1
   

Jeff Gannon, Jim Guckert, and... Prostitution?

 
 
Cycloptichorn
 
  1  
Reply Thu 5 May, 2005 11:46 am
Nice to see ya LW

Cycloptichorn
0 Replies
 
Lightwizard
 
  1  
Reply Thu 5 May, 2005 12:02 pm
You can see me? Oh, dear, it's actually "1984" and I'm on the gallery computer so be assured I'm not having sex.
0 Replies
 
Lightwizard
 
  1  
Reply Thu 5 May, 2005 12:06 pm
Although this could provoke a comment about liberals looking at people through their computers, the despot in "1984" was considerably more right wing and isn't trying to insist that 2 and 2 are 5 tantamount to insisting the world was created just over 6,000 years ago?
0 Replies
 
Cycloptichorn
 
  1  
Reply Thu 5 May, 2005 12:06 pm
Yes, it is tantamount.

Cycloptichorn
0 Replies
 
McGentrix
 
  1  
Reply Thu 5 May, 2005 12:20 pm
Cycloptichorn wrote:
Me:
Quote:
Republicans will try to make this issue seem as if those who are attacking the WH are anti-gay, or searching into people's private lives, or just head-hunting for excuses. But none of that is true.

Why?

Because there's no problem that Guckert is gay (though it does provide quite the irony), only that he's a prostitute, which I don't have a huge problem with but I hardly think is a suitable background for access to the WH or questioning our CIC, thanks very much.


McGentrix wrote:
It's interesting how homophobic the left really is. All those consternations about conservatives being homophobic when discussing homosexual marriage is merely a smoke screen apparently.

Verrrrry interesting...


That didn't take long. Take your failed attempt at defending this guy elsewhere; noone on the left here is charging that the guy shouldn't have been let in b/c he's gay. Sheesh!

Cycloptichorn


Just a reminder...
0 Replies
 
Cycloptichorn
 
  1  
Reply Thu 5 May, 2005 12:32 pm
Just a reminder, Pdiddie wasn't putting forth an argument that the guy shouldn't be let in b/c he's gay, or that the ISSUE was that G/G was gay, he was making a JOKE about the President and his homosexual tendencies.

Sheesh. Another nice one-liner from ya, though.

Cycloptichorn
0 Replies
 
Lightwizard
 
  1  
Reply Thu 5 May, 2005 04:24 pm
Anyone who struts around like they are wearing a butt plug has to be suspect.
0 Replies
 
Ethel2
 
  1  
Reply Thu 5 May, 2005 06:29 pm
Feeling you oats lately, LW? Nice to see ya too.

LOL. Perfect description of GW. Very funny. <clutching tummy, laughing>
0 Replies
 
Lightwizard
 
  1  
Reply Thu 5 May, 2005 11:06 pm
After all the really cruel jokes Jay Leno has heaped on Mr. Bush, the First Lady shows up on a Tonight Show interview proving who really has the balls in her family.

Also, is it my imagination or are George's eyes getting beadier? He's looking more and more like proverbial the deer caught in the headlights.

I don't believe it will help him zero in on any more problems -- this is looking like the first eight year president as a lame duck in the final term. Maybe another horrible terrorist attack can bring up his poll numbers, Reach any conclusions from that you wish.
0 Replies
 
Ticomaya
 
  1  
Reply Fri 6 May, 2005 10:17 am
Lightwizard wrote:
Anyone who struts around like they are wearing a butt plug has to be suspect.


Although his waddle cannot possibly be confused with a "strut," Michael Moore seems to fit your description adequately, and should be added to your list of suspects.
0 Replies
 
Lightwizard
 
  1  
Reply Fri 6 May, 2005 10:22 am
Cheap shot.

No. 1: that ain't a waddle, it's a strut. Ducks don't tuck their assh***s in like they are at military attention.

Haven't really examined Moore's walking style -- if you are, you're paying much to close attention.
0 Replies
 
Ethel2
 
  1  
Reply Fri 6 May, 2005 10:28 am
It's Michael Moore's tummy that appears to be full rather than his assh**e. I'll leave it at that. Something to think about.
0 Replies
 
Ticomaya
 
  1  
Reply Fri 6 May, 2005 10:30 am
Oh, I see. You can comment on Bush's beady eyes, but I can't remark about Michael Moore's tremendous girth without you calling it a "cheap shot." You need to get over your thin skin with regard to your rotund hero.

As it regards "waddle," I was referring to Moore, not Bush. I've not examined his gait either, but considering the tonnage he's moving around, one can only assume it's more a listing waddle than a strut.
0 Replies
 
Ethel2
 
  1  
Reply Fri 6 May, 2005 10:38 am
Well, it would be a strut, if he could stand up straight. You should be glad for Moore's fat. Just think how well he could get around, the good he could do if he were more physically fit.
0 Replies
 
Lightwizard
 
  1  
Reply Fri 6 May, 2005 10:38 am
Ticomaya wrote:
Lightwizard wrote:
Anyone who struts around like they are wearing a butt plug has to be suspect.


Although his waddle cannot possibly be confused with a "strut," Michael Moore seems to fit your description adequately, and should be added to your list of suspects.


Where's the part that Moore's weight came into the discussion? The cheap shot was to characterize Bush's strut with a "waddle," which you now try to explain is Moore's walking style, presumably because of his weight. As articulate as you usually are with the language, I think you lost something here.

I will give you:

Bush, a strut due to the butt plug.

Moore, a waddle due to the usual center-of-gravity problem of many of those who are overweight.

As for Bush's beady eyes, his consistently vacant stare exasperates the problem.
0 Replies
 
Lightwizard
 
  1  
Reply Fri 6 May, 2005 10:40 am
Lola wrote:
Well, it would be a strut, if he could stand up straight. You should be glad for Moore's fat. Just think how well he could get around, the good he could do if he were more physically fit.


Perhaps Moore should take the Kirstie Alley route and come up with a series:

"Fat Filmmaker"?
0 Replies
 
Ethel2
 
  1  
Reply Fri 6 May, 2005 10:42 am
It you can't get the best of a problem, laughing helps.
0 Replies
 
Lightwizard
 
  1  
Reply Fri 6 May, 2005 10:43 am
Lola wrote:
Well, it would be a strut, if he could stand up straight. You should be glad for Moore's fat. Just think how well he could get around, the good he could do if he were more physically fit.


Well, this is also a symptom of having the weight of the world he's created on his shoulders. His posture has become slouchy of late.

Perhaps he had fired the butt plug like a Cruise missle and it landed in Iraq.
0 Replies
 
Ticomaya
 
  1  
Reply Mon 9 May, 2005 07:14 am
Lightwizard wrote:
Ticomaya wrote:
Lightwizard wrote:
Anyone who struts around like they are wearing a butt plug has to be suspect.


Although his waddle cannot possibly be confused with a "strut," Michael Moore seems to fit your description adequately, and should be added to your list of suspects.


Where's the part that Moore's weight came into the discussion? The cheap shot was to characterize Bush's strut with a "waddle," which you now try to explain is Moore's walking style, presumably because of his weight. As articulate as you usually are with the language, I think you lost something here.


Regardless of how articulate I may usually be, it's obvious I still have no control over your reading comprehension.
0 Replies
 
Lightwizard
 
  1  
Reply Mon 9 May, 2005 08:02 am
The implication was that Moore's waddle is caused by his wearing a butt plug. Doesn't go along with the joke that Gannon/Guckert has also been in the White House several times were he signed in but didn't sign out. Who is he serving? It's the Gay Motel where they check in and don't check out?

You're taking this much too seriously as I've also included a shot at Moore -- your inarticulation is comparing a hayseed to a watermelon.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.52 seconds on 05/05/2024 at 09:25:42