Progressives (Liberals)

Every book, author, topic a teacher selects and how they direct through Socratic method brings influence, Walter.
Surely you knew that.

What state are you in? Normally much of this is established by a mandated curriculum.

What state are you in?

G*d bless this country.

There's a difference and you're a better man than me for it.

Fox’s prime-time shows have covered the toppling of statue

it’s ridiculously cowardly to cry when it splashes up on you occasionally.

A network has to have a code to go by,

Trump is horrific because he does X—but Biden does X and you’re a traitor to mention it... How do you reconcile such a warped sense of honor?

CNN and the three networks use the Communist Manifesto.

The proletariat will use its political supremacy to wrest, by degree, all capital from the bourgeoisie, to centralise all instruments of production in the hands of the State, i.e., of the proletariat organised as the ruling class; and to increase the total productive forces as rapidly as possible.

The “dangerous class”, [lumpenproletariat] the social scum, that passively rotting mass thrown off by the lowest layers of the old society, may, here and there, be swept into the movement by a proletarian revolution; its conditions of life, however, prepare it far more for the part of a bribed tool of reactionary intrigue.

Hitherto, every form of society has been based, as we have already seen, on the antagonism of oppressing and oppressed classes. But in order to oppress a class, certain conditions must be assured to it under which it can, at least, continue its slavish existence. The serf, in the period of serfdom, raised himself to membership in the commune, just as the petty bourgeois, under the yoke of the feudal absolutism, managed to develop into a bourgeois. The modern labourer, on the contrary, instead of rising with the process of industry, sinks deeper and deeper below the conditions of existence of his own class. He becomes a pauper, and pauperism develops more rapidly than population and wealth. And here it becomes evident, that the bourgeoisie is unfit any longer to be the ruling class in society, and to impose its conditions of existence upon society as an over-riding law. It is unfit to rule because it is incompetent to assure an existence to its slave within his slavery, because it cannot help letting him sink into such a state, that it has to feed him, instead of being fed by him. Society can no longer live under this bourgeoisie, in other words, its existence is no longer compatible with society.

Says someone who doesn't know one thing about the Communist Manifesto.

Do yourself a favor, cj,

Now that load of viscous nasty crap is the real Lash we know and loathe. Of all the folks here its very hard to think of a more reasonable and open an friendly member than snood. He didn't write anything that deserved even the punctuation in your little ball of ****.