parados wrote:RexRed wrote:parados wrote:Quote:Principles of biblical research
Before one even starts there has to be a belief that it is "The word of God" and is perfect. Scientifically accurate and mathematically precise. Not on the outside but on the inside.
So thus God has a meaning for every word where when and how he uses it.
Does this mean God has a purpose when the words are missing too?
Lots of the scripture is interpolated to make up for missing sections in the original documents. If it is PERFECT, then the missng words must be intentional. Why don't the scholars keep that in the translations?
How about the fact that the original Aramic has no word for wife? Shouldn't that have meaning? Doesn't it make it perfectly clear that God never intended for man to marry?
I believe the figure is hypokadistasis (spelling from memory) or emphasis by omission... This is used in the Bible many times. Missing words are usually intentional. There are many checks and balances in the word that demonstrate a clear picture of what spirituality is and how to utilize the spirit. The basics are evident in the Bible and the miscellaneous are there to speculate on... As to God wanting marriage or not... I believe that God wants love to conqueror hypocrisy... Sometimes that is marriage sometimes it is abstinence we learn the difference when we walk by the spirit and learn what it has to teach our own hearts and minds... Shall anyone compare to the virtue of God?
So God uses words for a purpose and doesn't use words for a purpose. But YOU get to decide what that purpose is. OK. Got it.
We can't argue with someone that is just RIGHT no matter what. I suggest that you are NOT God nor do you know the mind of God. You are just another confused sinner that is trying to justify his own sins by bastardizing the bible to his own purposes.
What the heck are you talking about? Where did I say that people have to listen to me? I listen to what the Bible says and, I did not write the book. I have said that people need to "study" the scriptures and let the scriptures interpret themselves... I also presented some principles on "how" to let the word "interpret itself"...
If you think you are right about something in the Bible then give me chapter and verse... I did not say that if words are missing then you only just listen to me, because only I know the truth...
I know the truth because I have read and studied the Bible for years... If there is a figure of speech and a word is missing... then God has possibly chosen to omit the word to emphasize it. It certainly deserves thought. Because God could have just written the word in and been done with it. God could say the ground is dry... but, when God says the ground is thirsty, God does it to give the ground human characteristics.
Thus God uses figures of speech to emphasize certain things. This is not something that one needs to guess at... There are over 500 figures of speech used in the Bible and sometimes 200 varieties of each. The Greeks had a single word for over 500 different figures of speech alone. Figures of speech like giving God human characteristics (the mouth of God, the finger of God, God saw...) when God has no form at all and cannot be seen...
I don't know where you got the idea that I would want anyone to go to the Bible and just make stuff up... The idea is to understand what "it" is trying to say and not what you want it to say...
I can only guess that this is what you accuse Christians of when you don't know what else to say...