Thats an easy one. If the date is correct its a NAUTILID . They are of the phylum called mollusks, class is cephalopods , subclass is Nautiloidea (because there are a number of orders) and the order is Nautilida.
Are your friends certain about the age? if they are then Im including a paper with which you should look into the species descriptions of the MIOCENE PERIOD (faunal stage was called the Burdigalian (around 20. my before present).I cant getany closer on species without a very close observation and I would then compare it to a key description of Miocene nautilids, so youre on your own from there. Some background:
' There were about 5 nautiloidea families and a number of genera in this faunal stage and You need to just compare the suture marks (the little wavy lines along the coiled part of the shell-these are actually like growth rings) then look at the design of the aperture (which is the opening) If the opening is round, its no doubt and Aturia sp?.However , I cant be sure .
Now, if theyre not sure of the age, there was another , more geologically important subclassof cephalopods called AMMONOIDEA, which evolved from a nautilid rootstock back in the Paleozoic. The only difference is that the ammonoid siphuncle(the little jet tubes with which these critters shoot water and move like squids) are on the lateral sides while the nautilids' are on the dorsal side(There is a story that Hinkley got its idea for its Talaria line of jet cruiser boats from the ammonoid--This is probably all bullshit but I love to hear stories about applied paleo) . The ammonoids were all wiped out in the Cretaceous(probably something related to getting their siphuncles all clogged with crap because of the increased silt in the water)However, because theAmmonoids were more widespread we have a very good geologic age correlation using their variations in the sutures of their shells.
Nautiloids have only 2 living species and all livein the South Pacific. The really early nautiloids (Paleozoic forms) were really bizarre, with spines and all. Many paleos believe that these evolutionary trends that happened in a number of species including nautiloids ammonoids, and trilobites, were a defense mechanism to keep a seafood eating fish from creunching down on an animal that was armed like a pincushion. (If you want to see something really bizarre click in a species of trilobite called Terataspis grandii, who says we didnt have aliens on this planet?)
Heres the website, its a pdf so it takes a little longer to open
http://www.cephdev.utmb.edu/refdb/pdf/6960.pdf
I am trying to not type and post my stuff so quickly . I keep getting PMs laughing at my lack of spelling and language skills. This post has been edited for content and spelling. It is believed to be error free and , contains no virii or any of that crap. However, I have no control over highlighted sponsored links,(although I keep testing the boundaries by posting key words that let us know that some sponsored links may be somewhat naughty. So far I havent seen (CLEVELAND STEAMER) any such evidence .
Now, I must eat my breakfast of oat flakes and fruit . We are packing for the return home and its a melancholy day here at camp.