DDT to Return as Weapon Against Malaria, Experts Say

gunga....again?!?!?

http://www.able2know.com/forums/about39091.html


The ultimate mass murderess (90 million dead so far and counting):

Consider the contrast:



Last summer, Canada appeared to be in a national state of shock when the young woman pictured above was released from the slammer after 12 years according to a deal made in 94. This was for being an accessory to two or three murders, and possibly a baker's half dozen rapes while essentially in a state of bondage similar to that of the Patricia Hurst case, i.e. whather Karla Homolka was even guilty of anything rating twelve years in prison was questionable.

All any of the pinkos and other leftists in Canada had to say about Karla Homolka was what an a$$hole she was, and that she deserved to hang.

Rachel Carson, on the other hand, is a hero to leftists and pinkos either because of or in spite of the 90,000,000+ people who have died of malaria and the billions who have suffered from it due to the banning of DDT. The difference might have something to do with the vast bulk of Rachel Carson's victims being negros, it's hard to say.

Genghis Khan used to think he was a serious murderer and I don't know what the figures actually are or whether it's possible to calculate a figure for him, but I'd be surprised if it came to more than about 25,000,000 in his own lifetime. Similarly, between Hitler, Stalin, Lenin, Mao Tse-Tung, and the sundry lunatics of our own age, it's doubtful if any of them were directly responsible for more than about 30,000,000 human deaths. Rachel Carson is at least three to one ahead of all of them.

What the hell does any of that have to do with DDT? Gunga, that makes absolutely no sense whatsoever.

Banning DDT has cost upwards of ninety million human lives, and it wasn't necessary. Yet another case of leftist junk science at work:

http://junkscience.com/ddtfaq.htm

Junk science indeed.

I love the claim that DDT was banned to kill millions of Africans to prevent overpopulation.

Quite the junk there Gunga.. junk for sure.

It only sounds funny until you think about it a bit. Question is, how many motives for wanting to kill 90 million people could there be in the world??

Or did you think the people espousing this lunatic policy didn't know what the policy would accomplish?

What sort of motive would make YOU want to kill 90,000,000 people?

My advice to Karla Homolka, on the off chance she might be reading A2K:

There is at least one well-paying job for which having been married to a psychopathic serial rapist is at least a plus if not an outright requirement: Consider running for US senator from the state of New York the next time the job comes open.

The only junk science is the stuff that occurs in you brain.

If something says DDT is dangerous, then the safest thing is to pull it out of circulation and to stop using it. However, I think recently someone has stated that the study was flawed. So its put back.

The flawed study had nothing to do with politics. It was a flawed study. That's it.

It's like the flawed study that showed the troposhere was cooling compared to the surface of the Earth and therefore supposedly proved that global warming wasn't happening. That wasn't conservative junk science. It was just flawed, that's all, and recent studies have corrected that flaw.

The claims that the studies about DDT were flawed aren't based on much science themselves.

Farmer has listed scientific study after study that Gunga refuses to address. He keeps going back to his same discredited source. Junkscience.com is full of junk.

Only thing is, now you and "farmerman" are in the position of having to claim that National Geographic is full of junk too.

Not at all Gunga...

If you had bothered to read the rest of the article or just the excerpts I quoted earlier you would see it wasn't junk at all. The National Geographic article disputes your junkscience crap.

I never said that National Geographic was in total agreement with junkscience.com.

Nonetheless farmerman and others here have maintained that DDT was totally ineffective and that very clearly is not the case. The clear impression anybody gets reading material from many sources INCLUDING NG is that DDT can still do things which nothing else can do, and at a miniscule fraction of the cost.

DDT is a legitimate candidate for greatest thing the whiteman ever invented.