If you think my argument is based on simple complexity, then you aren't able to understand it. Nor are you able to cite any fallacy in it.
Asking me to cite a source for that 'dogma' i mentioned, is like someone asking a physicist to cite where he got the second law of thermodynamics from. It just proves the questioner is unfamiliar with that field of science.
But if you can prove im wrong about that 'dogma' , or that there is no such thing, THEN you would have a point.
May I ask what fields of science you feel competent in?