97
   

Intelligent Design Theory: Science or Religion?

 
 
hingehead
 
  2  
Tue 1 Oct, 2013 04:19 pm
@Frank Apisa,
Quote:
I see the entire thing, Hingehead. I am trying to get you to see it also.


You think you see the big picture but I suspect you are just sitting too close to the screen.
spendius
 
  1  
Tue 1 Oct, 2013 04:48 pm
@hingehead,
Turn it up himge eh? There's a good chap. You're not saying anything. You are just regurgitating idiotic cliches somebody fed you.

Swallowing them was your big mistake.
0 Replies
 
spendius
 
  1  
Tue 1 Oct, 2013 04:59 pm
@spendius,
Come on fm. Explain the scientific validity of ignorant assertions like man-made global warming is BS.
spendius
 
  1  
Tue 1 Oct, 2013 05:18 pm
@spendius,
Isn't Obarmy asserting that AHC is a good thing?
0 Replies
 
farmerman
 
  1  
Tue 1 Oct, 2013 05:19 pm
@spendius,
why not try to eat one sammich at a time?
spendius
 
  1  
Tue 1 Oct, 2013 05:25 pm
@farmerman,
Are you a bit shy fm?
0 Replies
 
farmerman
 
  4  
Tue 1 Oct, 2013 05:37 pm
@hingehead,
this was a pretty good thread with lots of good stuff. It was followed by another of wandells threads on educational challenges IF id were "upheld" as science in District III.

Im resigning from this thread cause theres no longer a point. Its just one poster who is insisting that hes making a point that's valid to this thread and hes missed the point entirely. However, Does that even give him pause to reconsider his point?
Not a bit!.
I don't think hes stupid, he's just unable and unwilling to analyze what hes saying objectively. Hes got too much macho involved to say anything differently.

Then, of course theres our little yap dog spendi.



edgarblythe
 
  1  
Tue 1 Oct, 2013 05:41 pm
In nomine Patris et Filii et Spiritus Sancti
Amen
Frank Apisa
 
  1  
Tue 1 Oct, 2013 05:45 pm
@hingehead,
hingehead wrote:

Quote:
I see the entire thing, Hingehead. I am trying to get you to see it also.


You think you see the big picture but I suspect you are just sitting too close to the screen.


Whatever.
hingehead
 
  1  
Tue 1 Oct, 2013 05:53 pm
@Frank Apisa,
Another well thought out argument, Frank?

Must be all the spaghetti in your system.
Frank Apisa
 
  1  
Tue 1 Oct, 2013 05:53 pm
@farmerman,
farmerman wrote:

this was a pretty good thread with lots of good stuff. It was followed by another of wandells threads on educational challenges IF id were "upheld" as science in District III.

Im resigning from this thread cause theres no longer a point. Its just one poster who is insisting that hes making a point that's valid to this thread and hes missed the point entirely. However, Does that even give him pause to reconsider his point?
Not a bit!.
I don't think hes stupid, he's just unable and unwilling to analyze what hes saying objectively. Hes got too much macho involved to say anything differently.

Then, of course theres our little yap dog spendi.


If my point is unimportant and invalid...why have so many people spent so much time on it.

It is valid...and it does have bearing on the issue.

Some of you people are suggesting (some rather subtly)…that intelligent design is not possible…that it is impossible.

It is not.

IF there is the possibility of a GOD…there is the possibility of intelligent design.

That is a given.

Why are you people claiming I should not be using “if”; that my argument is illogical; that I should not be making it because “god” is not testable; that I am making a fool of myself…and all that nonsense?

Why, by this time, have you all not simply conceded that IF there is the possibility of a GOD…there is the possibility of intelligent design?


Frank Apisa
 
  1  
Tue 1 Oct, 2013 05:54 pm
@hingehead,
hingehead wrote:

Another well thought out argument, Frank?

Must be all the spaghetti in your system.


Whatever.
0 Replies
 
cicerone imposter
 
  2  
Tue 1 Oct, 2013 06:16 pm
@Frank Apisa,
If if if if if if if if ...... is a mindless pursuit of nothing when it cannot be tested.
BillRM
 
  1  
Tue 1 Oct, 2013 06:18 pm
@cicerone imposter,
The keyword in your posting stand out IE mindless.
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Tue 1 Oct, 2013 06:19 pm
@BillRM,
If that's so, why did you even bother to respond? LOL

You like mindless pursuits?
0 Replies
 
Frank Apisa
 
  1  
Tue 1 Oct, 2013 06:29 pm
@cicerone imposter,
cicerone imposter wrote:

If if if if if if if if ...... is a mindless pursuit of nothing when it cannot be tested.


Yeah...you seem to think it is a mindless pursuit of nothing.

I think it to be quite the opposite.

I am continuing this conversation because I do not see it as a "mindless pursuit of nothing."

Can you explain why you are continuing?
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Tue 1 Oct, 2013 06:42 pm
@Frank Apisa,
I can be as stubborn as you! What other reason can there possibly be? Mr. Green

Frank, if there's a heaven, do they have oranges there?
Let me know when you figure out how to test it.
Frank Apisa
 
  1  
Tue 1 Oct, 2013 06:47 pm
@cicerone imposter,
cicerone imposter wrote:

I can be as stubborn as you! What other reason can there possibly be? Mr. Green


Beats me. If I found something to be "mindless pursuit"...I normally would abandon it.

But do stick around. I not only do not think this is "mindless pursuit"...I think there is something with potential productivity for you. Your stubbornness may pay off.

Quote:


Frank, if there's a heaven, do they have oranges there?
Let me know when you figure out how to test it.


Why would I want to test it?

Why would testing it be necessary?

cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Tue 1 Oct, 2013 07:00 pm
@Frank Apisa,
Same with your query about "If there is a go...."

Quote:
Why would I want to test it?

Why would testing it be necessary?


Because "it" can't be tested. Get it?
The "necessary" doesn't qualify as a rational answer, because it simply cannot be tested. In other words, it's not a choice.
Frank Apisa
 
  1  
Wed 2 Oct, 2013 03:10 am
@cicerone imposter,
cicerone imposter wrote:

Same with your query about "If there is a go...."

Quote:
Why would I want to test it?

Why would testing it be necessary?


Because "it" can't be tested. Get it?
The "necessary" doesn't qualify as a rational answer, because it simply cannot be tested. In other words, it's not a choice.


That makes no sense.

No one here is implying that it is impossible for oranges to exist in heaven...if there is a heaven.

There are people here who are implying there is no possibility of intelligent design.

I am merely pointing out that IF there is the possibility of a GOD...there is the possibility of intelligent design.

If someone were suggesting there is no possibility of oranges in heaven (IF there is a heaven)...I might point out:

If there is the possibility of a heaven...there is the possibility that there are oranges in heaven.
 

Related Topics

 
Copyright © 2025 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.11 seconds on 01/11/2025 at 06:48:52