Evolutionry/religious nonsense

SiO2 is a FORMULA. An equation would equate the formation of SiO2 (Ill use natures equation since silica is usually formed in super- heated water)

Si + 2H2O --> SiO2 + 2H2

Yes, your right.. including time

The work is done. It's in String theory, Entropic Gravity, Quantum Mechancis, Quantum Gravity, Entanglement, Borde, Guth, and Vilenkin’s Past-Finite Universe, Etc . . .



Life is stamped out because of the second law of thermal dynamics. Why wouldn't an Intelligent Designer follow its own laws. (what if he didn't make the Laws but his intelligence emerged from them like you seem to assume ours did). 90 percent of what I learn is from the mistakes I make. Because of the second law some mistakes lead to death.



That is where the answer is. And this is why I think so.

Most atoms in the universe appear exactly the same as they did the day they came into existence. (except for ones going through nuclear decay, fission or fusion.) The space inside those atoms are storing information perfectly for billions of years. That means the particles inside those atoms have been moving in virtually the same pattern for billions of years. (That is extreme order for an exrely long time.) But in the space we live in and where these atoms interact the heisenberg uncertainty principle is the rule. (no long term patterns with very limited predictability and the decay due to second law of thermal dynamics is the rule).

Understanding the reason why there is permanance (and I am assuming predictability) in the space inside an atom, and very little permanence and predictability in the space we live in will take us a long way to understanding the Theory of Everything. (and why you and I are dying)

I cannot look for the answer to those questions without TRYING TO CONFLATE COSMOGENESIS an QUANTUM MECHANICS TO BIOLOGY.

https://arxiv.org/abs/0907.1968 That is a great article by a reputable scientist. https://arxiv.org/find/physics/1/au:+Sergi_A/0/1/0/all/0/1

I think I came up with a good explanation, but like you pointed out I was approaching it from an ID Catholic presumption. That means scientists cannot acknowledge my work until I disinfect it back to pure naturalism. That will take me some time to rewrite. Till then here is the very rough draft if you are interested. embeddeddimensions.com

Note, you will have to stomach my initial presumptions, and biases to read it. If you can't do that, all I can say is that work is in process.

Laws are information stored since the beginning of the universe. Back then they were new information. The main difference between the new information I think of today and the Laws of physics are, "when I create something is my information is newer and less permanent".

The ancient information in the universe is screaming at us, "decipher me"

I agree with your choice of music.

I think I know what you mean here but what you are trying to do is called 'Abductive Reasoning', not 'conflation'.
Here's the definition from Wikipedia:


Many here probably would not accept it as a valid approach.

One thing leads to another

no, its conflation. In abductive reasoning you have similitude in substance, in conflation its similitude of words

Thanks for the input leadfoot.

Cosmogenisis is the process where matter and the laws of physics were established.

Abiogenisis is the process where the rules of evolution of biology by natural selection were established.

Both are similar for these reasons:

They are processes that initiated major changes to the physical universe.

We have no idea how they happened beyond pure speculation.

They both depend entirely upon the laws or rules of Quantum Mechanics and Relativity for their processes to be successful because, Quantum Mechanics and Relativity are the underlying rules these processes must follow for the processes to be maintained long enough to reach fruition.

Here is my question. How can you talk about and understand the evolution of biology by natural selection, abiogenisis, and cosmogenisis without talking about how the underlying rules in the universe initiated those processes and are still guiding them today?

It seems to me that to understand the initiation and the evolution of the universe and biology we first must understand the physical processes that cause gravity and the nuclear forces to emerge from the physical universe. And when I say understand I mean draw a picture of how space and matter interact to give us relativity and quantum mechanics. Experiencing the picture is true understanding.

If I understand correctly... how are we going to do this without understanding what lies within space? This is similar to understanding the genome without understanding genetic dark matter (the apparent non-encoding structure?)

We have a lot of data from experiments with particle accelerator, Bose Einstien condensates, Gravitational lensing, black holes, dark matter, dark energy Holographs etc. . . We have looked at the space time continuum and matter from so many different points of view and interpreted the data in so many different ways, how could we not tie it all together into a coherent picture. It just takes a little creative imagination.

Its easier to explain why a plane has lift if you have a picture of a wing rather than equations describing the hydraulics and lift created by the airflow around the wing. It's nearly impossible with just the math. The thing about air though is we can see and sense it. We can't sense empty space but we can see light flow around matter in an eclipse. There is something there that has structure and structure means particles or pilot waves arranged in a specific way. We just need to figure out how they are arranged in empty space away from gravitational lensing. The pattern built in the structure of empty space must be very simple and is the same everywhere. A little less complex than the genetic code.

Well, whatever it is in space seems to surround our environment and all other environments. Some theories suggest plasma?

I believe a quantized, entangled and highly ordered plasma. (That is ordered in empty space where there is no interference with matter),

I suggested matter as we observe it (planets, stars, galaxies) is surrounded by plasma but it may be this matter actually swims in it. sorta like blood plasma.

A question that comes to mind is whether or not this plasma might carry information?

I believe (and I think I can prove it) every piece of space is made up of pilot waves that look like something similar to 1/2 of a hydrogen atom entangled in a matrix. This is what I imagine what the pattern of the higgs field looks like if you are interested. see page 14 embeddeddimensions.com

Well, I think my truth is I'm not going to prove anything outside of reason. I've heard it said that physics isn't math. That physics has more to do with contemplation than number.