97
   

Intelligent Design Theory: Science or Religion?

 
 
farmerman
 
  1  
Fri 13 Apr, 2007 03:50 pm
What do you cal the student who graduated last in his or her medical class?

Foxy, you want in the worst way to make some kind of point, Valid or not, and Spendi is like your own personal Renfield going henh henh henhhhh..

Quote:
But those who claim to have experienced God and via that experience know ID to be fact number into the millions. Can you say something is extraordinary when many millions of people, that cloud of witnesses, testify to the experience? Not belief based on teaching, mind you, but experience.
I can see a cathedral or a large tent filled with people all claiming the same revelation. DO I believe it? Hell no, and, AND, its something we dont even bother with. You wish to claim that mass delusion is proof of something, the BURDEN IS ON YOU, NOT ME.
Also, I guess I dont understand anything about your point about the stove.
Quote:
Science is not able to test my reported experience re temperature however. If I and all those others report to the scientist that the stove was hot or cold or something in between when we touched it, all the known scientific principles and processes in the world will not assist the scientist to prove or disprove what we tell him.


why not? what are you missing?
0 Replies
 
rosborne979
 
  1  
Fri 13 Apr, 2007 04:07 pm
Foxfyre wrote:
But those who claim to have experienced God and via that experience know ID to be fact number into the millions. Can you say something is extraordinary when many millions of people, that cloud of witnesses, testify to the experience?


It depends on the basic assumptions you use to view the world.

If you already believe in the supernatural, then no claim is ever really extraordinary. Ghosts and Demons, Gnomes and Fairies, Gods and Devils, an endless pantheon of possibilities are all equally valid. Many people belive in Ghosts and Demons, Zombies, Vampires, Witches, Shades and Spirits, does the fact that millions believe in that make them true. Of course not.

But if you approach the world scientifically, then it doesn't matter how many people believe it, it's still an extraordinary claim.
0 Replies
 
Setanta
 
  1  
Fri 13 Apr, 2007 04:13 pm
farmerman wrote:
. . . and Spendi is like your own personal Renfield going henh henh henhhhh..


That was a classic image, Boss, i cracked up on that one. I could also summon an image of Spendi snatching the flies out of the air and eating them . . .
0 Replies
 
Ethel2
 
  1  
Fri 13 Apr, 2007 04:25 pm
rosborne979 wrote:
Foxfyre wrote:
But those who claim to have experienced God and via that experience know ID to be fact number into the millions. Can you say something is extraordinary when many millions of people, that cloud of witnesses, testify to the experience?


It depends on the basic assumptions you use to view the world.

If you already believe in the supernatural, then no claim is ever really extraordinary. Ghosts and Demons, Gnomes and Fairies, Gods and Devils, an endless pantheon of possibilities are all equally valid. Many people belive in Ghosts and Demons, Zombies, Vampires, Witches, Shades and Spirits, does the fact that millions believe in that make them true. Of course not.

But if you approach the world scientifically, then it doesn't matter how many people believe it, it's still an extraordinary claim.


There are institutions around the world in which certain people reside who experience being God, or they experience having a donut for a nose, or they hear a voice telling them to kill someone or they think they're so constipated that dookie is clogging their thoarts.........since so many experience it, then of course it's true. And the number of people with those experiences need't be so high either. Anything's possible if you disregard science.

Heck, I'm sure that if I step on a crack I'll break my mother's back. There you go. Why not just call ourselves God and we can make anything true?
0 Replies
 
rosborne979
 
  1  
Fri 13 Apr, 2007 04:34 pm
Setanta wrote:
I could also summon an image of Spendi snatching the flies out of the air and eating them . . .


More likely boring them to death with inane drivel until they fall into his beer, and then drinking them.

Pardon my assertion.
0 Replies
 
Setanta
 
  1  
Fri 13 Apr, 2007 04:36 pm
Why?

Assertions are meat and drink for Spurious--in fact, i'd say he'd have almost nothing to post without assertions.
0 Replies
 
Foxfyre
 
  1  
Fri 13 Apr, 2007 04:58 pm
farmerman wrote:
What do you cal the student who graduated last in his or her medical class?

Foxy, you want in the worst way to make some kind of point, Valid or not, and Spendi is like your own personal Renfield going henh henh henhhhh..

Quote:
But those who claim to have experienced God and via that experience know ID to be fact number into the millions. Can you say something is extraordinary when many millions of people, that cloud of witnesses, testify to the experience? Not belief based on teaching, mind you, but experience.
I can see a cathedral or a large tent filled with people all claiming the same revelation. DO I believe it? Hell no, and, AND, its something we dont even bother with. You wish to claim that mass delusion is proof of something, the BURDEN IS ON YOU, NOT ME.
Also, I guess I dont understand anything about your point about the stove.
Quote:
Science is not able to test my reported experience re temperature however. If I and all those others report to the scientist that the stove was hot or cold or something in between when we touched it, all the known scientific principles and processes in the world will not assist the scientist to prove or disprove what we tell him.


why not? what are you missing?
0 Replies
 
spendius
 
  1  
Fri 13 Apr, 2007 05:10 pm
Setanta wrote-

Quote:
I could also summon an image of Spendi snatching the flies out of the air and eating them . . .


Is that all? I could summon an image which my upbringing and education has taught me it would be ungentlemanly to , not to say crass and babylike.
0 Replies
 
Foxfyre
 
  1  
Fri 13 Apr, 2007 05:12 pm
rosborne979 wrote:
Foxfyre wrote:
But those who claim to have experienced God and via that experience know ID to be fact number into the millions. Can you say something is extraordinary when many millions of people, that cloud of witnesses, testify to the experience?


It depends on the basic assumptions you use to view the world.

If you already believe in the supernatural, then no claim is ever really extraordinary. Ghosts and Demons, Gnomes and Fairies, Gods and Devils, an endless pantheon of possibilities are all equally valid. Many people belive in Ghosts and Demons, Zombies, Vampires, Witches, Shades and Spirits, does the fact that millions believe in that make them true. Of course not.

But if you approach the world scientifically, then it doesn't matter how many people believe it, it's still an extraordinary claim.


I don't know whether there are ghosts or demons. I've never seen either and there is not (yet) a sufficient cloud of credible witnesses who claim to have seen or experienced such to convince me of their existence.

As I don't know anybody who has ever seen a zombie or vampire or witch or shade or spirit or gnome or fairy (assuming a spirit is different from a ghost), I would find such a claim interesting but not believable. I might even think millions of people claiming a religious experience to be extraordinary if I had not shared their experience.

But just like the people who touched the stove and found it hot are more likely to believe me when I report that the stove was hot, when I experience what millions claim to have experienced, it is not difficult to accept something as fact.

As I told FM, I don't ask or require you to believe me. But neither can you disprove or falsify my belief with any known scientific principle or by your own disbelief.

And it is for this reason, that no science teacher worth his salt would tell a child that there is no Intelligent Design for the universe.
0 Replies
 
spendius
 
  1  
Fri 13 Apr, 2007 05:16 pm
Steanta wrote-

Quote:
Assertions are meat and drink for Spurious--in fact, i'd say he'd have almost nothing to post without assertions.


Give me an example. Don't just assert it. If I'm guilty of such inanity as trading in assertions I want to know. But asserting someone is asserting is the pits of the earth. You just know you are dealing with an extermely thick person when that sort of shite starts splattering on your doorstep.

I've asked three, maybe more, questions today and the anti-IDers have simply asserted their way out of them.

They have a wall around their position and inside it they are sucking on each other's lollipops. Cosy eh?

Lola - knock off the sophistry eh? It doesn't become a Queen of the Manhattan twilight.
0 Replies
 
spendius
 
  1  
Fri 13 Apr, 2007 05:24 pm
Foxy wrote-

Quote:
My whole point, however, is that your not believing me does not falsify my claim as to what I have experienced.


Anti-IDers are unable to conceptualise anything they have not themselves experienced. They are the worst sort of Victorian puritans.
0 Replies
 
spendius
 
  1  
Fri 13 Apr, 2007 05:29 pm
Foxy wrote-

Quote:
And it is for this reason, that no science teacher worth his salt would tell a child that there is no Intelligent Design for the universe.


If s/he did such an unscientific thing as that s/he should be run out of town as fast as the conveyance will go.
0 Replies
 
spendius
 
  1  
Fri 13 Apr, 2007 05:42 pm
ros wrote-

Quote:
If you already believe in the supernatural, then no claim is ever really extraordinary. Ghosts and Demons, Gnomes and Fairies, Gods and Devils, an endless pantheon of possibilities are all equally valid. Many people belive in Ghosts and Demons, Zombies, Vampires, Witches, Shades and Spirits, does the fact that millions believe in that make them true. Of course not.


How do you define all these words you are using ros?

I believe in witches because I know what the word means in the official canon and it is very difficult not to believe in them when you know that. The other words are simply vague alternatives. Spin. Smears. Shite.

Not only do you rely on your own ignorance but you rely on that of your audience.

I'm here to tell you that they are not all as ignorant as you seem to find convenient.

I suggest you try to derive your philosophical views from somewhere other than your newspaper and the easy viewing programmes you obviously favour so that you might be flattered enough about how intelligent you are to get you to gawp at the ads endlessly.
0 Replies
 
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Fri 13 Apr, 2007 05:58 pm
Trying to prove anybody's "experience" by scientific proof is idiotic.
0 Replies
 
spendius
 
  1  
Fri 13 Apr, 2007 06:30 pm
Thank you. Have you been at the Tenerife tush butties c.i.?
0 Replies
 
wandeljw
 
  1  
Fri 13 Apr, 2007 07:25 pm
Wow! Page 1000!
0 Replies
 
gustavratzenhofer
 
  1  
Fri 13 Apr, 2007 07:27 pm
You should be proud, wandel. You created this baby.
0 Replies
 
farmerman
 
  1  
Fri 13 Apr, 2007 08:21 pm
We should name it "Iddy"
0 Replies
 
Foxfyre
 
  1  
Fri 13 Apr, 2007 09:06 pm
Or Darwiddy. Smile
0 Replies
 
rosborne979
 
  1  
Fri 13 Apr, 2007 10:49 pm
Foxfyre wrote:
And it is for this reason, that no science teacher worth his salt would tell a child that there is no Intelligent Design for the universe.


"And it is for this reason, that no science teacher worth his salt would tell a child that there are no Gnomes or Fairies in the universe."

Do you hear how dumb that sounds?

And yet ID is exactly as plausible as Gnomes and Fairies.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

 
Copyright © 2025 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.11 seconds on 01/12/2025 at 04:00:56