1
   

Jeff Gannon, Jim Guckert, and... Prostitution?

 
 
parados
 
  1  
Reply Fri 18 Feb, 2005 11:04 pm
I read somewhere early on in this scandal that the WH press core is not allowed to use aliases unless it is a maiden name. I have not been able to confirm this anywhere but if true it does raise another question about the WH honesty on this issue.
0 Replies
 
JustWonders
 
  1  
Reply Fri 18 Feb, 2005 11:52 pm
He gave the White House his real name.
0 Replies
 
Dookiestix
 
  1  
Reply Sat 19 Feb, 2005 01:05 am
Anybody notice what the Freepers have been up to these days?:

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1345967/posts

This is another glaring tactic brought upon by the neoconservative rightwing nutjobs to deflect by attempting to convert the cause into something much bigger than it really is (i.e., the 1st Amendment).

Gannon failed to answer many questions asked by Mr. Cooper. His take on journalism is so beyond naive, as he justifies his actions for the cause of spreading conservatism throughout the country via fake news and propoganda.

The rightwing back slapping euphoria in the mainstream media is readily apparent; the "hot talk" radio stations across the heartland (and even here in San Francisco), are more vitriolic than ever. The absurdity continuously reaches new heights. They are spinning this Gannon story completely out of control. They KNOW this is bigger than what it appears on the surface. Why ELSE would they pay attention to this, as the Freepers are currently doing?

Because it's virtually impossible to defend the indefensible. Although, I'm sure Karl Rove will figure out a way to get around it...

Ann Coulter is an utter fool, and yet she appears on these rightwing talk shows almost daily.
0 Replies
 
PDiddie
 
  1  
Reply Sat 19 Feb, 2005 04:50 am
The Rove/Gannon connection:

Quote:
...So when Jeff Gannon, White House "reporter" for Talon "News," was unmasked last week, the leap to a possible Rove connection was unavoidable. Gannon says that he met Rove only once, at a White House Christmas party, and Gannon is kind of small potatoes for Rove at this point in his career.

But Rove's dominance of White House and Republican politics, Gannon's aggressively partisan work and the ease with which he got day passes for the White House press room the past two years make it hard to believe that he wasn't at least implicitly sanctioned by the "boy genius." Rove, who rarely gave on-the-record interviews to the MSM (mainstream media), had time to talk to GOPUSA, which owns Talon.

GOPUSA and Talon are both owned by Bobby Eberle, a Texas Republican and business associate of conservative direct-mail guru Bruce Eberle who says that Bobby is from the "Texas branch of the Eberle clan." Bobby Eberle told The New York Times that he created Talon to build a news service with a conservative slant and "if someone were to see 'GOPUSA,' there's an instant built-in bias there." No kidding.


More on Bobby Eberle in a moment...

Quote:
...But what Gannon was up to was not just writing opinion columns or using a different technique to get information. He was a player in Republican campaigns and his work in the South Dakota Senate race illustrates the role he played. It is also a classic example of how political operatives are using the brave new world of the Internet and the blogosphere. Gannon and Talon News appear to be mini-Drudge reports; a "news" source which partisans use to put out negative information, get the attention of the bloggers, talk radio and then the MSM in a way that mere press releases are unable to achieve.


The synergy of blogs-to-radio-to Newsmax/Townhall/WorldNetDaily-to Washington Times-to Fox "News"- to, finally, the "MS"M is the effect they are going for. And having. (Drudge used to serve this purpose, but his time is over.)

It's the corporate media collectively that are responsible for this further disintegration of their profession. By again failing to do their job: calling the government -- regardless of party in power -- on its lies and BS. When someone like Jeff Gannon (it's not relevant as to whether "Bulldog" was topping someone in the White House -- salacious, but not relevant) prints WH press releases, calls it 'news' and then defends it by saying it is free of the 'liberal filter', it's not just the poor deluded red-staters who have lost; it's the media as franchise.

They have been bypassed. Marginalized. Rendered irrelevant by failing to challenge those who would pretend they are as qualified, credentialed, trained, edited, etc.

Sidebar over. Back to Rove and Gannon:

Quote:
Planting or even just sanctioning a political operative in the WH press room is a dangerous precedent and Karl Rove's hope to become a respected policymaker will be hampered if the dirty tricks from his political past are more apparent than his desire to spread liberty around the globe.


No way Rove lets someone just slip into the White House press room for two years. He was in the press room before Talon News even existed, which means he was there without any media credential whatsoever. This at a time when the WH was stalling Maureen Dowd for a pass. Rove also gave Gannon/Guckert an interview (something he rarely does with any medium).

The only really surprising thing about Jimmy/Jeff's "secret" life as a gay prostitute is why that did not disqualify him for this plum role as media creation.

Couldn't they have found someone a little squeaky-cleaner?
0 Replies
 
Joe Nation
 
  1  
Reply Sat 19 Feb, 2005 05:22 am
I don't think they checked him out. The way it works is somebody calls somebody and says they've got somebody to do a job. A job appears.
Eberle called Rove or viceversa and it was a done deal. Fleischer's discomfort with calling on the guy after he, Fleischer, found out about the GOPUSA connection makes me like Ari a little more than I did, and he had to do what his boss told him to do, keep calling on the schill.

The White House should announce that it is not the policy of the Bush Administration to feed information through political operatives assuming the role of journalist, but they won't, who knows who else would have to leave?

Joe( Thank you, let me ask you that question you handed me in the hallway.) Nation\\

Oh and PS: GREAT POST PD!!
0 Replies
 
PDiddie
 
  1  
Reply Sat 19 Feb, 2005 05:26 am
Thanks, Joe. Just tryin' to keep up with you.

Here's a good bit about my neighbor to the south (about twenty minutes):

Quote:
http://images.chron.com/content/news/photos/05/02/18/eberle.jpg

Eberle is the owner, president and CEO of two Web sites, the openly partisan GOPUSA (gopusa.com) and what he says is a nonpartisan news organization, Talon News (talonnews.com).


<snip>

Quote:
Eberle's older brother, Bruce, runs a conservative Web site, Millions of Americans (millionsofamericans.com). The two sites joined forces in 2004, and Bruce Eberle started referring his readers to Bobby Eberle's site....

Public records show that Eberle has never donated to a political campaign, and the Texas Ethics Commission reports only one time that Eberle gave or received money from the GOP. He was paid $165 last year for travel expenses to deep East Texas to speak to the Smith County Republicans.

Several local Republican elected officials did not return phone calls regarding Eberle.

"I'm not going to comment because I don't know him, and nobody here does," said Sherry Sylvester, a spokeswoman for the Republican Party of Texas, when asked about Eberle.


Is Talon News 'real media', or are they as legitimate as Gannon/Guckert?

Quote:
Kelly McBride, an ethics expert at the Poynter Institute, a journalism school, said the criteria for legitimate news organizations must include attempts to avoid conflicts of interest and biased reporting. Ideological and opinion journalism could still meet this criteria, she said, but only if they are upfront about their stances.

Talon News, she said, is "using a journalism format, but they're not employing the practices of journalism."

Eberle claims that, although GOPUSA is clearly partisan, Talon offers unbiased news "without the liberal filter" that he believes mainstream media contain. The two sites, though, are inextricably linked. Talon News contains only blurbs of stories. Users who want to read more are directed to GOPUSA.

"Talon News is not designed to be a destination Web site," Eberle said, explaining that Talon provides content for other Web sites, including GOPUSA. "The GOPUSA site is designed to be a destination site."

Eberle told the Chronicle that Talon's reporters are a mixture of volunteers and paid staffers, but he would not disclose how many reporters are on staff. The three stories posted on the Talon site Thursday had no bylines or datelines and seemed to involve no original reporting, taking quotes from televised news conferences and news releases.


How interesting. He doesn't mind if we know where he lives, or what his children's names are (look at the link), but he won't disclose how many "reporters" work for his "news service".

So there you have it. A coupla good ol' Texas boys who hated paying taxes and blamed that on th' libruls decided they had to "git th' truth out dere", so they worked their Rolodex a little, pumped in some of their own money, cut a few corners and presto! Big Media!

But how did Bobby Eberle get access without making any financial contributions to the GOP? Was it the "right people" he knew -- the ones who now say they never heard of him? Who greased the skids for them?

Texas is just chock full of these nuts, and now they've gone national.

They're about to take their act global, in case no one's noticed...
0 Replies
 
Joe Nation
 
  1  
Reply Sat 19 Feb, 2005 06:05 am
I was just trying to remember what the nuts did before the internet to spread their chunky truths to the world. Nuts of all persuasion have always been around, wearing their tinfoil hats, possessed by some demon we could not hear or see. The Communists used to have a line of people handing out flyers in front of folk concerts while the John Birch Society contented themselves with signs and placards, pointing fingers. There is still a large group of black activists who preach their view of the world on the street corners near Times Square and the LaRouche believers set up their tables and wave their petitions to passersby daily. I get stopped by Greenpeace, the Lost Children's Fund (?) and the occasional Hari Krisna almost on a daily basis. You get to know which corner to zoom through.

But this internet news, news that really isn't news, news that is views, is something different. I was taught to consider the source, thus, I try to do so, but who are the sources in an anonymous world?

It is not who is John Galt? but who is Joe Nation?

Joe(What they do so well is fake sincerity)Nation
0 Replies
 
PDiddie
 
  1  
Reply Sat 19 Feb, 2005 06:15 am
Joe:

Direct mail. See Eberle, Bruce above, or Viguerie, Richard:

Quote:
In the 1960s, right-wing strategist Richard Viguerie -- in search of troops for a conservative revolution -- realized that one of the most effective ways to recruit small donors and foot soldiers was through a simple letter in their mailboxes. And the political direct-mail industry was born.

Written in blunt and alarmist language, Viguerie's direct-mail pieces tapped into conservative discontent on a range of issues, from taxes to immigration to the United Nations to abortion. His Virginia-based firm, now called American Target Advertising Inc., claims to have mailed more than a billion pieces of mail over four decades. Thousands of recipients responded with donations of $10 or $15. They helped fund a network of conservative think tanks, advocacy organizations and pressure groups that, Viguerie believes, has finally achieved its end with the reelection of President Bush.

"Now comes the revolution," Viguerie recently told conservatives, according to the New York Times.


Get ready for the "revolution" on the right
0 Replies
 
Brand X
 
  1  
Reply Sat 19 Feb, 2005 06:22 am
Dotty Lynch isn't exactly squeaky clean enough to be writing about political operatives....or to claim journalistic integrity.

Excerpt:

Quote:
In Lynch's her own words: "From 1972 until 1985 I worked in politics as a pollster for Democratic candidates and liberal causes. Most of the candidates, most notably Presidential contenders George McGovern, Jimmy Carter, Ted Kennedy and Gary Hart, were simpatico with my liberal values and I felt somewhat fulfilled in working through them to build a better society. I had become a very ardent feminist...."




Quote:
Lynch participated in a December 2004 C-SPAN panel. She agreed that the Swift Boat attacks had no basis in fact. To the suggestion that the MSM should have actually investigated what the "facts" were, before pronouncing them to be false, Lynch stated that since the public can only focus on a few sentences of a story, the MSM was justified in not investigating this "complex" Kerry story, because it would only confuse the public. That is, no investigation other than to solicit a denial from the Kerry campaign....


Linky
0 Replies
 
PDiddie
 
  1  
Reply Sat 19 Feb, 2005 08:32 am
Attacking the messenger for being a "feminist" (gasp!) does not in any way dilute the message.

Karl Rove knew about Jimmy/Jeff, and also probably knew about his escort sites (which are still live, as of this morning). Let me restate that, so that Brand X and anyone else who's having trouble with the relativity can clearly understand it:

Karl Rove knew there was a gay hooker masquerading as a journalist in the WH press room.

So the only question left to answer is:

Who at the White House has to be blown to get a press pass?
0 Replies
 
blatham
 
  1  
Reply Sat 19 Feb, 2005 09:07 am
Joe

Take another read of Ari's statement. He's an artist at spin and intimidation, probably the best I've seen, and his replacement seems clumsy in comparison.

Ari was so 'uncomfortable' that he didn't call on Gannon for an entire week. He was recomforted by a phone call to Eberle who said "We're not part of the official Republican party machine, thus we are independent".

Ari claims that's ok then. The criterion for WH briefing pass is "not officially hired by Republican Party". That's it. The 'reporter' elegible doesn't have to have any journalist credentials, he doesn't have to represent any reputable news service, he doesn't have to fulfill any traditional fifth estate function in a democratic society (perhaps preferable if he doesn't), and he certainly doesn't have to pass muster with any professional press society.
0 Replies
 
Brand X
 
  1  
Reply Sat 19 Feb, 2005 09:27 am
PDiddie wrote:
Attacking the messenger for being a "feminist" (gasp!) does not in any way dilute the message.

Karl Rove knew about Jimmy/Jeff, and also probably knew about his escort sites (which are still live, as of this morning). Let me restate that, so that Brand X and anyone else who's having trouble with the relativity can clearly understand it:

Karl Rove knew there was a gay hooker masquerading as a journalist in the WH press room.

So the only question left to answer is:

Who at the White House has to be blown to get a press pass?


Nice gloss-over, PD.

As you well know the point of my post wasn't that she's a feminist, who cares about that.?

She is was is, and will likely always will be a political operative.

In addition she all but braggs about not investigating a story because the publics attention span is just too short to grasp it. So how much did she leave out or omit in this story that she will later cop to...

In her case, due to her reputation, it is perfectly in line to question the messenger.
0 Replies
 
dyslexia
 
  1  
Reply Sat 19 Feb, 2005 10:34 am
well you gotta give ole Jeff/Jim credit where it's due, praise the lord. I love this comment he made, it's the mother of all segues.
Quote:
"People criticize me for being a Christian and having some of these questionable things in my past,"
he said.
Quote:
"I believe in a God of forgiveness."

well now, that just about clears up my concern for the WhiteHouse press corps, we can leave it to god to forgive them (for they know not what they do) and I was begining to think the entirety of the press corps was just a bunch of liberal atheists.
0 Replies
 
Joe Nation
 
  1  
Reply Sat 19 Feb, 2005 06:50 pm
Blatham: Take heart, I only said I liked Ari more, I didn't say I'd let him marry my sister. Here's why. Just having doubts reveals that he is not a true believer. It's hard or impossible for a press secretary to remain a true believer for long, they are one of the very small number of people who both know what the facts are and who have to speak around and about and between those facts in a public forum. The only other person who faces the press on a semi-regular basis is the President.

There is a difference between being the President and being the President's Press Secretary. The Press Secretary hangs around with members of the press and discovers three things: 1) the working press doesn't give a ratsass for politics, they want the story, 2) the working press can smell a lie the size of a popfart across a windy football field and 3) if you don't lie to them too often, the working press will take your lead on any story you feed them.

I think Ari, as have many before him, got sick to his stomach having to lie so many times a day, another sign that he is not a true believer.

What do you think? A conservative with a conscience?
Joe(The previous statements on this issue are non-operative)Nation
0 Replies
 
Cycloptichorn
 
  1  
Reply Sat 19 Feb, 2005 08:28 pm
Gannon looked like a fool on Anderson Cooper. Good job!

From www.dailykos.com :

Quote:

RAW STORY reports that the mainstream press is now "aggressively" on the Gannon story, noting that "the tenor of calls, it appears, has reached a fevered pitch":

Washington sources tell RAW STORY that calls are flying around the District as much of the mainstream press seeks to catch up with online reporting -- including some from such prestigious magazines as The New Yorker.

The wire services have also begun digging, sources say, which could place the Gannon scandal in hundreds of smaller newspapers across America.

Some suggest that the mainstream media -- which initially left blogs and online outlets like this site to flesh out the story-are now seeking to reestablish their grasp and perhaps break new elements of it themselves. [...]

Mainstream journalists are scrambling to be the first to hammer down a solid connection between President Bush's White House and the conservative reporter with a dubious history who was given daily access to White House briefings and invited to the White House Christmas party.


This oughta get real interesting real soon. The nice thing about the mainstream is that they have sources that most can only dream of...

As for the 'day pass for 2 years' deal,

Quote:
Getting White House day pass not so easy
by kos
Sat Feb 19th, 2005 at 09:14:42 PST

The Augusta Free press got one:
Yes, we have been through the process for obtaining White House day passes.

And let us just say that it is not at all an easy process to get through.

Needless to say that it is difficult to think that it could have been done using a fake name - the Secret Service needs your real name so it can do a background check on you before letting you inside the gate.

Several phone calls placed over the course of a two-week period were needed to get us inside.

And that was for a one-shot deal.


Cycloptichorn
0 Replies
 
PDiddie
 
  1  
Reply Sat 19 Feb, 2005 09:05 pm
Yeah, that was a real gay man-on-gay man smackdown by Anderson Vanderbilt. Truthfully, Andy stomped his balls off. Compared to Leslie Blitzer, at any rate.

More biff-pow from Frank Rich:

Quote:
If we did not live in a time when the news culture itself is divorced from reality, the story might end there: "Jeff," you'd assume, was a lapdog reporter from a legitimate, if right-wing, news organization like Fox, and you'd get some predictable yuks from watching a compressed video anthology of his kissing up to power. But as Mr. Olbermann explained, "Jeff Gannon," the star of the montage, was a newsman no more real than a "Senior White House Correspondent" like Stephen Colbert on "The Daily Show" and he worked for a news organization no more real than The Onion. Yet the video broadcast by Mr. Olbermann was not fake. "Jeff" was in the real White House, and he did have those exchanges with the real Mr. McClellan and the real Mr. Bush.


And here's the thud:

Quote:
By my count, "Jeff Gannon" is now at least the sixth "journalist" (four of whom have been unmasked so far this year) to have been a propagandist on the payroll of either the Bush administration or a barely arms-length ally like Talon News while simultaneously appearing in print or broadcast forums that purport to be real news. Of these six, two have been syndicated newspaper columnists paid by the Department of Health and Human Services to promote the administration's "marriage" initiatives. The other four have played real newsmen on TV. Before Mr. Guckert and Armstrong Williams, the talking head paid $240,000 by the Department of Education, there were Karen Ryan and Alberto Garcia. Let us not forget these pioneers - the Woodward and Bernstein of fake news. They starred in bogus reports ("In Washington, I'm Karen Ryan reporting," went the script) pretending to "sort through the details" of the administration's Medicare prescription-drug plan in 2004. Such "reports," some of which found their way into news packages distributed to local stations by CNN, appeared in more than 50 news broadcasts around the country and have now been deemed illegal "covert propaganda" by the Government Accountability Office.
0 Replies
 
PDiddie
 
  1  
Reply Sat 19 Feb, 2005 09:16 pm
Brand X wrote:
In addition she all but braggs about not investigating a story because the publics attention span is just too short to grasp it. So how much did she leave out or omit in this story that she will later cop to...

In her case, due to her reputation, it is perfectly in line to question the messenger.


If I were you, I wouldn't "bragg" about being unable to discern the difference between 'questioning the messenger' and smearing her -- that's what you intended; and incidentally, you failed -- by pointing out she identified herself as a feminist.

Why don't you try to explain why you think that's so bad?

Oh my, look what I found over at The Conservative Voice:

Quote:
John Aravosis at AMERICAblog.org has dug up seven websites where Jeff Gannon / James Guckert offers himself for sale as an "escort". Here is some mild text from one page "Ex-USMC Jock: Available for hourly, overnight, weekend or longer travel - OUT ONLY!"

Personal Trainer: Safe-Sane-Strenuous-Satisfying workouts, Sports training, and competition, especially wrestling....

Big SPORTS Fan: Will go to the game with you, then take you home and....

"AGGRESIVE, VERBAL, DOMINANT TOP. I DON'T LEAVE MARKS....ONLY IMPRESSIONS." Aravosis's article contains particulars on what "services" he offered, how much he charged, links to x-rated pictures of him, and Guckert's non-denials of any of this information.

One part in this story that has yet to surface is related to "Gannon"'s claim in his bio to have "taught in the public school system". Since Guckert's degree from West Chester University of Pennsylvania is in Physical Education, he presumably was a gym teacher. Many parents will be unhappy that boys' gym was taught by a gay prostitute that likes to wrestle, even if they can accept a discretely gay English teacher.

The bigger question is how did "Gannon" gain inside access to the White House only five days after Talon News Service was established? Was that long enough to run a background check? Did he have inside help? Did an earlier background check only turn up the problem that it would not look good if he were reporting for GOPUSA?

Finally there are the blackmail questions which exist for gays who are not "out of the closet". Was Guckert blackmailing someone associated with the White House? Was somebody blackmailing Guckert or using Guckert's services to blackmail someone else?

"Gannon" definitely got special treatment from the White House. So far the White House has denied this, saying anybody in a similar position could get daily press passes. Refusing to acknowledge his special treatment only leads to speculation that blackmail is somehow involved.


This is really starting to look bad. I better put on my glasses... Cool
0 Replies
 
squinney
 
  1  
Reply Sun 20 Feb, 2005 06:37 am
Some insight into the Bush/Gannon / Eberle connection. You know, the Eberle's Ari claimed to not know...


Quote:
2/19/2005
The missing link? Partner of GOPUSA founder has checkered past as Republican moneyman

Did Bruce Eberle get Gannon top White House access?

By John Byrne | RAW STORY Editor

Reporters in Washington are scrambling to explain how a reporter with a dubious past got access to the president, and how his boss-a relative nobody in Republican Party circles-scored an exclusive interview with Bush's closest advisor, Karl Rove.

The tangled web of how a minor website got such high-level access, and possibly classified information, may have begun to unravel.

RAW STORY has found a solid connection between the founder of Talon News and GOPUSA and a well-connected relative and business partner whose links to Bush advisors, dubious fundraising and marketing activities and paid commentators abound.

Bruce W. Eberle-a member of the Bobby Eberle "clan" (according to his former website which Bobby bought), the founder of GOPUSA and Talon News-may be the missing link.

Many have wondered how Bobby Eberle, an former engineer with no journalism experience who never donated to a political campaign managed to get Jeff Gannon so deep into the White House. Bobby received money from the Republican Party just once-a meager $165 for travel expenses when he spoke to the Smith County Republicans in East Texas. He did not receive an honorarium.

But Bruce Eberle has donated to the Party. He and his wife Katherine each gave $2,000 to the Bush reelection campaign, the highest allowable by law.

And what's more, he's raised money; Bruce boasts of raising more than $270 million for various organizations and campaigns, the vast plurality of them conservative. His clients have included Ronald Reagan, Pat Buchanan, Oliver North and former Bush Attorney General John Ashcroft.

Bruce's firm, Bruce W. Eberle & Associates, is also a top corporate sponsor of the Conservative Political Action Conference. Vice President Dick Cheney and top Bush advisor Karl Rove spoke at the conference Thursday.

Both Rove and Bruce worked for Attorney General John Ashcroft; Bruce took over for Rove when Rove sold his consulting firm to join Bush's presidential campaign. Both made much of their money in direct-mail fundraising.

But more salient, perhaps, is Bruce's dabbling in below-the-radar media activity, in which he pioneered a system which boasted of blurring the boundaries between advertising, polling and talk radio.

Bruce also owns the Omega List Company, which manages and rents donor mailing lists. Beginning in 2000, it began selling similar services for e-mail, boasting that it was "a pioneer in the endorsement e-mail field."

According to the Editor of PR Watch Sheldon Rampton, who wrote an article about it at the time, the Omega List website once featured a presentation by conservative talk radio personality Blanquita Cullum, who explained how "endorsement e-mail" effaced the boundaries between paid advertising, opinion polling and talk radio.

"You do what you do best!" Cullum said, in a feature that has since been removed. "Get on the air and talk to your listeners! Drive them to your website by conducting a daily survey or a contest on the topic of your choosing." Eberle's software then captured the names of respondents and added them to a donor list.

"What happens next is a cakewalk," Cullum added. "Omega will call you with an opportunity to send an endorsement e-mail to your list . . . and receive a royalty for lending your name to a cause, organization or product you believe in. . . . Omega gives you their specialized software absolutely FREE and presents you with an opportunity to earn an extra $25,000 or more annually."

Bruce has also been at the vanguard of conservative activism on the Internet.

After the 2000 presidential election, Bruce ran a website called AlGoreLost.org, which sought to derail a Florida recount by soliciting email addresses in a petition drive supporting then-Florida Secretary of State Katharine Harris, Sheldon says. The site failed to disclose that it was run by Eberle's firm.

AlGoreLost.org later became MillionsOfAmericans.com, which joined Bobby's GOPUSA in March 2004.

At the time, Bruce noted that GOPUSA had collected 50,000 opt-in email addresses. Given Bruce's background in email harvesting, the comment may signal the two had been working together much earlier.

According to PR Watch, Eberle also once ran a website which promised to donate 25 cents to the "conservative cause of choice" for each visitor to the site. The real purpose of the site was less charitable: by signing up, visitors had their emails added to a potential donor directory. Their "cause of choice" indicated the initiatives they would likely support in future appeals.

The list of causes to which Eberle promised to "give" his quarters, wrote Sheldon, were his own clients, including the Linda Tripp Defense Fund, Oliver North's Freedom Alliance and a fund claiming to defend police officers accused of brutality.

Bruce counted the police officers who beat Rodney King as clients. He also at one point claimed to be raising money for Paula Jones' defense fund, though the institute which actually paid Jones' legal bills said they never received any money.

Bruce's fundraising has drawn ire and repeated charges of ethical misconduct, even from Republicans.

In the mid-1990s, it was discovered that some $1.9 million of $2.2 million raised to "rescue" Vietnam prisoners of war was spent on "fundraising expenses" paid to Bruce's firm. No prisoners of war were ever rescued, or, for that matter, even reported.

Senator John McCain (R-AZ)-who was once a Vietnam prisoner of war himself-called Bruce and his associates "criminals and some of the most craven, most cynical and most despicable human beings to ever run a scam."

While working with Ashcroft, Bruce gave him a donor list valued at $1.7 million in apparent violation of campaign finance laws, according to ethics groups.

In July 1998, the St. Louis Post-Dispatch revealed that at least 50 percent of Ashcroft's political action campaign money, intended for Republican candidates, had been paid to firms controlled or associated with Eberle.

Bobby and Bruce's "relations" are nebulous-they have been reported not to

be blood relatives by a conservative website, though Bruce himself says they are members of the same "clan." Bobby works out of Texas; Bruce's firm is based in Virginia.

Clarification: Some have noted that Bobby and Bruce are not close relatives, an assertion this article never alleged. Bobby and Bruce have not commented on their relations, though they did press the Houston Chronicle, which incorrectly reported that they were brothers. Human Events, a conservative website which prints articles from Bobby's firm, says they are not blood relatives; Bruce himself says that Bobby is a member of the Texas Eberle "clan."


Missing Link In Eberle Story
0 Replies
 
squinney
 
  1  
Reply Sun 20 Feb, 2005 06:58 am
And the Freepers still don't get it
0 Replies
 
Joe Nation
 
  1  
Reply Sun 20 Feb, 2005 07:24 am
So who did the background check on Jeff Gannon? Where is it? And I'd give the same advice to the reporters in the White House Briefing Room that they gave to airline passengers after 9-11, look and see who is that sitting beside you.

The real question is can the right ever do news legitimately, that is truthfully? There is a real difference between slants and biases and actually shaving and shaping the facts to meet a particular idealogy, Rush Limbaugh has been doing this for years under the guise of being an entertainer and now we have both CNN and FoxNews doing it while purporting to be journalists. White House political strategists said they intended to create their own reality, the fake reporters and the paid-off reporters are just part of the larger right wing propaganda mill.

What is it like at a right wing press story meeting???

Is there a crisis in funding Social Security? We don't have to research this, the White House has already said it so it must be so.

Are the governments of Syria and Iran any more legitimate than the previous one in Iraq? Uh..... somebody call the WH and ask what we should say.

Should the man who, just as much as Ollie North, aided the contras in Nicaragua be in charge of US Intelligence. (BTW no intelligence gathering experience, been a user though.) Shucks, why even ask? Just rubber stamp the guy and move on to the weather report which we are proud to present almost as God intended.

Joe(It's not the way it is that counts, it's the way we say it is.)Nation
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.07 seconds on 12/23/2024 at 02:11:41