Sheesh! This is getting embarrassing.
Are there no Americans reading here who wish to disassociate thenselves from the infantile claptrap being presented on this thread by anti-ID Americans who, by their own admission, are a fifth, at best, of the American population. The impression is being given that these contributions by a mere three or four of this small minority represent the position and method of interaction of the American intelligence.
They are even quoting themselves. "(as ros best described)".
I'm sure that the crime rate in North Korea and Iran is much lower than that in the US but I'm not sure what conclusions to draw from that. One presumes it is only reported crime anyway. And crime itself is a debateable category.
One has to wonder whether the high US crime rate is associated with the method of proceeding in social interactions displayed in the posts above coming from that country.
In just three lines fm managed four heavy-handed assertions all of which are untrue in every respect as anyone who reads these threads properly will know.
I must admit to not understanding science and government as much as I would like (there isn't the time) but I have far more understanding of it than the two posters concerned do. They display a knowledge of both subjects asymptoting with zero. It might even be necessary for them to start their education on empty again for them to begin to gain even a modicum of understanding of either such are their prejudices and the reflexivity of their assertiveness.
I would bet good money that neither could read a chapter of Spengler and get 1 out of 100 in an examination on it. They had never even heard of Vico and La Mettrie. It goes without saying that their understanding of the humanist de Sade is nothing. They can't even read Joyce. They don't know Veblen's works. They know nothing of the Materialist Theory of Mind.
They think Dylan is a folk singer. They are intolerant, bombastic and bigoted.
And the evidence is up in lights on our back pages. Flashing impertinently in every direction. They have not one answer to any of the serious questions they have been asked. They are in opposition to 80%, at least, of the American population and to the President and any of his likely successors. Also to the British government and, judging by wande's earlier quote, the German government. They are only in step in a room by themselves and if they were in that situation they would soon be falling out and reaching.
All they can do is blurt. Loud and long and to no effect. They haven't even got on board yet that their assertions are water off a duck's back.
Try answering this one-
Quote:Can you not see that by using assertions you empower others to do the same unless you assert that only your assertions have validity.
which is simple enough.