wande quoted-
Quote:"I think it makes sense to bring up multidisciplinary and interdisciplinary problems for discussion," she said, adding that this would solve the problem of students being confronted with completely different points of view in religion and biology classes.
That's a point I made numerous times during the Dover business. It is a problem and the lady who agrees with me has been elected (I presume) and Herr Kutschera has not. In fact the idea that contradictory points of view on an important subject being taught in the one school is patently ridiculous.
It seems to me that the anti-IDers have polarised the positions. They were the boat rockers in Dover going against elected people.
Herr Kutschera also seems to exhibit the anti-IDer's penchant for assertions which are easy to make when you are not running things.
Quote:Evolution is "a fact that has been explained with a modern theory," he said. "Otherwise all the thousands of scientists who, like us, pursue evolution research -- including those at Stanford and Harvard -- would be lunatics."
Such as that. Why can't the "thousands of scientists" get on with their work whatever their views are on anything and leave the millions of citizens to go along with the people they elected and empowered to direct their affairs. His statement is simply false.
Anti-ID is profoundly anti-democractic as one might expect because evolution is also. They seek the hegemony of "brains". They express themselves as if it is their birthright and self-evident. Their whole demenour is shaped by that.
And the science of the wisdom of large groups contradicts them and they also have a circular argument to justify their idea of "brains" which they themselves police.
But the fear of their anti-democratic tendencies and the thought of tying in their demenour to power is constantly going to frustrate them.
History shows that the wisdom of large groups has kept them at arm's length and if I might, for once, be allowed an opinion I would think rightly so.