timberlandko wrote:If I thought there were anything to reincarnation, I'd peg spendi as this era's
Montague Summers.
Oh, I have read a book by Aleister Crowley many years ago.
wandeljw wrote:(chumly: i think spendius is not concerned about the scientific merits of either intelligent design or evolution. he simply feels that teaching evolution would somehow lead to moral corruption.)
I want to clarify what I said earlier about metaphysics. In religious terms, the intelligent designer would be a deity. In metaphysical terms, the intelligent designer would be a "first cause" or "prime mover".
The subjective perception of morality (or the lack thereof) is entirely irrelative to the fact of evolution (as I am sure you agree). To imply any congruence would be the equivalent of claiming the length of a woman's skirt is a function of a bacterium's adaptability.
As to your second point a so called "intelligent designer" need neither be a deity in religious terms nor a "first cause" or "prime mover" in metaphysical terms. Based on the assumption that the topic is real in any sense whatsoever (which I question given my understanding of space-time and cosmological causality) I would argue that man's own future science/technology has just as much veracity (if not more) for being a cause (ultimate or sequential) as does your two ideas.
Chumly, With biotech and DNA research, your opinion about man's influence in this world makes more sense than any theistic creator/mover.
Chum wrote-
Quote: To imply any congruence would be the equivalent of claiming the length of a woman's skirt is a function of a bacterium's adaptability.
And no self respecting bacterium would have it anywhere but at least half way up the back.
What's your definition of a woman Chum. A scientific one if you don't mind. We don't want any shilly-shallying. This is a scientific thread.
Hmm
. I'll offer a triple pun on women's moods, a sexual position and a book:
Even Reverse Cowgirls Get the Blues
Even Cowgirls Get the Blues
Reverse Cowgirl
They are pretty sensible these northern English folk.
Millfield High is close to Blackpool and connected with British Aerospace so you have the two extremes of human endeavour.
Chum-not a very satisfactory definition I'm afraid for a scientific mind of a word you used yourself.
Quote:spendius wrote:
timber wrote-
Quote:
If I thought there were anything to reincarnation, I'd peg spendi as this era's Montague Summers.
Tried him. Totally unreadable. Not a spark to set my gas on fire.
That speaks well for evolution.
Of course I have read his translation of Malleus Malificarum. I have a first edition. That was written in the 15th century by Bishops Kramer and Sprenger and despite its turgidity is a useful book for those interested in Christian theology.
wande quoted-
Quote: However, young people are poorly served by deliberate attempts to withhold, distort or misrepresent scientific knowledge and understanding in order to promote particular religious beliefs."
Might I refer readers to Post No 2005232 on page 512 for a clarification of "poorly served" which is a bald assertion in the context and,in general,naive.
Steve Jones and John MacKay (?) have just now been arguing on BBC Radio 2. Quite funny really.
Listeners are being invited to contribute to fill in between MOR music.
Spendius,
Have you ever dialogued with RexRed? It would be very interesting indeed. He hangs
here. A clash of the titans, or a meeting of the minds, time awaits.
No I haven't ever dialogued with RR Chum.
Why do you think it would be interesting?
I don't know about Titans but I suppose it is possible that we might not see eye-to-eye on some things. The only reason he goes round and round in circles is that he can't resist doing so when you lot of Godless infidels provoke him and then you start going around as well.
I have given my version of intelligent design over the posts and last week in particular. It's a theological problem. That is to say a combination of sociology and psychology. That's why I'm incoherent. I don't give a sod what I think. At the moment I'm thinking I'll be in the pub in half an hour watching the monkeys. It's no good watching myself or my mates because all we are doing is getting tanked up and that's boring. Usually I mean but Vic's wife has kicked him out finally after a five month struggle so it livened up a bit but that's much too long a story to tell on here fascinating though it is.
Are you suggesting I am a godless wild dog, part of an encircling pack of ravenous atheistic heathens, tearing at the moral fiber of poor innocent RexRed, and that through all this, somehow, alcoholic spirits are the answer to the negative implications of evolution, and that you refuse to come to RexREd's service?
Does Vic's wife have religious beliefs?
I don't really know Chum. I only ever had one brief conversation with her which seemed to be focussed on self-aggrandisment.
If I could get evens on "no" I might consider putting half my property on it as long as assertions don't count as evidence.
wande-
I've been checking around on Ms Smith as a result of you bringing the tweeter into this debate and I think she is a part of that Guardian/The Independent/The Observer bag of tricks. Perhaps you are not aware of what they stand for but I am and I can't say I'm all that enthusiastic about it.
Chum and spendi. There is a thread over a few feet from here that is entitled "Worst opening lines for a novel". I would suggest that you both try your hands, feel that, with both of your latest contributions , you would give the others quite a run. (We colonials have to struggle to write poorly, whereas It seems to come naturally to you of British descent)
Well fm-
Dylan's a Russian and Veblen had English as a second language and both of them are way out beyond anything I can do.
It's to do with being accurate.Scientific if you like.
From the gulag of Bemidji.
farmerman wrote: From the gulag of Bemidji.
Yup, up there in the empty, ice-bound, snow-swept, wind-blasted steppes of Minnesota. Hardy folks thereabouts.