puglia wrote:This is a spiritual, religion debate site right?
This is a website for all manner of discussion, puglia, having at the moment something over 1.3 million articles spread across some 50,000-plus topics distributed among 12 categories comprising more than 60 forums, with a member list approaching 40,000, recording tens of thousands of page views from several thousand unique visitors, representing every continent exept Antarctica (and we've had members visit there) and receiving thousands of posts per day, every day. Lots of server power, and lots and lots of bandwidth. Its pretty much whatever you want it to be.
Quote:OK Timbo you are absolutely missing the point.
I beg to differ - In this particular discussion, I cut straight to the point.
Quote:When these things occur to YOU and you are healed than you are left with no choice by facing reality and validating responsibility.
Nonsense. The unexplained does not entail superstitious assumptions of causality. That something is unexplained means merely insufficient data is at hand to formulate a reasonable, logical explanation. Some folks, however, simply can't bring themselves to admit "I don't know", so they leap at fantastic, comforting psuedosolutions, solutions bereft of logic, empirical evidence, and at odds with mankind's assembled body of knowledge. Theology is merely philosophy with rituals. Science is philosophy stripped for action.
Quote:Have you read the book of Enoch?
Which version? The Charles translation of the Ethiopic texts, or the Lawrence translation, the Milik translation of the Qumran texts? Or, perhaps, do you refer to the Slavic, or the Orthodox texts? Why, yes, I have, all of them, and assorted versions and translations of the various canonical Bibles, and the rest of The Apocrypha and Pseudepigrapha of both testaments, as well as much critique, discussion, and commentary thereunto related Have you?
Quote: have you ever considered that even with todays technology we couldn't duplicate what was built during the Mayan run.
Poppycock. To exactly reproduce a Mayan temple or an Egyptian pyramid, a medieval cathedral, a moated, fortified stone castle, the Great Wall of China, or the Panama Canal would be cost-prohibitive, but quite doable. You dig up the funding and secure the necessary land and permits, and I'll oversee the contracting.
Quote:Is it not a valid question since we have no acceptable valid answer.
That there is no valid answer does not invalidate the question by any means. That means simply, and by definition, that the question remains unanswered. That the question might remain unanswered for so long as it has indicates at the very least there is no easy answer, and leads to suspicion the answer well may be at hand, and in the negative. Still, the question remains unanswered, the proposition remains unproven despite much passion and zeal and great effort in the matter of its discovery. There is as yet, and may never be, an answer. And then, "No"
IS an answer ... perhaps thats staring us in the face. There is scant weight for the "Yes" argument - none, in fact, outside its promoters - while reams and reams of documentation counters the proposition and continues to build.
Quote: If mainstream media and the aluminati do not accept it, you will never hear about it; unless you overturn every stone and find it yourself
Poppycock again. That there is no evidence does not mean the media and"aluminati" (actually, that would be
Illuminati) "do not accept" anything; it means nothing to support the proposition has been proven in forensically sound, academically valid, independently reproducible and verifiable manner. There is nothing to reject.
Quote:Also I cite as a very relevant scripture ... <snip> ... I'm ready to shift gears, we will soon explore the connection between the spoken word and the biohologram, as well as how it relates to the embryonic stem cell and the molecular transformations that occur through accoustics.
Please feel free to shift gears; while I see no reason to expect it will be so, it is possible changing your applied torque might result in less wheelspin. You're getting nowhere with what you've got right now.
Quote:... This is a good place ...
Some here think so - we try, and we enjoy what there is here. That's why we're here.
Help if you wish and are able. You won't find much of a fanclub for proselytizing and preaching, though.
Quote:And actually not as harsh as I thought it would be.
Not harsh at all - quite the contrary, in fact; civil, reasoned, tolerant, and inquisitive ... though with relatively rigorous standards for debate and foundation thereof. Around here, burden of proof is a big thing, and around here, the burden of proof lies with the proponent of the proposition. If you state a case, be not dismayed to be called upon to make that case, and be likewise not dismayed should demand be made of you to adhere to forensically sound, academically valid, independently verifiable manner of support for your proposition. Circular logic, solely self-referencing "validation", and diversionary responses don't carry any weight here at all.
Quote:Ascension is the goal
Hmmmmmm .... well, whatever gets ya high.