@farmerman,
Quote:Lets see, how many times and in which order did I ask you for any evidence to support your beliefs.(AND: many and I asked fist).
All you do is ignore, so really, why should I give you some more education in something that you wont even take the time to analyze if it doesn't start with "let there be light".
I did not ignore your answers. You side step the question by explaining how the system works. I know the system works. I asked how the system originated. The answer to that questions is the proof you claim that you have for an origination from purely random origins. So please answer them.
Here is my answer.
Many scientists agree that the higgs field is a matrix of particles that fills all of empty space and gives matter mass. (also see quantum gravity) It has spatial density and that is what holds matter together through the strong and weak nuclear forces in the same way atmospheric pressure keeps the energy that is stored in a balloon in a balloon. (put a balloon in a vacuum and it explodes, take away the higgs field and all atoms would explode)
So by interpreting the evidence provided by modern science from the large hadron collider, the higgs field exists, and had to exist before matter could exist.
Further evidence suggests it is a matrix because, all particles of matter radiate energy exactly the same way, (every where, all the time).
wiki
Quote:Planck's law of black-body radiation
Main article: Planck's law
Planck's law states that[30]
(must click on link to see equation.)
https://wikimedia.org/api/rest_v1/media/math/render/svg/a2827e05f0d515a450bd8e30492b100d777031bd
where
Bν(T) is the spectral radiance (the power per unit solid angle and per unit of area normal to the propagation) density of frequency ν radiation per unit frequency at thermal equilibrium at temperature T.
h is the Planck constant;
c is the speed of light in a vacuum;
k is the Boltzmann constant;
ν is the frequency of the electromagnetic radiation;
T is the absolute temperature of the body.
For a black body surface the spectral radiance density (defined per unit of area normal to the propagation) is independent of the angle {\displaystyle \theta } \theta of emission with respect to the normal. However, this means that, following Lambert's cosine law, {\displaystyle B_{\nu }(T)\cos \theta } {\displaystyle B_{\nu }(T)\cos \theta } is the radiance density per unit area of emitting surface as the surface area involved in generating the radiance is increased by a factor {\displaystyle 1/\cos \theta } {\displaystyle 1/\cos \theta } with respect to an area normal to the propagation direction. At oblique angles, the solid angle spans involved do get smaller, resulting in lower aggregate intensities.
For B (Bolztmans constant), and h (Planck's constant) to have the constant values that they have "everywhere and all the time" there has to be a matrix like structure of the "virtual particles" of empty space (higgs bosons) and to the "real particles" that fill the space inside of atoms (quarks, electrons, anti quarks and positrons). It becomes simple geometry and Newtonian physicas to figure out that all electrons of matter are coupling with all the photons of the higgs field at approximately 60 degrees.
But, you have to be willing to ask what the structure looks like before you can get the 60 degree answer. And then you must accept that, "structures that "look" like that like aren't easily arrived at as the result of a Big Bang explosion caused by gravity. Especially since the the evidence suggests that gravity is an emergent entropic force that needs matter to emerge from in the first place making it hard for gravity to be the force behind matter creation.
They are having the same problem with Entropic gravity requiring a Baroque Structure like this implied (and I think obviously implied) matrix.
wiki
Quote:Criticism and experimental tests
Entropic gravity, as proposed by Verlinde in his original article, reproduces the Einstein field equations and, in a Newtonian approximation, a 1/r potential for gravitational forces. Since its results do not differ from Newtonian gravity except in regions of extremely small gravitational fields, testing the theory with earth-based laboratory experiments doesn’t appear feasible. Spacecraft-based experiments performed at Lagrangian points within our solar system would be expensive and challenging.
Even so, entropic gravity in its current form has been severely challenged on formal grounds. Matt Visser has shown[18] that the attempt to model conservative forces in the general Newtonian case (i.e. for arbitrary potentials and an unlimited number of discrete masses) leads to unphysical requirements for the required entropy and involves an unnatural number of temperature baths of differing temperatures. Visser concludes:
There is no reasonable doubt concerning the physical reality of entropic forces, and no reasonable doubt that classical (and semi-classical) general relativity is closely related to thermodynamics [52–55]. Based on the work of Jacobson [1–6], Thanu Padmanabhan [7– 12], and others, there are also good reasons to suspect a thermodynamic interpretation of the fully relativistic Einstein equations might be possible. Whether the specific proposals of Verlinde [26] are anywhere near as fundamental is yet to be seen — the rather baroque construction needed to accurately reproduce n-body Newtonian gravity in a Verlinde-like setting certainly gives one pause.
First of all the unnatural number of temperature baths can be accounted for if each piece of matter from a small group of atoms to a planet or star is a temperature bath storing energy that it receives from gravity.
It gives him pause for the same reason you can't blow up a box of legos a million times and expecting one time to end up with a lego house. The one time you end up with a house a child will always be involved as the designer. Its to bad Matt Visser cannot imagine somebody arranging each "real" and "virtual" particle of space to build the matrix science is requiring to finish the unification of physics, as easy as he can accept the fact that his child must have a key to the toy box that he locked up the legos in the day before and then came home to a lego house on the bedroom floor. (the toy box did not explode)
There is your evidence farmer. And the interesting thing is the 60 degree coupling angle was written in the bible long before modern day scientists started to discover it. I will guarantee Adam and Noah(whoever or whatever they represent in the bible) knew it though. Because, they passed on, (in oral tradition) that part of the bible that tells how the matrix was established (to an illiterate population that eventually developed written word and wrote it down).
So if gravity is an entropic emergent force that needs matter and a complex structure to exist, then gravity cannot be the driving force behind the creation of matter. Logic tells us that "a let there be light" explanation for the establishment of the higgs field (or something like it) might not be of your liking but, it might be the only logical one.
So, ask and I will explain in detail how the matrices of the Higgs field and matter were created and how they unify physics.
