layman
 
  -3  
Reply Sun 12 Apr, 2020 01:53 pm
@Walter Hinteler,
Walter Hinteler wrote:

Quote:
Nazi political strategy focused on anti-big business, anti-bourgeois, and anti-capitalist rhetoric...


Thanks for the help in making the point, Walt.
Walter Hinteler
 
  3  
Reply Sun 12 Apr, 2020 01:57 pm
@layman,
If you quote me or what I quoted, then please do it correctly. And in the context of the wikipedia text.

That wikipedia report totally contradicts your "point".
But if you want to play the play the Nazis played - carry on
maporsche
 
  3  
Reply Sun 12 Apr, 2020 02:03 pm
@Walter Hinteler,
Ok, but the text is in quotation marks is it not? Those have a specific meaning I believe.
0 Replies
 
maporsche
 
  2  
Reply Sun 12 Apr, 2020 02:04 pm
@Walter Hinteler,
Walter Hinteler wrote:

If you quote me or what I quoted, then please do it correctly. And in the context of the wikipedia text.


I think Bernie Sanders deserves the same respect. That text was misquoted to Bernie Sanders...I wonder if he would say also taken out of context.
0 Replies
 
layman
 
  -2  
Reply Sun 12 Apr, 2020 02:07 pm
@Walter Hinteler,
Walter Hinteler wrote:
That wikipedia report totally contradicts your "point".


No it doesn't. What do you think the point is?
layman
 
  -3  
Reply Sun 12 Apr, 2020 02:39 pm
@layman,
layman wrote:


And, no doubt, at the point where you came to that mistaken conclusion, you refused to listen to another word he said.

Aint that right?


This is standard operating procedure for a cheese-eater. If they are reading or listening to some one who they believe will challenge their cherished beliefs, they will immediately find some putative "flaw" and declare that they will not read/listen to, another word of it, because the speaker is "obviously an idiot."
0 Replies
 
layman
 
  -3  
Reply Sun 12 Apr, 2020 02:58 pm
@layman,
layman wrote:

Walter Hinteler wrote:
That wikipedia report totally contradicts your "point".


No it doesn't. What do you think the point is?


I know, from extensive experience, Walt, that you seldom address any point made. Instead you immerse yourself in making totally irrelevant proclamations. You are the King of the non sequitur.

All I did was restate some points in the official, "inviolable" NAZI party platform. They are what are, whether you like them, argee with them, or not.

Wiki did not "contradict" any of this. On the contrary, it set forth those points. Criticizing those points (which wiki didn't really do either) does not "contradict" them or render them "untrue."

If you want to say that the "platform" which Hitler used to suck in supporters wasn't really adhered to later, so what? That doesn't change the official platform either.

Nor is it anything new. Every commie/socialist government does the same--it makes promises to gain power which it later ignores, as convenient. Hitler wanted to discriminate against jews. At least he limited it to one religion.

Commies, on the other hand, discriminate against EVERY religion. You can't even be a member of the communist party unless you denounce all religions and swear that your sole allegiance will be to the holy "state." Under Stalin, et al, all religions were openly discriminated against. There's certainly no difference between so-called "fascism" and commieism in that respect.

The element common to all of them is totalitarianism. They fully agree on that, too.
layman
 
  -3  
Reply Sun 12 Apr, 2020 03:24 pm
@layman,
Quote:
Hitler wanted to discriminate against jews. At least he limited it to one religion.


For the record, here are the platform points which mention jews, directly or indirectly:

Quote:
None but members of the nation may be citizens of the state. None but those of German blood, whatever their creed may be. No Jew, therefore, may be a member of the nation.

All immigration of non-Germans must be prevented. We demand that all non-Germans, who have immigrated to Germany since 2 August 1914, be required immediately to leave the Reich.

Whoever has no citizenship is to be able to live in Germany only as a guest and must be regarded as being subject to foreign laws.

We demand that the state be charged first with providing the opportunity for a livelihood and way of life for the citizens. If it is impossible to nourish the total population of the State, then the members of foreign nations (non-citizens) must be excluded from the Reich.

The right of voting on the state's government and legislation is to be enjoyed by the citizen of the state alone. We demand therefore that all official appointments, of whatever kind, shall be granted to citizens of the state alone.


This is the "nationalist" part of the name. None of it is exclusive to jews, and none of if advocates that non-citizens be exterminated, or anything of the kind.

So, the Nazi's were simply "national socialists," eh?
0 Replies
 
layman
 
  -3  
Reply Sun 12 Apr, 2020 04:55 pm
The "thinking" (if you're kind enough to call it that) of the cheese-eaters appears to be along these lines:

1. We love socialism
2. We hate Nazi's
3. Therefore the Nazi's cannot be socialists.

Notice that the premises do not entail the conclusion. ****, it's worse than that. The premises simply have no rational relationship to the conclusion. They are merely emotive sentiments, and the "conclusion" is not one of deduction at all. It is just a declaration of desire.

But that's par for the course with cheese-eaters, of course.
0 Replies
 
ehBeth
 
  2  
Reply Sun 12 Apr, 2020 07:23 pm
from an Abuzz/A2k friend from the early days
still limericking away



Two for the Senator from Vermont

April 9, 2020LoP

Bernie’s campaigning end meant
He can resume being independent.
Moral superiority
Don’t make supermajority
Needed for Constitutional amendment.

The ideals upon which he’d run,
Sander’s legacy merely begun.
To his followers vocal:
All politics are local.
Choose an office, take out papers, and run!
layman
 
  1  
Reply Sun 12 Apr, 2020 07:26 pm
@ehBeth,
Not bad.
0 Replies
 
layman
 
  -1  
Reply Sun 12 Apr, 2020 07:47 pm
Quote:
Democrats want yet another baseless investigation of Trump

House Democrats are readying another congressional committee, on the taxpayers' dime, to investigate the president and his response to the national crisis. You read that right.

Instead of working shoulder to shoulder with our commander in chief to save lives and resuscitate our economy, serial liar and conspiracy theorist Rep. Adam Schiff, D-Calif., and others on the left are plotting against the leader of the free world and members of Trump's administration tasked with responding to the complex crisis.

As if investigating the president nonstop for the past three-and-a-half years and subjecting the nation to an extremely divisive 22-month special counsel probe and subsequent impeachment scam – based on hearsay by partisan bureaucrats – weren't enough.

A new low – even for hateful Democrats still suffering from Trump Derangement Syndrome.


Obviously written by some Trump supporter, eh? One who happens to be right. Cheese-eaters are so self-destructive. They NEVER learn.
0 Replies
 
layman
 
  -1  
Reply Sun 12 Apr, 2020 08:03 pm
Quote:
California party that violated stay-at-home order and drew around 400 comes to 'bad end' with 6 shot

A huge party in California that defied the state's stay-at-home orders to combat coronavirus came to a "bad end" early Saturday with six people shot, authorities said.

Officials told KGET-TV that around 400 people are believed to have been at the party when the gunfire erupted.

Investigators found 94 spent bullet casings at the scene.

Partygoers reported seeing four black men drive away in a white car, according to police.

Officials told ABC23 that none of the victims are cooperating with authorities, and no arrests have been made.


Don't never, NEVER, I SAY, go to a private party with 400 pervs there. Once you have that many together there's always at least one who is packin and gets pissed off.
0 Replies
 
layman
 
  -2  
Reply Mon 13 Apr, 2020 10:47 am
Keep it up, there, eh, Jimbo?

Quote:
Ex CNN producer: Jim Acosta's Trump skirmishes 'make all in the press look bad'

CNN producer-turned media watchdog Steve Krakauer described his former colleague, CNN chief White House correspondent Jim Acosta, as a fame-seeking attention-getter who is “actively helping Trump get re-elected” while making the press look bad. Krakauer’s media newsletter, Fourth Watch, has gained popularity for holding the press accountable, and Sunday’s edition began with the detailed critique of Acosta.

“Jim Acosta loves nothing more than Jim Acosta,” Krakauer wrote. “I've also half-joked that if we found out, years from now, that Acosta was actually a plant and was secretly working for the Trump re-election campaign, I wouldn't be shocked.”

Acosta regularly shouts questions when it isn’t his turn to speak and famously struggled with a White House aide for possession of a microphone during a 2018 press conference, resulting in a legal skirmish over whether or not he would be able to cover the White House.

Krakauer explained that Acosta “plays the role of absurd, antagonistic journalist” during Trump’s press briefings, often teeing the president up to attack him and the media.

“Trump couldn't ask for a better foe than Jim Acosta. And the reporters who are trying to do good work, get answers to very real questions, know this,” Krakauer wrote.

“Acosta clearly aspires to use this opportunity to spar with President Trump, #Resistance Signal on Twitter and generally build his brand to move on to bigger things - a prime time show maybe, or at least a few late night TV appearances,” Krakauer wrote before pointing out the CNN reporter’s past Twitter profile background image that featured a picture of his appearance on “Jimmy Kimmel Live!”

“I don't think CNN White House correspondent Jim Acosta is a bad guy. I worked with him at CNN, and he was a solid, competent reporter. If Acosta's goal was to be a great White House reporter, he could probably do it,” Krakauer wrote. “But that's not Jim Acosta's goal. Jim Acosta wants to be famous.”


It aint good when your own homeys can see right through you, like everyone else does, eh?

0 Replies
 
layman
 
  -2  
Reply Mon 13 Apr, 2020 10:58 am
Quote:
"Billionaires should not exist," according to Sen. Bernie Sanders. "Every billionaire is a policy failure," says Dan Riffle, one of Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez's top advisers.

Private philanthropic efforts have delivered public health victories that governments have proved unwilling or unable to secure. The Gates Foundation spends more on public health each year than the World Health Organization. As a charter member of the vaccine alliance Gavi, the foundation has helped vaccinate over 700 million children and prevent more than 13 million deaths.

Its philanthropic investment in potential vaccines against COVID-19 – and the $100 million it has already pledged to improve testing and otherwise combat the outbreak – could save millions more lives.

Gates isn't alone in deploying his wealth to fight for medical progress. Former New York Mayor Michael Bloomberg has pledged $40 million to help fund global COVID-19 responses. His long track record of health care philanthropy includes a $300 million donation to the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, which has produced reams of research to inform the public response to the COVID-19 outbreak.

Jack Dorsey, the CEO of Twitter and Square, recently pledged $1 billion of his fortune to COVID-19 relief.


These billionaires shouldn't be giving a penny to help humanity, eh? In an ideal world, they wouldn't even have a penny.
0 Replies
 
layman
 
  -1  
Reply Mon 13 Apr, 2020 11:21 am
Leave us face it, eh? Black people are very backward and aint real bright. Just ask any liberal, if ya don't believe me.



0 Replies
 
Walter Hinteler
 
  6  
Reply Mon 13 Apr, 2020 12:23 pm
@maporsche,
Bernie Sanders Endorses Joe Biden for President
Quote:
The Vermont senator added the weight of his left-wing support to Mr. Biden’s candidacy in a step toward Democratic unity against President Trump.

Senator Bernie Sanders endorsed Joseph R. Biden Jr. as the Democratic nominee for president on Monday, adding the weight of his left-wing support to Mr. Biden’s candidacy and taking a major step toward bringing unity to the party’s effort to unseat President Trump in November.

In throwing his weight behind Mr. Biden, he is sending a striking and unmistakable signal that his supporters — who are known for their intense loyalty — should do so as well.

The two men appeared via live stream on split screens, talking to each other. “We need you in the White House,” Mr. Sanders said to Mr. Biden. “And I will do all that I can to make that happen.”

Mr. Biden said: “I’m going to need you. Not just to win the campaign, but to govern.”

Mr. Sanders hinted his intentions in a Twitter post shortly before appearing on a livestream.


https://i.imgur.com/OANbDvWl.jpg
blatham
 
  3  
Reply Mon 13 Apr, 2020 12:45 pm
@Walter Hinteler,
Yep.
coldjoint
 
  -3  
Reply Mon 13 Apr, 2020 12:50 pm
@blatham,
Quote:
Yep.

Sanders and Biden are 12 years late. They supported the most destructive president we ever had, Obama.
revelette3
 
  3  
Reply Mon 13 Apr, 2020 01:19 pm
@Walter Hinteler,
Two thumbs up for Bernie! He is absolutely showing way more support for Biden than he did for Hillary Clinton in 16'. Came close to telling his supporters to support Biden as well.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.18 seconds on 11/28/2024 at 06:37:46