@brianjakub,
Quote: So you are saying that most of the DNA code (the algorithm) and the enviroment and biology (operating system and the hardware for it to operate) were created before chixclub and have been operating basically automatically since then.
Youre not even close. You posed the statement qn now seem to wanna back of in a different direction. Its getting somewhat annoying to engage others by trying to be purposely evasive.
HERES WHAT YOU SAID< TO WHICH MY ANSWER WAS DIRECTED
Quote: All I am saying is that 90 percent of what we learn is from the mistakes we made. Vast extinctions are great opportunities for learning if intelligence is involved. The question is who are the intelligant people
Chixclub was merely a relevant example of how biological responses to cataclysmic events are already in motion even before the event. The event presents a natural selection process ---(not a design opportunity) period.
When Fairbanks made the comparison of DNA structures to a "bar code" , he never realized that some Fundamentalists would take this and run with a tale of a big spirit and an operating system.
We seem to understand how the genome works and how genes are preserved and changed and how all this happens in the ordinary biological world.How processes like methylation, folding, chromosomal duplicating, and Cas9 "snipping" (Among a whole lot of other mechanico-chemical means) work AND, we can also see evolution occurring without much initial gene involvement and how , except for two issues based upon Victorian ignorance, it all follows Darwins theory like a script. If I were you though, Id start with the areas in which Darwin fucked up , that, at least, has some counter data on deniability. That, and convergent evolution are two areas that, if I were a card carrying IDer, Id begin my searches there. Your insistance on an "Algorithm" is merely posing a
"If it were this... then that would happen" , argument, because you are totally evidence-free an not observing any of the rules of scientific inquiry.
Remember, a "theory" in science is also a fact, not a conjecture.