Im the other one
 
  1  
Reply Sun 23 Apr, 2006 10:30 am
Aww shucks, had one in my back yard. But I lost it.
0 Replies
 
timberlandko
 
  1  
Reply Sun 23 Apr, 2006 11:16 am
spendius wrote:
timber wrote-

Quote:
E=MC²


Do you really believe the C squared. I've always taken it as shorthand for a very big number.

Is it actually literally true?

spendi, it is shorthand of a sort, but belief doesn't factor into it at all; its a demonstrated constant, it is at once literally and mathematically true. And its not really all that big a number, either - in meters-per-second, only 9 x 10^16. Well, actually, a little less; 8.9875517873681764 x 10^16 is a more exact figure, but even though its not a really big number, the 9 x 10^16 shorthand figure works well enough in most applications. Now, if you really wanna express it as a very big number, and very much more precisely, use the international standards of the oscilation period of the cesium atom as oppposed to seconds and the wavelength of krypton-86 as opposed to meters.
0 Replies
 
rosborne979
 
  1  
Reply Sun 23 Apr, 2006 11:53 am
farmerman wrote:
Today, at Tokelau ( islands near Thailand) there is a native( but introduced) population of pigs , that have developed a low tide habit of swimming in the coral reefs to foage for seafood. The pigs
have become excellent swimmers and some degree of morphological changes have been noted in the population. There are examples of these adaptive mechanisms in a number of species. I wonder what the polar bear will become?


The pinipeds were probably arose from predators, just like the polar bears. But the Ursine branch has never had the need to be come aquatic (at least not yet). I bet they would make very formidible bear-whales over time Smile

However, the current polar bear population probably doesn't have much variation expressed in its gene pool, which makes it relatively unlikely that they would survive an environmental shift which pushes the existing form beyond survival capability.
0 Replies
 
rosborne979
 
  1  
Reply Sun 23 Apr, 2006 11:54 am
farmerman wrote:
Today, at Tokelau ( islands near Thailand) there is a native( but introduced) population of pigs , that have developed a low tide habit of swimming in the coral reefs to foage for seafood. The pigs
have become excellent swimmers and some degree of morphological changes have been noted in the population. There are examples of these adaptive mechanisms in a number of species. I wonder what the polar bear will become?


The pinipeds were probably arose from predators, just like the polar bears. But the Ursine branch has never had the need to be come aquatic (at least not yet). I bet they would make very formidible bear-whales over time Smile

However, the current polar bear population probably doesn't have much variation expressed in its gene pool, which makes it relatively unlikely that they would survive an environmental shift which pushes the existing form beyond survival capability.
0 Replies
 
rosborne979
 
  1  
Reply Sun 23 Apr, 2006 11:58 am
Sorry for the duplicate post. The system threw a different type of error at me and I didn't know it created the first post.
0 Replies
 
Lightwizard
 
  1  
Reply Sun 23 Apr, 2006 12:08 pm
You can immediately delete a second post if nobody else has posted. Or, even then, you can report the dup and a moderator will delete it.

With the North Pole ice cap melting, the polar bear could become extinct.
0 Replies
 
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Reply Sun 23 Apr, 2006 01:22 pm
It was also reported several months ago that the penguins south of New Zealand were in danger of extinction from the melting ice.
0 Replies
 
Lightwizard
 
  1  
Reply Sun 23 Apr, 2006 01:31 pm
That, too. But there's no global warming. Someone just left the freezer door ajar.
0 Replies
 
Chumly
 
  1  
Reply Sun 23 Apr, 2006 01:45 pm
I read that under certain circumstances, small isolated populations with little apparent variance, can morph relatively quickly (by evolutionary standards) because any beneficial mutation/adaptation is quickly optimized within the small group setting. Whereas in large group settings, such a beneficial mutation/adaptation may either get "absorbed" or take much longer to have a group net effect.

Also it suggested than if/when such accelerated evolution takes place, the chances of fossil records would be correspondingly low.

IOW although there is more risk to the survival of the species with a small group, the potential for accelerated evolution may at times be a saving grace.

I'm not implying we should gun down polar bears to help them adapt!
0 Replies
 
neologist
 
  1  
Reply Sun 23 Apr, 2006 05:14 pm
cicerone imposter wrote:
Man continues to search for the oldest human to prove our common ancestry from the apes. The big 64 million dollar question is, are there any fossils left to solve this question?
I thought you were the oldest human, CI.
0 Replies
 
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Reply Sun 23 Apr, 2006 05:17 pm
At 70, I'm an old geezer, but not the oldest.
0 Replies
 
xingu
 
  1  
Reply Sun 23 Apr, 2006 05:23 pm
Ya, your tied with Frank.
0 Replies
 
Chumly
 
  1  
Reply Sun 23 Apr, 2006 05:27 pm
Just when I get serious, the rest of you wieners go off!
0 Replies
 
xingu
 
  1  
Reply Sun 23 Apr, 2006 05:27 pm
Speaking of Frank, where has the old boy been lately?
0 Replies
 
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Reply Sun 23 Apr, 2006 05:34 pm
Playing golf.
0 Replies
 
xingu
 
  1  
Reply Sun 23 Apr, 2006 05:41 pm
Doesn't he know he has responsibilities are on this site.

Golf is like religion, it possesses you; it enslaves you. Listening to these poor possessed golf nuts talk is like listening to a Muslim talking about Muhammad.
0 Replies
 
Setanta
 
  1  
Reply Sun 23 Apr, 2006 05:46 pm
Read P. G. Wodehouse on golf sometime . . . hilarious . . .
0 Replies
 
neologist
 
  1  
Reply Sun 23 Apr, 2006 06:20 pm
Chumly wrote:
Just when I get serious, the rest of you wieners go off!
Well you were the one who wrote that you were not implying what you wrote - but wrote it anyhow. Smile

Calling CI and xingu and Set wieners! For shame!
0 Replies
 
Setanta
 
  1  
Reply Sun 23 Apr, 2006 06:22 pm
Yer an annoyin' little sh$t at times, ya know ?
0 Replies
 
neologist
 
  1  
Reply Sun 23 Apr, 2006 06:25 pm
Nyeah!
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

 
  1. Forums
  2. » Evolution? How?
  3. » Page 470
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.15 seconds on 11/18/2024 at 06:29:18