I wonder how it will go.
On the one hand, you would expect Hahn, as an old-fashioned, bland Democrat, to pick up most of Hertzberg's voters when the alternative is a Latino leftist.
But on the other hand, most of the accounts seem to focus on voters who want "change" or "a fresh face" after Hahn's bleary first term and lack of results. And a lot of Hertzberg's voters seem mostly angry about the air of corruption around Hahn - which would suggest they might now vote for the other anti-Hahn, the untainted Villaraigosa.
And what about the African-American voters - will they revert to their loyalty to Hahn or do they feel betrayed enough to vote against him? Or will they just stay at home? Same goes for Valley voters, really.
In a way, if Villaraigosa does win, it's actually in line with the Ahnold victory. Not ideologically, of course, but in that it would continue the trend of instinctive, insurrectionist voting. Hahn does kinda sound a bit like Gray Davis.
Talking Davis, it might be interesting, with the question of what Parks' voters will do in mind, to remember how he fared. His comfortable win in '98 came courtesy of an electorate that was 13% black. In 2002, the black share of the electorate declined to 4 percent - and Davis barely scraped in. They just stayed home.
That tidbit is from
an old thread of BBB's on the recall election, which also has this on the state's Latino voters:
Quote:In a major poll conducted last fall by the Pew Hispanic Center, Latinos parted company from both whites and blacks in favoring (by a 55 percent to 38 percent margin) a bigger government that taxes more to provide a high level of services over a smaller government that taxes less and provides fewer services. Even Latino Republicans backed a high-taxing big government. Similarly, we know from exit polling on a 1998 ballot measure that California Latinos are the most staunchly pro-union group in the California electorate (slightly more so, in fact, than union members themselves).
More grit to the mill of Villaraigosa's campaign. With the unpopular Hahn on the ticket, turnout might be low - in which case Latino enthusiasm about Villaraigosa will count double.
Hey, who knows? In 2001, Villaraigosa got as much as 46% against Hahn's 54% (
election map here).