oralloy
 
  -1  
Reply Mon 30 Mar, 2020 03:58 pm
@MontereyJack,
MontereyJack wrote:
rabel has your number,

No. Rabel is just falsely accusing everyone of his own dishonesty.


MontereyJack wrote:
not to get biblical, it's probably 666.

https://able2know.org/topic/465444-2#post-6666666
0 Replies
 
layman
 
  -3  
Reply Mon 30 Mar, 2020 04:17 pm
Quote:
Biden trails badly in enthusiasm: Poll

Former Vice President Joe Biden has emerged as Democrats’ top choice for the presidential nomination in a new ABC News/Washington Post poll, but with only bare majority support within his party and a massive enthusiasm gap in a November matchup against President Donald Trump.

Indeed, strong enthusiasm for Biden among his supporters – at just 24% – is the lowest on record for a Democratic presidential candidate in 20 years of ABC/Post polls. More than twice as many of Trump’s supporters are highly enthusiastic about supporting him, 53%.

Among Democrats and Democratic-leaning independents who prefer Vermont Sen. Bernie Sanders for the nomination, 15% say they’d back Trump over Biden in the fall.


https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/biden-consolidates-support-trails-badly-enthusiasm-poll/story?id=69812092

Leave us face it: Biden is toast. Among the Burnie Bros a significant percent say they'll actually vote for Trump. A lot of the rest will just stay home, and that includes non-Burnie supporters.
layman
 
  -1  
Reply Mon 30 Mar, 2020 04:23 pm
@layman,
I haven't seen anyone here praising Biden or his policies.

Their only "argument" is WE HATE TRUMP!
0 Replies
 
coldjoint
 
  -2  
Reply Mon 30 Mar, 2020 04:33 pm
@hightor,

Quote:
Like anyone cares what that buffoon says about his political opposition.

Like anyone cares what Trump's political opposition says, or the NYT and WP. They have all talked themselves out. Rehashing the same old crap while Trump does his job, and quite well at that.
0 Replies
 
layman
 
  -1  
Reply Mon 30 Mar, 2020 05:39 pm
Well, there goes that hope, cheese-eaters:

Quote:
Cuomo tamps down political buzz, says he won’t take ‘the bait’

"I am not going to get into a political dispute with the president. I’m not going to rise to the bait of a political challenge.

Cuomo added, “I’m not running for president. I was never running for president. I said from day one I wasn’t running for president. I’m not running for president now. I’m not playing politics.”


You're gunna hafta run Hillary again, eh?

Good luck with that.

Then again, there's always Cuomo's brother, Fredo.
0 Replies
 
georgeob1
 
  -2  
Reply Mon 30 Mar, 2020 09:12 pm
@blatham,
blatham wrote:

Quote:
In that situation I would be very pissed off as well.
So he was sincerely pissed off.

Your continued support for Trump is morally despicable.


" Morally despicable" Laughing Laughing Laughing

Just what is the foundation for that mortality? So far it appears to be something very flexible that accommodates your prejudice of the moment.

I made no judgment of Kavanaugh's motives or thoughts. Instead I considered the evidence presented; a collection of accompanying contrary facts that emerged during the course of the hearings; and the prior and contemporary behaviors of the Democrat Senators behind the "surprise" emergence of the issue, and decided the accusations were false and that it was simply a desperate act by partisan Democrats to defend what had been their Supreme court citadel.

Equivalent or worse accusations have emerged about ole Joe Biden, though they are not quite as far back in the past as those raised about Judge Kavanaugh. They have gone largely unreported in the MSM, but I suspect you are aware of them. Are you also "morally" outraged about them?
0 Replies
 
blatham
 
  2  
Reply Mon 30 Mar, 2020 10:54 pm
Quote:
andrew kaczynskiThinking face
@KFILE
40m
Two weeks ago Devin Nunes was urging people to go to bars and restaurants while the CDC was urging people to stay home. He later lied and claimed he told people to get takeout.

Indeed, he did lie. Here's what he said on Fox
Quote:
“If you’re healthy, you and your family, it’s a great time to go out and go to a local restaurant, likely you can get in easy. Let’s not hurt the working people in this country...go to your local pub”

Such a surprise.
0 Replies
 
McGentrix
 
  -1  
Reply Mon 30 Mar, 2020 11:06 pm
@blatham,
blatham wrote:

Quote:
Cenk Uygur
@cenkuygur
A lot of progressives in this article are very nice but my job is to keep it real.
@AOC
decision to work with establishment rather than challenge it is very disappointing: AOC breaks with Bernie on how to lead the left https://politico.com/news/2020/03/30/new-aoc-divides-the-left-150767 via
@politico

Such a dummy, this guy. It's interesting and predictable to see how the term "establishment" is now a thought-terminating-cliche for his sort.


Holy **** balls! Have we found common ground AGAIN?!

Cenk Uygur is a **** stain on the sidewalk of media personalities.
blatham
 
  3  
Reply Mon 30 Mar, 2020 11:17 pm
There's so much wrong with this sick man
Quote:
To evade a reporter's question on the United States' coronavirus testing capabilities, President Donald Trump tried to flex with a fun fact.

"I know South Korea better than anybody," Trump said when responding to the question from PBS NewsHour's Yamiche Alcindor. "It's a very tight — do you know how many people are in Seoul? Do you know how big the city of Seoul is? 38 million people. That's bigger than anything we have."

Seoul-proper — officially known as the Seoul Special City — has a population of around 10 million, according to the city government's English language website.
The greater metropolitan area clocks in at around 25 million, still far from Trump's estimate of 38 million — which is actually around the estimated population of the Greater Tokyo Area.
link
coldjoint
 
  -1  
Reply Mon 30 Mar, 2020 11:19 pm
@blatham,
Quote:
The greater metropolitan area clocks in at around 25 million, still far from Trump's estimate of 38 million — which is actually around the estimated population of the Greater Tokyo Area.

More grounds for impeachment. Does Adam Schiff know about this?
0 Replies
 
blatham
 
  2  
Reply Mon 30 Mar, 2020 11:19 pm
@McGentrix,
Quote:
Cenk Uygur is a **** stain on the sidewalk of media personalities.
I wish he had the knowledge background and intelligence of Diamond and Silk.
0 Replies
 
layman
 
  -1  
Reply Mon 30 Mar, 2020 11:44 pm
Jimmy Acosta with his usual grandstanding eh?

Quote:
Acosta made a big splash in the Rose Garden when he attempted to grill the president for his rhetoric on the virus outbreak in the weeks leading up to the national crisis.

"What do you say to Americans who are upset with you over the way you downplayed this crisis?" Acosta added, "What do you say to Americans who believe that you got this wrong?"

"If you look at those individual statements, they're all true. Stay calm, it will go away -- you know that it is going away, and... we're going to have a great victory. And, it's people like you and CNN that say things like that -- it's why people just don't want to listen to CNN anymore. You could ask a normal question."

I can cause panic much better than even you. I would make you look like a minor-league player, but you know what? I don't want to do that. I want to have our country be calm and strong and fight and win, and it will go away."

"And, instead of asking a nasty, snarky question like that, you should ask a real question," Trump scolded the reporter before moving on to other questions.


Poor Jimbo. Trump never gives him the last word, ya know? It just aint no fair, I tells ya!
layman
 
  -1  
Reply Mon 30 Mar, 2020 11:58 pm
@layman,
Can you imagine a gang of wise-ass reporters doing their best to demoralize the country and spread doom and gloom during WWII?

Trying to point out every little flaw they could find every time Truman, Ike, Patton, et al approved or implemented a plan that didn't go off perfectly? Playing monday morning quarterback and trying to pretend that if only THEY were in charge, the war would have been won already? Trying to humiliate our generals?

There might have been some, I don't know. If so, they weren't around long. I figure they were summarily executed.
0 Replies
 
Olivier5
 
  0  
Reply Tue 31 Mar, 2020 12:12 am
Cogent piece in the New Yorker about what Covid-19 means for the US.

Reality Has Endorsed Bernie Sanders
By Keeanga-Yamahtta Taylor, March 30, 2020

https://www.newyorker.com/news/our-columnists/reality-has-endorsed-bernie-sanders/amp
0 Replies
 
layman
 
  1  
Reply Tue 31 Mar, 2020 07:40 am

Now this story is worth reading, sho nuff:

Quote:
Celebrities who have tested positive for coronavirus


NOT
0 Replies
 
revelette3
 
  2  
Reply Tue 31 Mar, 2020 08:20 am
The benefit of the Democrats denouncing Sanders’s selfishness

Quote:
The problem, according to many Democrats, remains that 15 percent of Sanders supporters say in polling that they would vote for President Trump over Biden. This nugget actually makes the opposite argument: There is nothing that would satisfy some faction of the Sanders coalition that would rather blow up our democracy and reelect Trump. With people so irrational, the best response is to ignore them. They, like the MAGA-hat crowd, are unreachable and cannot be bargained with (e.g., more New Green Deal talk!). So do not try. No more outreach to Sanders, no more promised policy modifications, no more speaking slot at the convention. Enough.

This would have some salutary effects.

First, it would make perfectly clear that Biden is not Sanders andnot a crazy left-winger, as Trump would like to paint him in the campaign. Biden makes a sharp distinction between the “democratic socialist” crowd and his own brand of center-left politics. Since he cannot get the 15 percent of “Bernie or Bust” Democrats (or independents), he might as well make a strong play for moderate independents and disaffected Republicans. Cutting Sanders off effectively allows Biden to pitch to gettable swing voters, not waste time on unattainable Bernie Bros.

Second, freezing out Sanders will make governance in a Biden administration much easier and more cohesive. There will be no debt to be paid to Sanders, no advisers taken on to satisfy Sanders, and no weird and distracting policy initiatives to lead the new administration astray. This would be a center-left administration confident of its own governing agenda — and personally cohesive.

Third, it would free up constructive, smart progressive leaders such as Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.) to lead that wing of the party. She has already begun that process, contributing bankruptcy and student loan forgiveness plans to the Biden campaign. With a practical, crafty progressive in the Senate (hopefully in the majority and able to lead on legislation), Biden would be able to broaden his appeal and cultivate allies in the Warren wing of the party.

In other words, shoving Sanders offstage opens up room for party builders and party reformers, putting aside unattainable proposals (e.g., Medicare-for-all) in favor of a smarter, more broadly acceptable agenda. (Biden would not need to fend off a Warren primary challenge, as Barack Obama did with Sanders in 2012.)

In sum, it is not worthwhile to court Sanders or his rabid allies. Indeed, it is far better to ignore them, clearly position Biden in the center-left, be free to construct a sensible and cohesive administration, and help clear the decks for a new group of responsible progressives.
layman
 
  1  
Reply Tue 31 Mar, 2020 08:24 am
@revelette3,
Leave us face it. Biden is toast, no matter what he does.
0 Replies
 
layman
 
  1  
Reply Tue 31 Mar, 2020 08:26 am
@revelette3,
You can bet your ass that a recurring theme in Trump's campaign will be how the corrupt democrats conspired to squeeze out Burnie.

He's got 15%, he's shooting for 40-50%.
Brand X
 
  2  
Reply Tue 31 Mar, 2020 08:32 am
Biden has started a new podcast series, this is what campaigning has come to. I know we are all on the edge of our seats waiting to tune into these. When Joe did his live video stream a coupe weeks ago it had 2800 concurrent viewers.

https://joebiden.com/Heres-The-Deal/

0 Replies
 
revelette3
 
  3  
Reply Tue 31 Mar, 2020 08:43 am
I've been thinking about who Biden might pick to be his running mate, I've come down to Warren. I know she is old too, but she seems to have plenty of energy to spare and she would cover Biden's weak side of progressives who are not die-hard Bernie bros.
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.11 seconds on 05/05/2024 at 03:31:55