97
   

Intelligent Design Theory: Science or Religion?

 
 
wandeljw
 
  1  
Wed 3 May, 2006 09:04 am
CONFERENCE IN PHILADELPHIA (June 3 to June 7)

Quote:
PHILADELPHIA, May 2 /PRNewswire/ -- A new curriculum proposal for more effective science education and current perspectives on the evolution/intelligent design controversy highlight the Metanexus Institute's annual international conference on science and religion, June 3-7 on the campus of the University of Pennsylvania in Philadelphia. The conference, Continuity + Change: Perspectives on Science and Religion, presents leading international scholars whose work delves into important new and emerging ideas at the intersection of science and religion scholarship and research. Complete details are posted at:
http://www.metanexus.net/conference2006. Registration is available for a single session, an entire day, or the full conference.

The tension between continuity and change is not simply a philosophical conundrum; it is also at the root of the most pressing questions of our time. We wrestle with the tensions of tradition vs. innovation in the law, religious thought, and political life. The pace of change in scientific discovery, technological advancement, environmental transformation, and globalized culture is accelerating at such a dizzying rate that our abilities to cope are tested to the limits. The key to surviving and flourishing as human beings depends on how we find continuity and make the right choices in the midst of such rapid change.

Featured public sessions, co-sponsored by the Academy of Natural Sciences (Philadelphia), include:

Beyond Intelligent Design, Science Debates, and Culture Wars: A Teach-In on Evolution, Sunday, June 4. This day-long series of talks will investigate the question of the origins and evolution of life, taking into account scientific, theological, philosophical, historical, and political considerations, many of which impact education and public policy. Distinguished presenters and respondents for these sessions include Ian Barbour (Carleton College), John Haught (Georgetown University, the only theologian to testify in the Dover trial), George Ellis (University of Cape Town), and Nancey Murphy (Fuller Theological Seminary).

Teaching the History of Nature: Towards an Integrated Science Curriculum is the topic for discussion on Monday evening, June 5. As the world becomes ever more scientific and technological, Americans demonstrate not only declining scientific knowledge, but also the inability to effectively address philosophical, religious, and moral issues. To participate in a meaningful way in our democratic society, to make informed policy decisions that will affect not only our lives but also the world's future generations, we must transform our ways of educating and of learning. Our curriculum reform discussion will propose an integrated science curriculum organized around teaching of the history of nature as an effective framework that will enable students to better understand science, as well as important philosophical, religious, moral, and practical issues at the interface of science and society. Featured speakers are Ursula Goodenough (Washington University of St. Louis), George Ellis (University of Cape Town), and Dennis Cheek (Ewing Marion Kauffman Foundation).
0 Replies
 
spendius
 
  1  
Wed 3 May, 2006 10:52 am
Mr Grassie wrote this-

Quote:
If the only other choice we have is the literal reading of Richard Dawkins, however, then maybe we should stop teaching evolution altogether. Mere survival and reproduction do not provide adequate purposes for human aspirations. Too much of this kind of "truth" may not be wholesome for our children or society.


Why don't you all call Mr Grassie the names you have called me for making this important point although I usually miss out the "may not".


wande-Is Metanexus a budding new religion.

Until they face up to the alpha/beta/gamma problem and the personal autonomy/self-transcendence dichotomy I can't see them getting anywhere.

It sounds like a good gig though. Plenty of pollution looks on the cards and some real serious status symbols and power plays.

If they stick to Cambrian explosions and suchlike it will enable them to avoid the real issues which are psychological and sociological.

And never forget that they are writing their own spiel and I know what Foucault would have made of their language. At least Kyoto addressed here and now issues and that was meaningless apart from the piss-ups and the illicit sex.
0 Replies
 
Steve 41oo
 
  1  
Wed 3 May, 2006 11:11 am
Quote:
Mere survival and reproduction do not provide adequate purposes for human aspirations. Too much of this kind of "truth" may not be wholesome for our children or society.
Far better to lie to them and fill their innocent little heads with stories of punishment or paradise in the world to come. The writer gives the game away by putting "truth" in quotes....he cant handle it. And neither can you Spendy. Sorry.
0 Replies
 
Lightwizard
 
  1  
Wed 3 May, 2006 11:15 am
Their version of truth is what they wish to be true, much like what Santa will bring the for Christmas.
0 Replies
 
rosborne979
 
  1  
Wed 3 May, 2006 12:46 pm
wandeljw wrote:
No problem, rosborne!

(I am seriously concerned about farmerman. I hope he is able to report again after he comes out of surgery.)


Me too. I'll look forward to seeing him online again.
0 Replies
 
spendius
 
  1  
Wed 3 May, 2006 01:12 pm
Arthur Koestler wrote, acknowledging debts to Piaget and Freud--

"Until the end of the second or third year,while ego and noego are still incompletely divided,the child is unable to distinguish between the subjective and the objective between dream and reality, between the perceived and the imagined, between its thoughts and the things thought about. Children and primitives not only believe in magical transformation as it occurs in myths and fairy tales, but also believe themselves capable of performing it. ........(He gives examples)...

Psychological and physical causation are not yet separated; consequently, to wish for an event is the same as to produce it; the child implicitly believes in the omnipotence of thought. And as the thought becomes increasingly centred in verbal symbols, words become instruments of wishful evocation."

Hence to assert that an opponent in a debate is "stupid" or is "talking out of his arse" or has "been at the booze again" or "can't handle it" or any other of a long series of such empty assertions which have been seen on this thread, and many others, is evidence that the separation of the ego from the nonego remains incomplete even at much later stages than the third year.

I may even be guilty of it myself when I assert that I have made a much better job of sticking one up the CONFERENCE IN PHILADELPHIA than either of the last two posters neither of whom have any flesh on their simple assertions.

Steve wrote-

Quote:
Far better to lie to them and fill their innocent little heads with stories of punishment or paradise in the world to come.


That is not the choice Steve. The debate went past that long ago. Although I do understand why you refuse to address the real issues which are given in my last post. I don't recall anybody on this thread expressing a belief in heaven or hell or supporting anyone who attempts to get children to believe in such drivel.

How many fairy stories has your Government told you during your adult life. (To the nearest 10 thousand will do.)

"The truth is obscure
Too profound and too pure
To live it you have to explode..."

Journey Through Dark Heat...Bob Dylan.

Do you fancy a journey through dark heat Steve? Do you really wish to put the kids through one. Truth is undivided. It isn't in a supermarket display where you can pick out what you fancy.

When I was 8 we had a rather posh lady ranting and raving at me and my dear Mother because I had told her 5 year old offspring that there was no Father Christmas. Ranting and raving bigtime. For ages and ages.Posh ladies are really good at it once you get them fired up.
I wasn't taking a lot of notice though. I was busy tuning my short wave radio listening into ship to ship and ship to shore messages.

You don't want to end up like me do you?
0 Replies
 
Wolf ODonnell
 
  1  
Wed 3 May, 2006 01:20 pm
Funny that, you mentioning the flesh on assertions. I have yet to see the flesh on yours.
0 Replies
 
Setanta
 
  1  
Wed 3 May, 2006 01:23 pm
Bob "Dylan" (Zimmerman) is a putz. Think just what that makes of anyone who considers that this "musical" drivel has deep philosophical meaning.
0 Replies
 
Lightwizard
 
  1  
Wed 3 May, 2006 03:01 pm
One basing any of his life philosophy on Bob Dylan is in serious trouble.
0 Replies
 
farmerman
 
  1  
Wed 3 May, 2006 03:09 pm
As Rolling Stone classified Mr Zimmerman'The originatorof the Great Mind Phucque".

Operation went great, thanks for the concern, it was just a bit of an inconvenience to have no feeling and be told that a blood vessel and some nerve trunks were in the path of the moving piece of tungsten Carbide. I shall have to type and drive with my right hand for a few days,as they have my left arm straightjacketed to my body until maybe Monday.

I see that we have all assumed our correct places in the discussion. As Im still a bit drugged, I shall only read and try to unnerstand .
0 Replies
 
wandeljw
 
  1  
Wed 3 May, 2006 03:13 pm
Thanks for letting us know, farmerman!

Hope you feel better.

(maybe in your post-anesthesia state, you can understand spendi better than the rest of us)
0 Replies
 
xingu
 
  1  
Wed 3 May, 2006 03:17 pm
Quote:
(maybe in your post-anesthesia state, you can understand spendi better than the rest of us)


Maybe a little meth will help.
0 Replies
 
spendius
 
  1  
Wed 3 May, 2006 03:30 pm
Wolf wrote-

Quote:
Funny that, you mentioning the flesh on assertions. I have yet to see the flesh on yours.


Which one would you like to see the meat on? I'll do my best if you choose one.

LW wrote-

Quote:
One basing any of his life philosophy on Bob Dylan is in serious trouble.


I most certainly do not. You wouldn't catch me going around the world playing for a bunch of "fans" once I had a million in the bank.

It's just that he's read a lot and has a grasp of somethings and there's nothing wrong with listening to what somebody like that has to say. He's been around the block a few times. He has style too and can play a bit.
I have plenty of others.

But why would anybody think I was basing my life on Bob Dylan just because I quoted him a few times. I quoted TS Eliot earlier today on another thread. And Arthur Koestler. But Dylan says good things fast.He's a high grade compressor of meaning.

"Either I'm too sensitive or else I'm getting soft". See what I mean? 7 words.That's really fast.

All language is quoting.

Quoting fm-

Quote:
Operation went great,


Super dooper. I was dreading facing up to the gap if you hadn't pulled through fm. Really! Congratulations. I hope it wasn't too expensive.
0 Replies
 
farmerman
 
  1  
Wed 3 May, 2006 03:36 pm
It wasnt an organ transplant spendi. It was only an arthroscopico-neurologico-slug pulling.
0 Replies
 
farmerman
 
  1  
Wed 3 May, 2006 03:36 pm
Wandel----RIIIIIIGHHHT
0 Replies
 
Chumly
 
  1  
Wed 3 May, 2006 03:41 pm
spendius wrote:
All language is quoting.
I'll stick to the type of language intrinsic to intercourse, not quoting (double pun).
0 Replies
 
Lightwizard
 
  1  
Wed 3 May, 2006 03:52 pm
You do have to be careful with quotes. I'll stick to Mencken and Proust, that you--well, sometimes Fran Leibowitz or Gore Vidal. As far as the Dylans, it would be Dylan Thomas.
0 Replies
 
farmerman
 
  1  
Wed 3 May, 2006 03:56 pm
"I hate quotations, tell me what you know"--Emerson
0 Replies
 
Wolf ODonnell
 
  1  
Wed 3 May, 2006 04:00 pm
spendius wrote:
Wolf wrote-

Quote:
Funny that, you mentioning the flesh on assertions. I have yet to see the flesh on yours.


Which one would you like to see the meat on? I'll do my best if you choose one.


Choose any assertion you feel the most comfortable defending.
0 Replies
 
Lightwizard
 
  1  
Wed 3 May, 2006 04:08 pm
farmerman wrote:
"I hate quotations, tell me what you know"--Emerson


That's a good guideline. Cannot promise I will always follow it as I don't believe quotes are always literary crutches. (You just used one!)
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

 
Copyright © 2025 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.12 seconds on 07/08/2025 at 08:57:13