Religious Remarks
0 Replies
 
Mathos
 
  1  
Mon 14 May, 2007 08:52 am
They must have realised the potential in the slab of chewed up meat then Puss! They didn't wheel me in and out like a tosser on a conveyor belt.

I wouldn't waste a needle full of cocaine on you to take a tooth out, or a dentist.

I see your egg head mates are complaining all ready, are we upsetting them Puss?

I could go on, but I'm going to pick a couple of lads up from school and take them to the boxing gym, I'm helping out there due to illness on one of the coaches behalf. Assistant coach with a stopwatch. Then there are all the forms to fill in, the health and safety management side of it, they even want to let girls train nowadays. Not with me in a corner they won't.

It's little wonder the main man is ill, is it?
0 Replies
 
Mathos
 
  1  
Mon 14 May, 2007 08:54 am
OGIONIK wrote:
Its been said before im sure, what if god is the one who started evolution?

does that nullify both sides?

what if god wasnt a sentient being? what is he was simply the laws of the universe, for what could be less biased than non-sentient rules? thus explaing why bad things happen to good people and vice versa.

If we use a certain logic to define our creation, can that same logic be used to imply god himself must have a creator?

what if what if what if! conjecture galore!

Can someone lay out the concrete facts for both sides of this argument for me? im lost in a sea of what ifs and possibilities.I havent studied religion to much and would simply like some facts, for both sides.



If I were you mate, I'd go to Sunday school and then come back. Or PM Spendi, he might fill you in.!
0 Replies
 
Setanta
 
  1  
Mon 14 May, 2007 08:59 am
That was an interesting bit of news, Wandel. I note that the bible-thumper is still in a position of authority in the school, and i don't see that any provision has been made to assure that he doesn't peddle his bilge again to those who are a captive audience in his classroom.
0 Replies
 
spendius
 
  1  
Mon 14 May, 2007 09:17 am
What's interesting about an incident?

There could be all sorts of personal factors in play.

Not that I approve of Mr Paszkiewicz's remarks assuming they are as given. If he said that as it stands in the report he shouldn't be within the school precincts. Pay peanuts and you get monkeys.

Is there a dress and language code at the school? Both those are a form of proselytizing. Christian bourgeoise values.

An educational system on the cheap is bound to contain many types of incident. Blowing one up out of proportion and drawing universal conclusions from it not only insults the intelligence of threaders but can be classed as devious and opportunistic.
0 Replies
 
wandeljw
 
  1  
Mon 14 May, 2007 09:19 am
Setanta,

If the case had gone to trial, the "captive audience" aspect would have become important. Judges are more inclined to rule that an establishment clause violation has occurred when the case involves elementary or secondary school students. School attendance is mandatory for students at that age. Therefore, they are indeed a "captive audience".
0 Replies
 
Setanta
 
  1  
Mon 14 May, 2007 09:24 am
I agree, and that is why i do not agree with the statement made by Mr. Lindenfelser that his settlement has provided a "primary remedy." It appears to me that the settlement dodges the important issue raised in this case.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

 
Copyright © 2025 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.11 seconds on 01/21/2025 at 10:51:42