RexRed wrote:Ok, In science every time we try to look at physical light it "disappears"... so are we to surmise from this that light does not exist? Since we have never been able to look at a light "particle" then how can we say it exists?
Are you really going to put forth that light actually does not exist?
No, science is not hampered by the "disappearance" of light. The inferential evidence is overwhelming, and can produce physical results which one can hold in one's hand. The next time there's an eclipse, take two sheets of paper. Put one on a flat surface, put a pin-hole in the other and hold it 12" above the other, "aiming" it at the sun. (Please, don't look at the corona during the eclipse, i have no reason to wish for you to go blind.) You will burn an image of the corona of the eclipsed star on the second sheet. You have absolutely no reason to claim that i deny the existence of light. Your inability to frame a coherent statement of how science operates is not evidence that i have made any such foolish contention.
Quote:When we cannot see something in science we measure the effects of it. We measure it's "possibilities".
This is another baseless contention. When we perform measurements, we are quatifying things in a manner subject to replication or falsification. We are not "measuring possibilities," we are quantifying realities.
Quote:Something was "created" in the big bang...
"The Big Bang" is a sneering term used by someone who did not believe in the theory of the cosmos deriving from a singularity. By the way, it was a Belgian priest who first articulated the concept.
Quote:"Revelation" is God speaking to us
This is another baseless contention. You have consistently failed to provide any reasonable evidence that a "god" exists. In that, you are exactly like "real life," who touts evidence, but provides none.
Quote:"Walking by the spirit" is God speaking to us
The word "spirit" itself comes from the word "inspiration" which is God "speaking" to us...
When God speaks it is not imagination but revelation and truth...
This is a string of illicit statements founded on an illicit premise. Your claim about the word spirit is total horsie poop. The word spirit derives from the Latin noun
spiritus, meaning breath, and derived from the verb
spirare, meaning to breathe. (I'm sure you'll take off on any number of idiotic tangents from that.) When the initial premise is false, all that follows from it is false. And your premises are inevitably false.
