Are there still people who really believe that we have send men to the moon?

Forums: Science And Math
Email this Topic • Print this Page

It is unbelievable to me to see people still believing in this.
Once you start looking into it all, it becomes blatantly obvious we have never send men to the moon, At least not according to the official story,
Gee, even the 'moon' rocks were faked! And now even text alaysis of the atronauts show they have never been on the moon.

So, "That's one small step for [a] man, one giant leap for mankind”

Might be better like "That's one small hoax by one man, one giant Hoax for mankind"

Topic Stats
Top Replies
Link to this Topic

Type: Discussion • Score: 11 • Views: 31,349 • Replies: 172
Topic Closed

It is only "blatantly obvious" to crazy people.

1 Reply

@Hodgarrik,

Text analysis: You must be referring to the less famous line right after his giant leap for mankind remark: "All right chaps, that's a wrap, let's go soak up some pints over on 5th Avenue..."

1 Reply

@centrox,

Nope, and that is just an ad hominem with no argumental value at all.

1 Reply

@najmelliw,

Nope, I am referring to new text analysis.

0 Replies

Perhaps you could give us a link to this "new text analysis." (Oh god, semiotics, I suppose.) I'll tell you right now, if you provide a link to some youtube crap, you'll lose what little credibility you may still have.

"It must be true, it must be true . . . I seen it on the interwebs."

By the way, your English is very poor, which won't help your argument.

1 Reply

@Setanta,

of course my english is poor, girly! I am , luckily,far far away and english isn't my native language. so much for that crap, girly.

""It must be true, it must be true . . . I seen it on the interwebs." "

Another one of your stupidity! I have researched this way before the internet, but in all your stupidity you seem to like ti=o jump to very wrong conclusions.
will that continue? I am afraid it will, eh girly?

And why is a youtube video not good enough? It isn't good or bad by definition, it completely depends on its content, girly! Difficult eh?!

Now, if you really are convinced those astronots have been to the moon I am rather sure you must have some evidence then, eh?!

Oh, you have not? Hmmmm

3 Replies

@Hodgarrik,

Hodgarrik wrote:

of course my english is poor, girly! I am , luckily,far far away and english isn't my native language. so much for that crap, girly.

What was that you said about ad hominem? Or did you mean ad feminam?

1 Reply

@centrox,

once used at me I am good at throwing it too!

Now back on the topic cof the moon landing being a hoax.

Are people really that blind or is it a matter of The Emperor's Clothes?

2 Replies

@Hodgarrik,

So, after whining about "ad hominem" (sic) you leap right to personal sneers and insults. Your use of girly suggests that you're sexist as well as a bullshit artist. As it happens, I'm a man, girly.

As for evidence, I'll provide that right after you respond to my request for evidence. Got that "new text evidence" for us yet?

0 Replies

@Hodgarrik,

Hodgarrik wrote:

of course my english is poor, girly! I am , luckily,far far away and english isn't my native language. so much for that crap, girly.

""It must be true, it must be true . . . I seen it on the interwebs." "

Another one of your stupidity! I have researched this way before the internet, but in all your stupidity you seem to like ti=o jump to very wrong conclusions.
will that continue? I am afraid it will, eh girly?

And why is a youtube video not good enough? It isn't good or bad by definition, it completely depends on its content, girly! Difficult eh?!

Now, if you really are convinced those astronots have been to the moon I am rather sure you must have some evidence then, eh?!

Oh, you have not? Hmmmm

Funny that. I live thousands of miles away from the USA as well, and English is not my native language either. However, I dare say mine is a few grades above what you produced just there.

Also, might I just add that if you actually had done in depth research as to the moon landings being a hoax or not, especially based on text analysis, your English should be better than that. Because how can you either conduct text analysis, or judge text analysis, if you don't fully grasp the language said analysis was made in?

1 Reply

Below viewing threshold (view)

@najmelliw,

Oh no, here wo go again, it is getting silly isn't it?

"Funny that. I live thousands of miles away from the USA as well, and English is not my native language either. However, I dare say mine is a few grades above what you produced just there."

So what?

"Also, might I just add that if you actually had done in depth research as to the moon landings being a hoax or not, especially based on text analysis, your English should be better than that."

Well, your reading skills are terrible, that is an established fact now
I never wote that I did the text analysis.

Now let's stop with tis stupidity and on with the work,

There is NO evidence they went to the moon, hence they never went to the moon.

At least not woth the technology they showed us. That is for sure.

And why are people so afraid to see that? The domino effect?

1 Reply

@Hodgarrik,

Wasn't Buzz Aldrin punching you in the face once enough for you?

1 Reply

@jespah,

wll it showed how crazy and psychopathic Buzzie really was. And it was not me Wink

0 Replies

the fact that the moonrocks were even faked is telling enough of course.

0 Replies

@Hodgarrik,

Hodgarrik wrote:

"Also, might I just add that if you actually had done in depth research as to the moon landings being a hoax or not, especially based on text analysis, your English should be better than that."

Well, your reading skills are terrible, that is an established fact now
I never wote that I did the text analysis.

Whose reading skills are terrible, exactly? Might I point out the very next sentence I wrote, the one that you left out of your quote?

"Because how can you either conduct text analysis, or judge text analysis, if you don't fully grasp the language said analysis was made in?"

Hodgarrik wrote:

There is NO evidence they went to the moon, hence they never went to the moon.

At least not woth the technology they showed us. That is for sure.

And why, pray tell, is that? Why couldn't they have gone to the moon with the technology they showed us?

1 Reply

@najmelliw,

gee, you just continue, you are getting pathetic now I will leave you at that then.

and I started with the fake moon rocks. telling eh?

1 Reply

@Hodgarrik,

That's because delusional nonsense of the type you're spouting isn't worthy of debate.

Are there still people who really believe that we have send men to the moon?

Related Topics

Quick Links

My Account

able2know