2
   

Death Penalty Opponents, This Is Who You Champion

 
 
Eorl
 
  1  
Reply Wed 27 Apr, 2005 03:26 am
Re: Death Penalty Opponents, This Is Who You Champion
In response to the original post:

Lusatian wrote:
the perpetrators murdered human beings (sometimes many more than one), in premeditated, cold, disregard for the natural laws of human society.


This quote could be used to describe the executioners appointed to the task of conducting the murder...sorry the "execution" of the criminal and it is just one reason why I am opposed to the death penalty.

Also, to propose that taking a position against a penalty is somehow "championing" those who may face it is ridiculous.
0 Replies
 
joefromchicago
 
  1  
Reply Wed 27 Apr, 2005 08:20 am
timberlandko wrote:
I gotta say too that "they might escape" is a straw man argument.

No it's not. It's a bad argument, to be sure, but it's not a strawman argument. Every strawman argument is a bad argument, but not all bad arguments are strawman arguments.
0 Replies
 
old europe
 
  1  
Reply Wed 27 Apr, 2005 09:24 am
Setanta wrote:
"Supermax?" Are you making this up as you go along? I've never in my life heard of a "supermax" prison--and your contention that "the US is the only country with so many 'supermax' prisons" reeks of someone's sensationalist televison or pulp journal story.


1 minute to google this up...

Quote:
D Super-Max or Maxi-Maxi Prisons

In the United States, the highest security-level facilities are super-max or maxi-maxi prisons. Also called "control units," these prisons or areas within prisons have extraordinarily severe restrictions. Human contact is minimal. Inmates are kept in solitary confinement in small (typically six feet by eight feet) cells for long periods each day. They eat alone in their cells. No opportunities for work or socialization exist. Outdoor recreation is permitted only once a week. Restraints such as leg irons are used whenever inmates leave their cells.


source

Will admit that I don't know anything about the US prison classification system, though.
0 Replies
 
Setanta
 
  1  
Reply Wed 27 Apr, 2005 09:58 am
Oh fer chrissake . . . do have the courtesy not to pelt me with media gobble-dee-gook in the course of such a discourse as the one which unfolds here. The Microsoft network and Encarta Encyclopedia . . . of course, why didn't i think of that. The very fount of wisdumb.

The relative degree of security provided by any prison anywhere (a topic you have relentlessly shoved down the collective throat of the audience here) is meaningless to my "putting down a mad dog" position. Do try to keep that in mind.
0 Replies
 
old europe
 
  1  
Reply Wed 27 Apr, 2005 10:07 am
Quote:
In super-maximum security prisons, inmates are often locked alone in their cells for up to twenty-three-and-a-half hours a day. They eat and exercise alone, live under extraordinary levels of surveillance and control, and have little or no opportunity for education or vocational training. Although U.S. prisons have always had harsh solitary confinement cells to which prisoners are sent for a few days or weeks to be punished, a new generation of these "supermax" prisons are imposing extreme social isolation on prisoners for years.

Instead of looking for ways to help disruptive or dangerous prisoners develop the ability to live with other human beings, more and more correctional systems eager to prove that they are tough on crime are turning to "high-tech cages" with little regard for the effects that their inhumane conditions have on the mental and physical health of the prisoners.


... from the the Human Rights Watch website.

Of course arguing for or against death penalty is a somehow different topic. Nevertheless the US are one of the few countries in the world that still have capital punishment, the US is the country with the biggest prison population percentagewise, and the US is the country with the biggest prison population in absolute numbers.

It seems to me that the whole mentality is revealing. "Putting down a mad dog" is as removed from the high moral grounds often claimed on other occassions as it gets.
0 Replies
 
Setanta
 
  1  
Reply Wed 27 Apr, 2005 10:10 am
I've claimed no moral ground, high or low, in the course of this discussion. However, with your moral nose in the air, you are bent on protraying the United States as a primitive, vicious society in which cruelty abounds, and half the citizenry locks up the other half in some sort of ritualistic frenzy of incarceration.

If you just want to rant on about how bad you think things are in the United States, why not just start a thread under the rubric: "Why I think America is a nightmarish place to live, even though i don't live there."
0 Replies
 
old europe
 
  1  
Reply Wed 27 Apr, 2005 11:34 am
Setanta wrote:
If you just want to rant on about how bad you think things are in the United States, why not just start a thread under the rubric: "Why I think America is a nightmarish place to live, even though i don't live there."


I think indeed that certain aspects of the US society are something to worry about. I don't think that makes the United States a specifically nightmarish place. I have been living and working there for quite some time, but even if I hadn't I would probably critizise some aspects. I've been living and working in enough corners of the world to not identify myself completely with any country or 'society' in particular. True for Europe as well. So if you want to adress certain aspects in Europe, even though you don't live here, feel invited. On the other hand, if you think everything's fine all around the world, we can leave it at that as well.
0 Replies
 
joefromchicago
 
  1  
Reply Wed 27 Apr, 2005 12:30 pm
Ticomaya wrote:
As far as the "implications" that liberals want the US to fail in Iraq, I was simply referring to that other thread where joefromchicago asked: "So, can an American want the United States to lose the war in Iraq and still be patriotic? Yes. And I am one of those Americans."

I resent being called a "liberal."

I'm a radical.
0 Replies
 
Setanta
 
  1  
Reply Wed 27 Apr, 2005 12:30 pm
Inasmuch, Tico, as you don't have a clue what "political camp" i occupy, but have once again made assumptions from which you proceed to argue, your comment about "those who continuously bash the US" is meaningless to me. What JoefromtheWindyCity wrote on the subject is also not relevant to any discussion of my attitudes. I enlisted in the United States Army, and completed every day of the term specified in the enlistment, and the Army were pleased to characterize my service as honorable. I served in a war which i considered illegal and immoral, but having a stronger sense of what is due my nation, i served nonetheless. I consider the current war to be immoral and illegal. I am appalled at the casualties we continually suffer due to the want of basic military necessities, and mourn the loss of our soldiers. I find contentions such as yours, especially when delivered in a context which does not refer to one's attitudes toward that war, to be an egregious effort to insult one's interlocutors. I therefore find your repeated attempts to take a moralizing position about how one addresses other members here to be the height of hypocricy. And, i therefore hold you in contempt. O'George and I almost never agree on politics--i do not hold him in contempt. Big Bird and i almost never agree on politics--i do not hold him in contempt. But then, neither of them seem to feel it necessary to throw out elliptical insults, and indulge in denigrating innuendo--something which i see you doing constantly. In my estimation, you hope to portray yourself as the soul of reason, and a paragon of restraint, and all while hoping that your comments will elicit an insulting rejoinder. I am only too happy to accomodate you.
0 Replies
 
Setanta
 
  1  
Reply Wed 27 Apr, 2005 12:33 pm
Hear hear, Joe . . .
0 Replies
 
Walter Hinteler
 
  1  
Reply Wed 27 Apr, 2005 12:35 pm
<Joe conducted the Radicalinzky march, when he was in Vienna!>
0 Replies
 
joefromchicago
 
  1  
Reply Wed 27 Apr, 2005 12:50 pm
Walter: Laughing

Ticomaya: It is certainly unfair to insinuate that Setanta, let alone all liberals, took the same position that I took in the "I want the US to lose the war in Iraq" thread; Set didn't even participate in that thread.
0 Replies
 
Ticomaya
 
  1  
Reply Wed 27 Apr, 2005 12:59 pm
joefromchicago wrote:
Walter: Laughing

Ticomaya: It is certainly unfair to insinuate that Setanta, let alone all liberals, took the same position that I took in the "I want the US to lose the war in Iraq" thread; Set didn't even participate in that thread.


I've not suggested Setanta took that position ... but a lot of liberals did. That was my point that I raised in that other thread which Set is referring to, where ....

D'artagnan wrote:
How come it's the right wingers who get to determine who is and isn't patriotic?


and I responded with ...

Tico wrote:
Because you leftists think it's patriotic to want the US to lose the war in Iraq .. you obviously can't be trusted to determine who is patriotic for yourselves.



http://www.able2know.com/forums/viewtopic.php?p=1303717#1303717
0 Replies
 
blatham
 
  1  
Reply Wed 27 Apr, 2005 06:09 pm
"...in the instinctive belief of many ordinary Americans - the default mode of humanity is to become Americans." (Anatol Lieven, America Right or Wrong, page 66)

Thus, all American policy ought to come to fruition, any contestation or disagreement with American policy is mistaken or traitorous, and any and all wars begun by America ought to be won by America regardless of any other factor. What could be more clear?
0 Replies
 
dlowan
 
  1  
Reply Thu 28 Apr, 2005 03:05 am
Indeed. Pathetic.
0 Replies
 
edgarblythe
 
  1  
Reply Thu 28 Apr, 2005 04:37 am
What? I thought all people knew the USA came about by means of immaculate conception.
0 Replies
 
goodfielder
 
  1  
Reply Thu 28 Apr, 2005 04:47 am
blatham wrote:
"...in the instinctive belief of many ordinary Americans - the default mode of humanity is to become Americans." (Anatol Lieven, America Right or Wrong, page 66)

Thus, all American policy ought to come to fruition, any contestation or disagreement with American policy is mistaken or traitorous, and any and all wars begun by America ought to be won by America regardless of any other factor. What could be more clear?


At the moment yes. It seems that the Bushii have developed that idea and taken it to ridiculous heights but would that have pertained under President Kerry? Did it pertain under Clinton? Will it pertain under the next President Clinton?
0 Replies
 
McGentrix
 
  1  
Reply Thu 28 Apr, 2005 06:27 am
edgarblythe wrote:
What? I thought all people knew the USA came about by means of immaculate conception.


No, just the conservatives. The others are spawned elsewhere.
0 Replies
 
blatham
 
  1  
Reply Thu 28 Apr, 2005 07:08 am
goodfielder wrote:
blatham wrote:
"...in the instinctive belief of many ordinary Americans - the default mode of humanity is to become Americans." (Anatol Lieven, America Right or Wrong, page 66)

Thus, all American policy ought to come to fruition, any contestation or disagreement with American policy is mistaken or traitorous, and any and all wars begun by America ought to be won by America regardless of any other factor. What could be more clear?


At the moment yes. It seems that the Bushii have developed that idea and taken it to ridiculous heights but would that have pertained under President Kerry? Did it pertain under Clinton? Will it pertain under the next President Clinton?


gf

It isn't that this Bush administration has 'developed' this presumption of America's place in the world. This is a modern face on an old creature, but yes, it is an extreme version. Jesse Helms speaking to the UN
Quote:
"...states, above all the United States, that are democratic, and act in the cause of liberty, possess unlimited authority, subject to no external control, to carry out military adventures."


But preceding this modern era we see Woodrow Wilson, during WW1, saying
Quote:
"America had the infinite privilege of fulfilling her destiny and saving the world".


The messianist nationalism we see in full bloom presently is a story that goes back to the settlement of America and the revolution. One can draw a pretty clear parallel (and many historians have) between the protestant renewal movements common to American history (our version of bare-bones faith is the true version and it is our duty to spread it throughout the world, overtuning the old, jaded, encumbered and false christian pretender faiths) and the nationalism spawned of violent revolution. The consequence being a long-standing myth framework of something like "We are the Champions of the world - about politics and about god".

And it is - in odd contrast to America's own myths - often really quite a severe nationalism demanded of the citizenry with intolerance of dissent a central feature. Even De Toqueville comments here
Quote:
"I know of no country where there is so little true independence of mind and freedom of discussion as in America...The majority raises very formidable barriers to the liberty of opinion; within these barriers and author may write whatever he pleases, but he will repent if he ever step beyond them."


So this isn't a Bush or a Republican or a 21st century phenomenon. This is merely a pinnacle of the lunatic aspects - a sort of full moon period for America.
0 Replies
 
goodfielder
 
  1  
Reply Thu 28 Apr, 2005 07:54 am
Thanks for that blatham - perhaps then there have been periods when this super-nationalism has been muted but I take your point concerning its enduring nature.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.04 seconds on 12/24/2024 at 06:55:43