Intelligent Design Theory: Science or Religion?

Quote:

But of course that would not negate what I am acutally saying in my comment:

IF there is the possibility of a GOD...there is the possibility of intelligent design.

And Frank is tacitly acknowledging it's possible the moon is made of orange juice.

Test it!

I did and found it ridiculous.

I'm multi-talented. I can wait AND ask you to disprove the moon is made of orange juice or admit it is possible.

(ironic isn't it?)

Oh no, Frank, you can't get off that easily.

Essentially, you have a concept of god, and it's the god of the Jews.

You are assuming a creator god, and you've spent a lot of time telling us what god would be like, if there were a god, which you don't know exists.

Continuing to call me names doesn't alter that there is no logic in your position, and that you continue to describe a god which you obsessively say you don't know exists.

More to the point, there is no logical reason to assume that if a god did exist, it would have "intelligently designed" any life form...

...-that's a logical non sequitur. Farmerman was right about your feeble arguments.

More to the point, there is no logical reason to assume that if a god did exist, it would have "intelligently designed" any life form--that's a logical non sequitur.

While you claim not to know that any god exists, you know that god is male, that there is just the one--not gods, but god--and that god would use intelligent design to "create" life on earth. You're a fraud, Frank, but we've known that for years. Logic doesn't enter into your silliness.

As for why we spend so much time on your bullsh*t . . . well, hell, it's a slow day. If you paid attention, which is not something i'm entirely sure you're capable of, you'd notice that i stopped talking to you yesterday afternoon, and didn't address you again until this morning. Furthermore, that hours go by with no response to your BS from me, and from others here. You're certainly not as important as you seem to think you are. You're just the dog being dangled on a lazy day.

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ykdRI3LVHvU[/youtube]

Frank thinks hes being "intellectually honest".Hed actually be funny if he understood his silly position.MEANWHILE, back in the real world.

1In Kansas, the IDers and CREATIONISTS (The CRETINISTS, spendi) have filed suit against the new"MINIMUM" science stndards for public schools (WHATEVER HAPPENED TO EXCELLENCE?). The suit has been filed under "Academic freedoms" acts. SO, without any reasoning, the stupid A2K "fun and games" arguments that Frnk is making,can actually be taught AS SCIENCE. If it wins in court.
There will probably be yet another case like Dover just to satisfy the limited needs for Religious Control espoused by the IDers and Cretinists.

(Be very aware of what you speak Frank, it,... even as silly as it is,... probably has a well moneyed and politically astute constituency in fly-over country).

No, the comment is not logical. There is no logical connection between the existence of a deity and the concept of intelligent design. It doesn't surprise me at all that you don't understand that.

No logic there at all, other than the "logic" that anything and everything is possible. Such as that the moon is made of orange juice.