blatham
 
  3  
Reply Tue 12 Mar, 2019 02:08 pm
We were talking about people who cannot learn or are seriously impeded in learning because..."I don't have to read anything or listen to anyone. I already know all about it". Two tweets from Trump this morning:
Quote:
“Airplanes are becoming far too complex to fly. Pilots are no longer needed, but rather computer scientists from MIT. I see it all the time in many products. Always seeking to go one unnecessary step further, when often old and simpler is far better.

“Split second decisions are needed, and the complexity creates danger. All of this for great cost yet very little gain. I don’t know about you, but I don’t want Albert Einstein to be my pilot. I want great flying professionals that are allowed to easily and quickly take control of a plane!”
Benen
0 Replies
 
blatham
 
  3  
Reply Tue 12 Mar, 2019 02:14 pm
Quote:
Trump's approach to the climate crisis gets even more embarrassing

The National Climate Assessment, reflecting the combined judgment of 13 federal agencies, from NASA to the Pentagon, was originally scheduled to be released late last year. The Trump administration, however, decided to move up the release date to Nov. 23 -- the day after Thanksgiving -- to help ensure the smallest possible audience for the information.

That's probably because the report was quite terrifying, warning of dramatic environmental, economic, and national security consequences resulting from an intensifying climate crisis. Asked for his reactions to the document, Donald Trump briefly pretended he'd "read some of it," before adding, "I don't believe it."

And who, pray tell, does the president believe? Some guy he saw on Fox News this morning. Trump published this tweet a few hours ago:

Quote:
"Patrick Moore, co-founder of Greenpeace: 'The whole climate crisis is not only Fake News, it's Fake Science. There is no climate crisis, there's weather and climate all around the world, and in fact carbon dioxide is the main building block of all life.' @foxandfriends Wow!"


As is too often the case, Trump has no idea what he's talking about. As Greenpeace USA explained soon after, "Patrick Moore was not a co-founder of Greenpeace. He does not represent Greenpeace. He is a paid lobbyist, not an independent source."

The environmental organization added on its website that Moore has been a "paid spokesman for a variety of polluting industries for more than 30 years."

Moore also happens to be an adviser to the Heartland Institute, a conservative advocacy organization that rejects the mainstream scientific consensus on the climate crisis...
Benen

These people cannot be allowed to remain in power.
oralloy
 
  -4  
Reply Tue 12 Mar, 2019 02:23 pm
@glitterbag,
glitterbag wrote:
Is Spartacus a nick name cooked up by our urban, sofisticated, man of the world Trump?

No. It's a reference to Booker's goofy "I am Spartacus" rant during the Kavanaugh confirmation hearings.
0 Replies
 
oralloy
 
  -4  
Reply Tue 12 Mar, 2019 02:29 pm
@MontereyJack,
MontereyJack wrote:
Look to POTUS for a textbook case not libs..

No. Name-calling and callousness?

I'm looking at you.
0 Replies
 
coldjoint
 
  -3  
Reply Tue 12 Mar, 2019 02:44 pm
@blatham,
Quote:

These people cannot be allowed to remain in power.

Was your chest puffed up when you typed that? Laughing Laughing Laughing Drama queens.
0 Replies
 
RABEL222
 
  2  
Reply Tue 12 Mar, 2019 02:51 pm
@blatham,
I on the other hand am a flawed Catholic. But it conforms to my flawed character.
blatham
 
  1  
Reply Tue 12 Mar, 2019 03:02 pm
@RABEL222,
Quote:
I on the other hand am a flawed Catholic. But it conforms to my flawed character.
I'll say.
0 Replies
 
blatham
 
  1  
Reply Tue 12 Mar, 2019 04:24 pm
Jane Mayer talks with NYer editor on the relationship between Fox and the WH (24 min) http://bit.ly/2VX3hBM

Worth your time.
coldjoint
 
  -3  
Reply Tue 12 Mar, 2019 05:10 pm
@blatham,
Quote:
Jane Mayer

Is a shill.
0 Replies
 
Lash
 
  0  
Reply Tue 12 Mar, 2019 05:43 pm
@Olivier5,
I hate both of them and I want those millions back that they gave Mueller to find a reason to impeach him.
snood
 
  5  
Reply Tue 12 Mar, 2019 06:09 pm
Anybody here want to hazard a guess about why people like David Duke, Steve Bannon and Uber-conservative Congressman Matt Gaetz have all publicly praised Tulsi Gabbard?
coldjoint
 
  -4  
Reply Tue 12 Mar, 2019 06:13 pm
@snood,
Quote:
like David Duke, Steve Bannon and Uber-conservative Congressman Matt Gaetz

Bannon and Gaetz do not belong with Duke. Some new congresswomen do.
0 Replies
 
blatham
 
  2  
Reply Tue 12 Mar, 2019 08:35 pm
@Lash,
Quote:
Lash wrote:
Notice Pelosi rejecting impeachment?
If she believed the Russia/Trump collusion narrative we’ve paid half a billion dollars to follow up, would she let him walk?

Olivier5 wrote @Lash,
Your hated democratic majority leader doesn't want to impeach your beloved president, and yet you can still find a reason to bitch about it?

Lash wrote:
@Olivier5,
I hate both of them and I want those millions back that they gave Mueller to find a reason to impeach him.

I am having a fair bit of trouble figuring out what you are trying to say.
"Both of them" refers to whom? Pelosi and Trump is how it reads.
"millions they gave Mueller" Who is "they"?

The sequence was (from wikipedia)
Quote:
A January 2017 assessment by the US Office of the Director of National Intelligence claimed that Russian leadership favored presidential candidate Donald Trump over Hillary Clinton, adding that Russian president Vladimir Putin personally ordered an "influence campaign" to harm Clinton's electoral chances and "undermine public faith in the US democratic process."[32] It is alleged that the Russian government interfered in the 2016 U.S. presidential election by bolstering the candidacies of Trump, Bernie Sanders and Jill Stein,[33][34] in order to increase political instability in the United States as well as to damage the Clinton presidential campaign.

Then Trump's Justice Department was responsible for investigating. Sessions recused himself. That automatically put Rosenstein (a Trump appointee) in charge. He appointed Mueller. Are you suggesting that the JD, Sessions, Rosenstein, Mueller and the National Intelligence Service were or are out to get Trump impeached?

blatham
 
  1  
Reply Tue 12 Mar, 2019 08:36 pm
@snood,
I don't know. I haven't studied Gabbard at all so I'm no help to you.
0 Replies
 
glitterbag
 
  1  
Reply Tue 12 Mar, 2019 08:45 pm
@blatham,
tsk tsk Bernie, you're asking her to unscramble an egg. Can't be done, trust me I've tried it.
0 Replies
 
coldjoint
 
  -3  
Reply Tue 12 Mar, 2019 10:22 pm
@blatham,
Quote:
Are you suggesting that the JD, Sessions, Rosenstein, Mueller and the National Intelligence Service were or are out to get Trump impeached?

Why not? Every other high ranking intelligence figure from the Obama administration was. Mr Spam won't answer because it has failed. Like he has, spreading dis information. Whoever is held accountable will not change the result, they failed.
0 Replies
 
hightor
 
  4  
Reply Wed 13 Mar, 2019 02:33 am
The idea that the proper conclusion of the Mueller report can only be charges directly leading to impeachment — or the whole process was just a waste of money — is incomprehensible to me. It just feeds into the whole stupid "witch hunt" meme and ends up helping Trump to make his pathetic "they're out to get me" case. Exactly the kind of thing that warms Putin's heart.
Olivier5
 
  4  
Reply Wed 13 Mar, 2019 03:31 am
@Lash,
Who in his/her right mind gives a flying rat's ass about a few million $ when what's at stake is the fate of the American democracy?

You're so petty here. Try and look at the big picture from time to time. It's not about individuals. Even Trump is but a manifestation of systemic flaws in the US political system, i.e. the premium given to filthy rich people in any election, the farewell to truth, the intense polarization, etc.
Olivier5
 
  1  
Reply Wed 13 Mar, 2019 04:08 am
@revelette1,
What do you mean by "fundamental (flawed) Christian"?

(I can understand the flawed part - who isn't? - but you don't seem to fit my view of a fundamentalist)
blatham
 
  5  
Reply Wed 13 Mar, 2019 05:56 am
So much winning.
Quote:
Trump vowed to eliminate the debt in 8 years. He’s on track to leave it at least 50 percent higher.
WP

And who in the GOP/conservative universe has the integrity to even talk about this? Is there anyone?
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 1.35 seconds on 11/19/2024 at 10:28:31