spendius wrote:timber wrote-
Do you really believe the C squared. I've always taken it as shorthand for a very big number.
Is it actually literally true?
spendi, it is shorthand of a sort, but belief doesn't factor into it at all; its a demonstrated constant, it is at once literally and mathematically true. And its not really all that big a number, either - in meters-per-second, only 9 x 10^16. Well, actually, a little less; 8.9875517873681764 x 10^16 is a more exact figure, but even though its not a really big number, the 9 x 10^16 shorthand figure works well enough in most applications. Now, if you really wanna express it as a very big number, and very much more precisely, use the international standards of the oscilation period of the cesium atom as oppposed to seconds and the wavelength of krypton-86 as opposed to meters.