Foxfyre wrote:Joe Nation wrote:Spendius: I don't know what the situation is where you are, but here in the United States there is a concentrated effort to reform our basic education standards in Science to reflect Christian Theology.
It is a serious threat to the future of this nation.
Joe(How many dinosaurs were on Noah's Ark?)Nation
It depends on what you mean by 'reflected'.
The weird thing about this whole debate is the inability of the anti-IDers to see that most ID-ers are right there agreeing that Christian theology or any other religious theology should not be included in basic public education standards in any format other than a comparative religions class or similar curriculum. At the same time, for educators to acknowledge how religion has been a significant component of our history, laws, mores, value system, and structures is not only honest but essential for a well rounded education.
Again, when ID comes up, all a science teacher or professor has to do is explain that various forms of ID are believed by most Americans; however, these can be neither tested nor falsified by any known scientific principles or processes and therefore will not be included in the science curriculum in the class. In so doing, the teacher retains the integrity of the science class without presuming to dismiss the faith and value system of his/her students.
That is all I ask. That is all most IDers ask. As for those few nuts pushing for ID to be included side by side with science in public school curriculum, I think we all need to resist that as detrimental to public school education.
Foxfyre:
What you have written above is a well thought out, reasoned response and I thank you for it. It is, however, a far more rosy view of the current, I hesitate to use the word battle because some of the heat has been taken out of the ID camp's activities so I will say, argument.
Any science teacher who would dare to say that Intelligent Design is untestable, even though it IS untestable, in front of say someone like a Monica Goodling, would spend the rest of the semester defending that statement of fact in the classroom and probably in some court. Remember there is a supposed war on religion going on in the United States, ask Bill O'Reilly, and the soldiers of Christ have decided not to play nice anymore.
It is an educational disaster that is looming, at just the moment that this nation needs millions (not an overstatement) of new engineers, technicians and scientists to provide us with the knowledge and ideas for the future, these IDers and their ilk are doing everything in their power to undercut the work Science does.
And it's a very easy thing for them to do. It's about answers. Because people of faith have all the answers, (the answer to every question is the power of God.) any question not answerable by Science is believed to be a confirmation of their belief. Of course, it's not, Science would say that research will find the answers, it just hasn't found them yet. That's not good enough for people of faith.
People of faith are never wrong, the answer is always God, science is often wrong and wrong-headed and stupefying off course, but that is part of the work to find the facts. People of faith, having never been wrong, see trial and error as a flawed process.
Now, if you are a kid in school and you are presented with the idea that there is an easy answer to everything or you might have to really do some work to discover the actual facts, which do you think the kid will choose??
In the past five years, while we are engaged in this debate over whether there is such a thing as an irreducible complexity pointing to the existence of a supernatural power the nations of China and India together have produced a million degreed engineers and scientists.
Per year.
That's according to the author of The World is Flat.
Joe(but that probably not of any consequence, right?)Nation