97
   

Intelligent Design Theory: Science or Religion?

 
 
Chumly
 
  1  
Sun 2 Jul, 2006 04:04 pm
0 Replies
 
rosborne979
 
  1  
Sun 2 Jul, 2006 04:13 pm
timberlandko wrote:
rosborne979 wrote:
It seems that the issue is starting to leak into mainstream comedy.

At once amusing, gratifying, and wonderfully promising is that those most outraged at finding themselves rendered public laughingstock precisely are and most energetically persist in being the causation of their own discomfiture.


I saw a Doonesbury comic this afternoon in which a Dr. diagnoses his patient with TB. The patient says, "can you cure it?" and Dr. says, "that depends, are you a creationist?". The patient says, "yes, but why does it matter?". The Dr. says, "because I need to know if you want me to treat the original form of TB, or the form that it has evolved into after years of resisting the antibiotics". The patient says, "what so different about the new antibiotics?", and the Dr. says, "they were intelligently designed".
0 Replies
 
spendius
 
  1  
Sun 2 Jul, 2006 04:59 pm
That joke reminds me of the one about the knickerless can-can.
0 Replies
 
spendius
 
  1  
Sun 2 Jul, 2006 05:00 pm
A derivative of which is stunningly and expensively related in Apocalypse Now.
0 Replies
 
spendius
 
  1  
Sun 2 Jul, 2006 05:03 pm
Which explains why it was way over budget and caused high executives to sweat.
0 Replies
 
farmerman
 
  1  
Mon 3 Jul, 2006 05:30 am
you cant hit a home run each time at bat spendi.
0 Replies
 
spendius
 
  1  
Mon 3 Jul, 2006 07:19 am
I know anti-IDers are a bit defeatist but I didn't know they were that far gone.

That's pure anti-Faustian fm.
0 Replies
 
spendius
 
  1  
Mon 3 Jul, 2006 08:09 am
Lola wrote-

Quote:
Bernie is designing jewelry, and very successfully now too. But don't tell him I told you because every time he admits it, he worries about his sperm count going down. Silly man........I mean owner. laugh


It isn't the SC he ought to worry about it's his political credibility. Ladies' ornamentation is flat-out, bang at it, atavistic, sympathetic magic of the most superstitious and shamanistic belief systems on a par with neck rings,plate lips , clitordectomy, foot binding, incantationary mumbo-jumbo and elaborate vestments all conducted in tasteful surroundings redolent with pastel shades, discreet lighting, incense and reverent voice tones.

In England these days it is known as "bling" as in "bling and buy sale".

For a socialist it is preposterous. Well off Republican ladies make up the majority of the punters who buy it and who thus have to be flattered at the sales point.

Marx said something about how the way one gets one's living conditions the way one thinks.

"Gimme the moonlight
Gimme the girls
And leave the rest
To meeeeeeeeeee".

Frankie Vaughan.
0 Replies
 
wandeljw
 
  1  
Mon 3 Jul, 2006 08:17 am
Quote:
Bill may deter religious lawsuits
(By SETH GOLDSTEIN, York Daily Record, July 3, 2006)

Those who challenged the mentioning of intelligent design last year in a Dover Area School District biology class might have been deterred from going to court if a bill under debate in a House subcommittee had been passed then.

The bill, introduced recently by Rep. John Hostettler, R-Ind., would prohibit people who bring religious symbol lawsuits against local or state governments from collecting monetary damages or attorney fees if they win.

Opponents of the measure, which will be reviewed and possibly voted on by the House Judiciary Committee after the July 4 recess, say it aims to discourage people from filing these lawsuits.

"The bill creates an opportunity for school districts to promote religious views knowing those hurt by it won't bring in any legal assistance," said Eric Rothschild, one of the lead attorneys for the 11 plaintiffs in the Dover intelligent design case.

Witold Walczak, an American Civil Liberties Union attorney who also represented the plaintiffs, said the bill would attack individuals "in their pockets" to scare them from filing the lawsuits because they would have to pay for the attorneys themselves. He said many attorneys take the lawsuits without payment, as he and Rothschild did in the Dover case, but the expenses for their research and investigation need to be covered.

"None of the 11 plaintiffs, if they pooled their resources together, could afford the type of legal assistance they needed," Walczak said.

In the Dover case, the school district now has to pay a $1 million bill to the plaintiffs' attorneys.

Rep. Todd Platts, R-York County, whose district includes Dover, said he supports the bill because it would allow the legal system to decide issues and remove any kind of intimidation tactics.

"Different organizations, including the ACLU, tend to use the threat of fees as a means to intimidate local governments who don't have deep pockets to take an action they wouldn't otherwise do," Platts said.

Other supporters who testified at a hearing on the bill last week echoed Platts' belief that there's a need to level the playing field for local governments facing large advocacy groups in court.

"Many (local governments) don't have the means or time to set aside a small fortune to defend their constitutional rights against these liberal organizations," Hostettler said during the hearing.
0 Replies
 
spendius
 
  1  
Mon 3 Jul, 2006 09:14 am
wande-

That suggests that Dover was a pyrrhic victory or,to put it another way, that anti-IDers prematurely ejaculated their boasting noises.

Quote:
He said many attorneys take the lawsuits without payment, as he and Rothschild did in the Dover case, but the expenses for their research and investigation need to be covered.


The Pope lives on "expenses". And even that doesn't cover the use of "many". Is Mr Walczak one of those who likes to sound virtuous whilst earning 50 times what a nurse earns.

Quote:
"None of the 11 plaintiffs, if they pooled their resources together, could afford the type of legal assistance they needed," Walczak said.


I would have rephrased that one.

It all makes the Dover judgement sound a bit fishy don't you think? It seems as if the lawyers don't get paid if JJ finds for the board.And I suppose JJ socialises with lawyers in the main.

"Have gavel-will travel" is a nice motto.

Don't forget wande that scientists are skeptical to the very marrow of their bones.Real ones I mean.

The legal profession in England is not famous for its toothless gums. The most well known firm of fictitious lawyers is Sue, Grabbit and Run in Private Eye.
0 Replies
 
farmerman
 
  1  
Mon 3 Jul, 2006 09:28 am
wandel. IMHO (and based upon no legal footing upon which to stand) SUCH A LAW WOULD BE TESTED IN THE USSC since
1. theyve already taken a position on money=free speech Also,
2.The case would almost be self cancelling, In order to violate the terms of this law, youd have to first show that your case was , in effect, a religiously based one. This would violate so many provisions of the constitution that it would take a bunch of legal scholars years to unwind the threadball. Just because the bills sponsor is a representative, doesnt mean he knows anything..

Quote:
That suggests that Dover was a pyrrhic victory or,to put it another way, that anti-IDers prematurely ejaculated their boasting noises.

:


Wishful thinking shpendi. Unlike UK, our laws have a way of working themselves out eventually.
0 Replies
 
wandeljw
 
  1  
Mon 3 Jul, 2006 09:40 am
farmerman and spendi,
In my opinion, the bill will never become law. (The bill will never be approved by Congress.) I will try to keep this thread updated.
0 Replies
 
farmerman
 
  1  
Mon 3 Jul, 2006 09:49 am
True, but it'd be fun to watch the hearings, and having all the legal scholars explain to the committee reps about the Constitution.
0 Replies
 
spendius
 
  1  
Mon 3 Jul, 2006 09:56 am
It is possible for the judge and the jury to award "peppercorn" damages.

Somebody won a case here only last week and was awarded one penny damages. Obviously that saves him the other side's costs. It is for cases where the plaintiff is legalistically correct but the judge or jury thinks s/he was being frivolous as I think the Dover plaintiffs were.

The only fact we know for sure is that Dover taxpayers got stung for a million bucks and they got no gas or burgers in return. Most of them I mean. I guess hotel owners etc did okay. Ordinary workers I'm referring to.

We have a tradition whereby a taxpayer withholds a proportion of the tax demand and some of them end up in jail. An 80 year old woman did it only last week. She was sprung by a businessman who paid up for her.

What proportion of the Dover tax demand is going to pay for the case? Is it $10 per household or more?
0 Replies
 
farmerman
 
  1  
Mon 3 Jul, 2006 10:18 am
shpendi. You make it sound like the schoolboard was an innocent bystander..
The winners had waived most fees including the treble damages option. Indeed, the only people to actually be paid were the experts on both sides. The school district, once they realized that "somebody pays" immediately voted the schoolboard out because the board had the early option to settle and did not.
You may pity the poor taxpayers all you wish , but you cannot assess them the blame for the entire debaucle.They were fraudulently misrepresented by a couple of "thugs for Jesus"
IMO the members of the schoolboard, especially the president, secretary, solicitor, and school superintendent should also be sued for damages in a class action. I dont know why this hasnt been offered up. Well, they have 5 years in PA.

Token settlements are (or were) common in the US but thats "cuteness" of another era. In the age of DAubert(as opposed to Fry) and what's admissable in court , a civil case ,and with experts all facing voir dire and Daubert exclusions and being payed by the hour ,a case can easily run into millions.

The school board in Dover pushed a cynical agenda, one that was alreadys limited by a(actully 2) previous Supreme Court AND HAD 3 CASES IN pA AND A VERY RECENT RULING BY THE STATE ED BOARD LESS THAN THREE YEARS PRIOR.
Simple fact. -ID is religious based anti_science and anti -separation. If the Discovery Institute doesnt "get it" then they too will be enjoined in future cases. Ive not heard that Discovery Institute has offered to pay one cent for their involvement in the entire mess have you?, yet theyre the ones who picked up the stones for others to throw.
0 Replies
 
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Mon 3 Jul, 2006 10:22 am
Maybe spendi will offer up a pence or two and skip the pub a a few days to show his support for the IDiots. LOL
0 Replies
 
spendius
 
  1  
Mon 3 Jul, 2006 10:31 am
For once your LOL is justified.
0 Replies
 
farmerman
 
  1  
Mon 3 Jul, 2006 10:53 am
Sir, there is no surrebuttal there. Perhap you should eat more velveeta
0 Replies
 
spendius
 
  1  
Mon 3 Jul, 2006 11:15 am
Velveeta-

Quote:
Ingredients
milk
water
milkfat
whey
whey protein concentrate
sodium phosphate
milk protein concentrate
alginate
sodium citrate
apocarotenal (color)
annatto (color)
enzymes
benzoate
cheese culture


Is it like being shot in ultra slow-mo.
0 Replies
 
wandeljw
 
  1  
Mon 3 Jul, 2006 11:47 am
One more thing about the proposed bill: there may be a vote on it before the November elections. Republican congressmen are pushing several "American Values" types of bills as part of their re-election strategy.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

 
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.14 seconds on 10/12/2024 at 12:15:57