Quote:What a mess. Couldn't any symbol be challenged on its spiritual meaning. Isn't "Los Angeles" a symbol recognising the existence of saints?
I should have said "angels" not "saints. Beg pardon.
I am interested in your ideas on this. And on the $ sign.
Could they not argue that the cross symbol is only an abstract symbol in the same way that Los Angeles is, and the $ sign, and thus say that there is no need to change it in the same way that there is no need to change those.
Isn't the tiny cross from the official county seal (symbolizing the founding of the County by missionaries),likely to be connected to the naming of the place by the founding missionaries.
Thus, maybe,saving the million bucks. (Why 'bucks'?). Unless saving a million bucks is not what they have in mind. Of course.