Progressives (Liberals)

Why is it ONLY SANDERS you’re ‘concerned’ about?

That's exactly my point over many posts. Lash is using Sanders as a smoke screen for her relentless attacks on the Democratic Party, just as she used him as a smoke screen for attacking Clinton in 2016. She has consistently attacked the Clintons for sixteen years at this site. Supporting Sanders was just another opportunity. In your monitoring thread she once wrote that Plump is her president, and the Republicans are her party. When I later pointed that out, she first admitted it, then demanded that I prove it. (She must have been hitting the sauce that night.) I'm sure she thinks she's clever--whether or not she does, like the Russians from the troll farm that we get here, she's come to realize that she need only hammer a particular point, and deceive the unwary. She has gotten a lot of undeserved sympathy, too. Lately, Nimh went after me for my remarks to her. I had pointed out that she had referred to the Democrats as "your party" when addressing someone else. Nimh said that my criticixm of her for that was a non sequitur. He's one of the sharper knives in the drawer, but
without the greater context, he doesn't see the pattern.

Lash's posts are toxic content, and it's not always recognized.

My enemy is political corruption—the chips fall on both parties.

NRATV host: Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez “ought to go back and get a job at IKEA instead of Congress”
Grant Stinchfield: “Make furniture there instead of make laws in Washington, we’d all be better off”

I doubt that he really has anything to hide; if he's just reticent or embarrassed because he's got a substantial amount of wealth, he shouldn't be, as long as it was all come by legally. It gets hard to attack Trump for being secretive if our candidates behave the same way.

When even the NRA jumps on the right wing project to slime Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, that just provides further evidence they are very frightened of what this lady might do and be up the road.

Quote:

NRATV host: Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez “ought to go back and get a job at IKEA instead of Congress”
Grant Stinchfield: “Make furniture there instead of make laws in Washington, we’d all be better off”

MM

Some part of this strategy is likely to be a predictable attack implying "Dems = Socialism!" They'll use this as the election approaches,
particularly if Sanders is the nominee, in an attempt to dredge up old fears inculcated in the right wing mind. But it is AOC far more than anyone else who is now drawing attacks from the right.

Laura Ingraham says Martin Luther King Jr. would disagree with Democrats protesting Trump

Quote:

I doubt that he really has anything to hide; if he's just reticent or embarrassed because he's got a substantial amount of wealth, he shouldn't be, as long as it was all come by legally. It gets hard to attack Trump for being secretive if our candidates behave the same way.

Precisely. I'd be extremely surprised if he's hiding something here (other than perhaps the wealth held by he and wife) but he's got to get this done and the longer he delays the worse it looks.

Imagine if even two or three just like her get into the congress.

His enemies will go through the returns and magnify every little non socialist spec they can find.

Netanyahu Vows to Annex West Bank, Never Allow Palestinian State, If Reelected

The people here who seem to think any Democrat will do, so long as it removes Trump, are playing into their hands.

Setanta wrote:

That's exactly my point over many posts. Lash is using Sanders as a smoke screen for her relentless attacks on the Democratic Party, just as she used him as a smoke screen for attacking Clinton in 2016. She has consistently attacked the Clintons for sixteen years at this site. Supporting Sanders was just another opportunity. In your monitoring thread she once wrote that Plump is her president, and the Republicans are her party. When I later pointed that out, she first admitted it, then demanded that I prove it. (She must have been hitting the sauce that night.) I'm sure she thinks she's clever--whether or not she does, like the Russians from the troll farm that we get here, she's come to realize that she need only hammer a particular point, and deceive the unwary. She has gotten a lot of undeserved sympathy, too. Lately, Nimh went
after me for my remarks to her. I had pointed out that she had referred to the Democrats as "your party" when addressing someone else. Nimh said that my criticixm of her for that was a non sequitur. He's one of the sharper knives in the drawer, but
without the greater context, he doesn't see the pattern.

Lash's posts are toxic content, and it's not always recognized.

Excessive personal attack across several threads and several years, including mention of drinking to explain a rank lie he continues to tell about me.

If this isn’t considered against the rules, I will wallpaper this place with the same. I am tired of the one-sided treatment here. Either apply the rules to him, or expect me to return in kind.

The people here who seem to think any Democrat will do, so long as it removes Trump, are playing into their hands.