@farmerman,
All Apisa is saying is that if you can't rule out God you can't rule out design. Even if the design is a load of Pollocks.
I can't see what there is to argue about. Rule out God first. Not as a faith. Doing that concedes the case to the other side. Or other sides.
Setanta's spurious dribbling about a God and not a design is neither here nor there. It assumes we are all stupid which I suppose is understandable in someone who thinks we all are. Which he must do to present such an argument for our consideration. If he doesn't think we are stupid then it must be him who is.
Still relying on the assertions I see. Don't think there is any non-repetitive aspect to assertions from one end of the thread to the other simply because the wording is changed. Sometimes.
If I do repeat myself occasionally it is because you will neither accept an obvious point nor rebut it. And that is certainly not science. It's ******* indignation.
And until you kneel at the altar rails, repent and beg forgiveness there is nothing you can do about changing.