Arella Mae
 
  1  
Reply Wed 28 Sep, 2005 09:23 am
brahmin wrote:
so where's the evidence ?

What evidence are you asking for this time?
0 Replies
 
brahmin
 
  1  
Reply Wed 28 Sep, 2005 09:27 am
of existance. in any book aside of that one.
0 Replies
 
Frank Apisa
 
  1  
Reply Wed 28 Sep, 2005 09:31 am
Momma Angel wrote:
Rosborne979 Wrote:

Quote:
No. The question is how best to live with it.


So, since that sounds like religious freedom to me, are you saying it's okay for you to believe what you believe and I can believe what I believe and we neither have the right to demean the other or the other's beliefs?


I have attempted on many, many, many occasions to point out the problem with that suggestion, MA...but it just never seems to sink in.

Let me try it again...although I am going to substitute "take on things" for "beliefs" when talking about my postion.

Suppose my "take on things" is that the god someone else "believes" exists is a disgusting, jealous, vengeful, quick-to-anger slow-to-forgive, retributive, tyrannical, selfish, uncaring, brutish, murderous barbarian...and that adoring and worshipping this god is such a negative for society that it is my further "take on things" that every decent, caring, loving human being should be doing everything in his/her power to wipe the religion based on this god from the face of the Earth...

...how would I share of my "take on things" without demeaning anyone else's "beliefs?"
0 Replies
 
Arella Mae
 
  1  
Reply Wed 28 Sep, 2005 09:32 am
brahmin wrote:
of existance. in any book aside of that one.

If I understand that question (the way it is stated) correctly, there are plenty of books that have God in them. But, if you won't accept the Bible as evidence of God's existence, why would you accept it from any other book?

I am not saying that is your exact question. But, as you have it written and as I understand what you have written, that is my reponse.
0 Replies
 
Frank Apisa
 
  1  
Reply Wed 28 Sep, 2005 09:36 am
Let me make that even easier for you, MA.

Suppose the "beliefs" I encounter are those of an adherent of Adolph Hitler...and involve "believing" that Aryan males are superior to all other beings on the planet...and that all other beings must accept subordination to that belief.

Why should I afford any respect to that belief?
0 Replies
 
Arella Mae
 
  1  
Reply Wed 28 Sep, 2005 09:39 am
Frank Apisa Wrote:

Quote:
Suppose my "take on things" is that the god someone else "believes" exists is a disgusting, jealous, vengeful, quick-to-anger slow-to-forgive, retributive, tyrannical, selfish, uncaring, brutish, murderous barbarian...and that adoring and worshipping this god is such a negative for society that it is my further "take on things" that every decent, caring, loving human being should be doing everything in his/her power to wipe the religion based on this god from the face of the Earth...


That's religious freedom, Frank? How many times have we Christians been told that we force our religion down others throats? You would have it that Christians should stop spreading the word of 'what they have taken on' (in respect to you there) as a kind, loving, and forgiving God that if more people 'took Him on' that the world would be a better place. But, you should have the right to demean and belittle others for their beliefs?

So, since you think what 'you have taken on' is superior to what we 'have taken on?'
0 Replies
 
brahmin
 
  1  
Reply Wed 28 Sep, 2005 09:41 am
i asked for evidence to prove that Jesus existed. from any other book, but the bible...preferrably by any other contenporary culture.
0 Replies
 
brahmin
 
  1  
Reply Wed 28 Sep, 2005 09:44 am
Momma Angel wrote:
How many times have we Christians been told that we force our religion down others throats?


constantine, charlemange, templar knights, inquisitions, spaniards in SA, moteley missionary crews screwing other natives.... cant see how what they've been told is out of place....
0 Replies
 
Arella Mae
 
  1  
Reply Wed 28 Sep, 2005 10:01 am
brahmin wrote:
Momma Angel wrote:
How many times have we Christians been told that we force our religion down others throats?


constantine, charlemange, templar knights, inquisitions, spaniards in SA, moteley missionary crews screwing other natives.... cant see how what they've been told is out of place....

So, you want contemporary proof of Jesus' existence?

But, you only use non-contemporary evidence of Christians forcing our religion down your throats?

And again, I am sure you can find plenty of contemporary books that have Jesus in them. However, as I have told you before, if it's scientific proof you want, I can't give it to you.
0 Replies
 
thunder runner32
 
  1  
Reply Wed 28 Sep, 2005 10:05 am
What trancends science, cannot be proven by it.
0 Replies
 
Frank Apisa
 
  1  
Reply Wed 28 Sep, 2005 10:07 am
Momma Angel wrote:
Frank Apisa Wrote:

Quote:
Suppose my "take on things" is that the god someone else "believes" exists is a disgusting, jealous, vengeful, quick-to-anger slow-to-forgive, retributive, tyrannical, selfish, uncaring, brutish, murderous barbarian...and that adoring and worshipping this god is such a negative for society that it is my further "take on things" that every decent, caring, loving human being should be doing everything in his/her power to wipe the religion based on this god from the face of the Earth...


That's religious freedom, Frank? How many times have we Christians been told that we force our religion down others throats? You would have it that Christians should stop spreading the word of 'what they have taken on' (in respect to you there) as a kind, loving, and forgiving God that if more people 'took Him on' that the world would be a better place. But, you should have the right to demean and belittle others for their beliefs?

So, since you think what 'you have taken on' is superior to what we 'have taken on?'


That is not what I am saying, MA...and if you read what I actually wrote...you would see that.

You are demanding that I "respect" your "beliefs."

Are you respecting "my take on things?"

Are you??????
0 Replies
 
rosborne979
 
  1  
Reply Wed 28 Sep, 2005 10:07 am
Momma Angel wrote:
Rosborne979 Wrote:

Quote:
No. The question is how best to live with it.


So, since that sounds like religious freedom to me, are you saying it's okay for you to believe what you believe and I can believe what I believe and we neither have the right to demean the other or the other's beliefs?


Well, I believe in letting people believe whatever they want to believe as long as they don't pose a specific danger to society (the general argument of religion being a bad thing isn't strong enough for me to accept).

However, my point to Frank was just that the reality of the world is that religion is here with us and not likely to be gone any time in the near future. Certainly it will outlive those of us chatting today. So we should remain tolerant whenever possible and try to enjoy life with the mix of views.

Of course, none of that means that we can't try to convince each other of the validity of our own views Smile
0 Replies
 
Frank Apisa
 
  1  
Reply Wed 28 Sep, 2005 10:09 am
thunder_runner32 wrote:
What trancends science, cannot be proven by it.


Quite correct.

But something else that science cannot prove...is something that simply is not so.


Now all we have to do is determine whether science cannot prove that Zeus exists because Zeus "transcends science"...or because Zeus does not exist.

Got any ideas for how to do that?
0 Replies
 
neologist
 
  1  
Reply Wed 28 Sep, 2005 10:15 am
Are we there yet?
0 Replies
 
rosborne979
 
  1  
Reply Wed 28 Sep, 2005 10:22 am
thunder_runner32 wrote:
What trancends science, cannot be proven by it.


Of course. But neither can it be assumed.
0 Replies
 
Arella Mae
 
  1  
Reply Wed 28 Sep, 2005 10:26 am
thunder_runner32 Wrote:

Quote:
What trancends science, cannot be proven by it.


Amen!

Frank Apisa Wrote:

Quote:
Posted: Wed Sep 28, 2005 9:07 am Post subject:

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Momma Angel wrote:
Frank Apisa Wrote:

Quote:
Suppose my "take on things" is that the god someone else "believes" exists is a disgusting, jealous, vengeful, quick-to-anger slow-to-forgive, retributive, tyrannical, selfish, uncaring, brutish, murderous barbarian...and that adoring and worshipping this god is such a negative for society that it is my further "take on things" that every decent, caring, loving human being should be doing everything in his/her power to wipe the religion based on this god from the face of the Earth...



That's religious freedom, Frank? How many times have we Christians been told that we force our religion down others throats? You would have it that Christians should stop spreading the word of 'what they have taken on' (in respect to you there) as a kind, loving, and forgiving God that if more people 'took Him on' that the world would be a better place. But, you should have the right to demean and belittle others for their beliefs?

So, since you think what 'you have taken on' is superior to what we 'have taken on?'


That is not what I am saying, MA...and if you read what I actually wrote...you would see that.

You are demanding that I "respect" your "beliefs."

Are you respecting "my take on things?"

Are you??????


Frank, you and I have had plenty of run ins earlier on A2K. During those run ins, you called me some rather demeaning names because of what I believed. Wait - that is not the point yet. But, through further discussions, we came to an understanding and you have taken on a much kinder, gentler tone, that I appreciate more than you can imagine.

I am not demanding that you respect my beliefs, just my right to have them, which is what I feel you have been doing here of late.

Am I respecting your 'take on things'? I believe I am. I have put no negative connotations to your take of things.

But, this is my point, Frank. it seems that the non-believers think it is perfectly ok to put pretty strong negative connotations on the believers and their beliefs. And because you feel your take on things is the correct take, you (and you have stated it yourself) feel it is your duty to try to wipe our take on things from the face of the earth.

Now, what is the difference between you trying to wipe out our take on things and us discussing our take on things? I will admit there are believers who do try to force things down others' throats, but I am talking about in these threads.

I am not attempting to wipe out your take on things nor am I trying to wipe out anyone elses' take on things. I am sharing what I believe. Whether it is accepted by anyone is totally up to them. If they don't accept it then they don't accept it. It doesn't make them anything other than what they already are but with a little more information because of our discussions.
0 Replies
 
Arella Mae
 
  1  
Reply Wed 28 Sep, 2005 10:39 am
Rosborne979 Wrote:

Quote:
Well, I believe in letting people believe whatever they want to believe as long as they don't pose a specific danger to society (the general argument of religion being a bad thing isn't strong enough for me to accept).

However, my point to Frank was just that the reality of the world is that religion is here with us and not likely to be gone any time in the near future. Certainly it will outlive those of us chatting today. So we should remain tolerant whenever possible and try to enjoy life with the mix of views.

Of course, none of that means that we can't try to convince each other of the validity of our own views.Laughing


Ros,

I wanted to post to you individually so this didn't get lost. THIS (your post) (caps only for emphasis) is exactly what I believe religious freedom is about. Others sharing what they think, feel, and believe without having to resort to ANY (again caps for emphasis only) kind of negativity. I know it is very hard to discuss some things due to the so many conflicting views. But, it is up to each of us to curtail our anger (which I haven't done myself at times Embarrassed ) and not to use angry sounding words in the exchange.

It is a joy to be able to converse with someone such as you who has beliefs a bit different than mine but is willing to share those without the rancor. And for that, I thank you!
0 Replies
 
Intrepid
 
  1  
Reply Wed 28 Sep, 2005 10:39 am
If those that believe in God were trying to force it down non believers throats it would not be hard. Since 80% of the population believes in God, it would not be much of a shootout. Laughing

Seriously... There have been, and continue to be religious zealots that do not speak for the rest of us.

Most Christians, at least those that I know, do not want to force anything down anybody's throat. They do want to give them the opportunity to make their own choice. In the meantime, they make every effort to act in a civilized and Godly manner toward their fellow man. Those who are serious about their faith have no problem tolerating those things that they do not agree with; can forgive without reservation; are happy in their faith; are open to trying to understand different viewpoints.

Some, like me, believe in God and the creation but do not discount certain elements of evolution. Only a fool would completely discount everything out of blind conviction. I believe that the two can co-exist without bashing each other.
0 Replies
 
Frank Apisa
 
  1  
Reply Wed 28 Sep, 2005 10:43 am
Momma Angel wrote:
thunder_runner32 Wrote:

Quote:
What trancends science, cannot be proven by it.


Amen!


I hope you also say "Amen" to the fact that science also cannot "prove" something that isn't so.



Quote:


Frank Apisa Wrote:

Quote:
Posted: Wed Sep 28, 2005 9:07 am Post subject:

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Momma Angel wrote:
Frank Apisa Wrote:

Quote:
Suppose my "take on things" is that the god someone else "believes" exists is a disgusting, jealous, vengeful, quick-to-anger slow-to-forgive, retributive, tyrannical, selfish, uncaring, brutish, murderous barbarian...and that adoring and worshipping this god is such a negative for society that it is my further "take on things" that every decent, caring, loving human being should be doing everything in his/her power to wipe the religion based on this god from the face of the Earth...



That's religious freedom, Frank? How many times have we Christians been told that we force our religion down others throats? You would have it that Christians should stop spreading the word of 'what they have taken on' (in respect to you there) as a kind, loving, and forgiving God that if more people 'took Him on' that the world would be a better place. But, you should have the right to demean and belittle others for their beliefs?

So, since you think what 'you have taken on' is superior to what we 'have taken on?'


That is not what I am saying, MA...and if you read what I actually wrote...you would see that.

You are demanding that I "respect" your "beliefs."

Are you respecting "my take on things?"

Are you??????


Frank, you and I have had plenty of run ins earlier on A2K. During those run ins, you called me some rather demeaning names because of what I believed. Wait - that is not the point yet. But, through further discussions, we came to an understanding and you have taken on a much kinder, gentler tone, that I appreciate more than you can imagine.

I am not demanding that you respect my beliefs, just my right to have them, which is what I feel you have been doing here of late.

Am I respecting your 'take on things'? I believe I am. I have put no negative connotations to your take of things.

But, this is my point, Frank. it seems that the non-believers think it is perfectly ok to put pretty strong negative connotations on the believers and their beliefs. And because you feel your take on things is the correct take, you (and you have stated it yourself) feel it is your duty to try to wipe our take on things from the face of the earth.

Now, what is the difference between you trying to wipe out our take on things and us discussing our take on things? I will admit there are believers who do try to force things down others' throats, but I am talking about in these threads.

I am not attempting to wipe out your take on things nor am I trying to wipe out anyone elses' take on things. I am sharing what I believe. Whether it is accepted by anyone is totally up to them. If they don't accept it then they don't accept it. It doesn't make them anything other than what they already are but with a little more information because of our discussions.


But my point is, MA....that you are not respecting my "take on things" that religion should be wiped from the Earth.

And I don't expect you to do so.

My argument is not that you should respect my take...but rather that it is disingenuous to suppose any of us truly can respect other "beliefs."

In fact, in many cases...I would think a heck of a lot more of you for characterizing some "beliefs" as garbage...than if you "respected" them.

The Hitler adherent "belief" is a case in point. The "belief" that the proper way to to honor a god is to hijack an airplane and fly it into an occupied business building is another.
0 Replies
 
Arella Mae
 
  1  
Reply Wed 28 Sep, 2005 10:44 am
Intrepid wrote:
If those that believe in God were trying to force it down non believers throats it would not be hard. Since 80% of the population believes in God, it would not be much of a shootout. Laughing

Seriously... There have been, and continue to be religious zealots that do not speak for the rest of us.

Most Christians, at least those that I know, do not want to force anything down anybody's throat. They do want to give them the opportunity to make their own choice. In the meantime, they make every effort to act in a civilized and Godly manner toward their fellow man. Those who are serious about their faith have no problem tolerating those things that they do not agree with; can forgive without reservation; are happy in their faith; are open to trying to understand different viewpoints.

Some, like me, believe in God and the creation but do not discount certain elements of evolution. Only a fool would completely discount everything out of blind conviction. I believe that the two can co-exist without bashing each other.

Intrepid, I agree. I honestly don't know enough about evolution to discount it totally. I have never said that I do discount it totally. As a child, when it was first introduced into our school, I had a big problem with it, yes. I guess one question I have is this though, why would someone rather accept being evolved from a monkey (or anything else for that matter) than believe that they were created by a loving God?
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

 
  1. Forums
  2. » Evolution? How?
  3. » Page 187
Copyright © 2025 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.07 seconds on 07/12/2025 at 12:40:48