0
   

The Left Wing, On NBC

 
 
dyslexia
 
  1  
Reply Tue 1 Feb, 2005 01:40 pm
Oy it's a freakin' T.V. show. Who gives a rats asshole! (Is American Idol conservative or liberal?)
0 Replies
 
Dookiestix
 
  1  
Reply Tue 1 Feb, 2005 01:40 pm
Most of these modern American writers have GHOST writers (surprise). I'm sure McGentrix will have a heart attack with that little tidbit of knowledge.

As far as dumbing down is concerned, forget Hollywood. Faux News has that down to a science.
0 Replies
 
McGentrix
 
  1  
Reply Tue 1 Feb, 2005 01:45 pm
Lightwizard wrote:
Your list has no foundation and that's why you've posted no links. A drugged out conservative? The authors you list are assigned the lable of conservative by you. Sorry, but I doubt your credentials as an authority.


Yeah, that's about the level of response I expected.

Should I post a link to picture of my library? Would that help you? If you do not believe what I say, and that is fine and dandy, do your own research on these authors. Perhaps you could read the vast amount of stuff they have written.
0 Replies
 
Lightwizard
 
  1  
Reply Tue 1 Feb, 2005 01:46 pm
As far as TV fiction writing, you're right, Dookie. Which is why they hired the king of them all, Geraldo.

Sure it's only a TV show and what little I've watched is good writing for a TV show. So where's a conservative writer who can write a good political TV show? They have to know it's a great way to reach an audience, poltically or not politically inclined.
0 Replies
 
Lightwizard
 
  1  
Reply Tue 1 Feb, 2005 01:48 pm
I've read likely everything they've written. Go back to your 5'x 6' bookcase library and find one little statement that even hints of their political bent. I don't have to prove the opposite as you went out on a limb and made the dubious statement. Incidentally, my library takes up two rooms plus hundreds of books unpacked in the garage (since I moved into my townhouse) that I have no room for.
0 Replies
 
Lightwizard
 
  1  
Reply Tue 1 Feb, 2005 01:52 pm
(There's no Michael Crichton nor Tom Clancy in the lot).
0 Replies
 
McGentrix
 
  1  
Reply Tue 1 Feb, 2005 01:57 pm
I am surprised at your ignorance for being as well read as you claim to be.
0 Replies
 
Lightwizard
 
  1  
Reply Tue 1 Feb, 2005 02:04 pm
Oh, come on, McG, you know I'm pushing your buttons and you have to resort to a direct insult to justfy your statements.
0 Replies
 
Dookiestix
 
  1  
Reply Tue 1 Feb, 2005 02:06 pm
Quote:
Should I post a link to picture of my library?


And that would prove...?
0 Replies
 
Lightwizard
 
  1  
Reply Tue 1 Feb, 2005 02:10 pm
That he's got all of Mickey Spillane backed up against Herman Melville. I suppose that isn't any different than keeping the canned dog food next to the canned truffles.
0 Replies
 
McGentrix
 
  1  
Reply Tue 1 Feb, 2005 02:12 pm
Lightwizard wrote:
Oh, come on, McG, you know I'm pushing your buttons and you have to resort to a direct insult to justfy your statements.


It's hardly an insult. If you are as well read as you claim to be, you would realize that a large percentage of writers, playwrights, directors, producers, actors, etc (probably near 50% of them) claim to be conservative. I don't know you, for all I know, you have 2 rooms for of books by Al Frankin.
0 Replies
 
McGentrix
 
  1  
Reply Tue 1 Feb, 2005 02:13 pm
Lightwizard wrote:
That he's got all of Mickey Spillane backed up against Herman Melville. I suppose that isn't any different than keeping the canned dog food next to the canned truffles.


My favorite author is a flaming liberal.
0 Replies
 
ehBeth
 
  1  
Reply Tue 1 Feb, 2005 02:15 pm
McG - did you forget that the Baum books were banned in several counties and states as he was thought to promote communism? Definitely not a conservative writer - almost every book provides examples of how characters who can't do things individually can do things collectively/co-operatively. (this was part of my undergrad thesis work, so I've got way too much info on this topic)



edited to more correctly present my view (I don't think he was a communist)
0 Replies
 
Lightwizard
 
  1  
Reply Tue 1 Feb, 2005 02:17 pm
That's a completey general statement directly from your catalog of absurdities and you know it would be impossible for you to prove that 50% of all these artists are verifyable conservatives. I have no Al Franken in my library -- those particular political books are sometimes loaned to me (and I do return them after skimming through the discourse). You don't know me and I'm not here to publish my IQ nor back up any rash, unprovable statements like you seem to be determined to do.
I like the "claim" to be conservative -- nice qualification or should I say, rationlization.
0 Replies
 
Lightwizard
 
  1  
Reply Tue 1 Feb, 2005 02:19 pm
ehBeth wrote:
McG - did you forget that the Baum books were banned in several counties and states as he promoted communism? Definitely not a conservative writer - almost every book provides examples of how characters who can't do things individually can do things collectively/co-operatively. (this was part of my undergrad thesis work, so I've got way too much info on this topic)


He was using that old egghead trick of just pulling names out of the air and hoping nobody knows he's grasping for straws.
0 Replies
 
ehBeth
 
  1  
Reply Tue 1 Feb, 2005 02:25 pm
probably a bit more than random naming in the Baum case - he lives near Baum's hometown as I recall, and has mentioned it several times

(Emerald City location, and all)
0 Replies
 
McGentrix
 
  1  
Reply Tue 1 Feb, 2005 02:32 pm
0 Replies
 
Lightwizard
 
  1  
Reply Tue 1 Feb, 2005 02:39 pm
Maybe the benevolent Wizard of Oz will tell you to snap together your ruby slippers and go home. You could start by writing your own original posts instead of quoting without credit (I think that's called plagerism even in polite circles):

http://www.turnmeondeadman.net/OZ/BaumPolitics.html
0 Replies
 
McGentrix
 
  1  
Reply Tue 1 Feb, 2005 02:44 pm
You should read this one as well.

(Shame on me to post before I finish reading!)

In recent years, a number of scholars have pointed out inconsistencies between The Wizard of Oz and Populism.
In his 1991 book Populism: The Humane Preference in America, 1890-1900, Gene Clanton argued that Baum had indeed intended to write a political allegory. He agreed for the most part with Littlefield about the symbolism of each character with one important exception. To Clanton, the Wicked Witch of the West did not symbolize nature, but Populism itself. Clanton distinguished between right-wing and left-wing agrarian revolt and he pointed out that while Baum may have supported Bryan, he disliked the left-wing Populism that had such strong influence in the West. To Clanton, The Wizard of Oz was better suited to be an allegory of Progressivism rather than Populism.[15]

In Land of Desire, William Leach points to Baum's background in advertising and suggests that The Wizard of Oz does not offer any sort of Populist critique of capitalism. On the contrary, he argues, Baum wrote an upbeat story that affirmed the growing consumerism brought by industrial capitalism.[16]

Rather than a Populist critique of the excesses of capitalism, in this light The Wizard of Oz represents a pro-capitalist fable. Gretchen Ritter points out that it is possible to read The Wonderful Wizard of Oz as "poking fun at believers in the mysterious power of silver, criticizing the false value of green paper currency, and celebrating the power of gold when properly used by wise rulers."[17] She goes on to say that it's hard to refute the notion that Baum wrote a Populist allegory, given the prevalence of imagery the consistent with the Populist outlook. The alternate interpretations of The Wizard of Oz are certainly interesting but probably will not stop scholars from referring to The Wizard of Oz as a parable on Populism.
0 Replies
 
Lightwizard
 
  1  
Reply Tue 1 Feb, 2005 02:49 pm
Okay, you're off the hook with me at least, McG. I think this sparing match should cease, however. It's off the point of the topic and no Lusatania (sic) in sight. The point is why is the right not coming up to bat and countering "The West Wing" with a show of their own? Is the subject matter so dull it's not salable perhaps? Or there isn't any talent out there to put together a coherant production?
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
Copyright © 2025 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.19 seconds on 06/23/2025 at 02:46:37