14
   

Me Too

 
 
maxdancona
 
  0  
Wed 17 Jan, 2018 08:41 pm
@nimh,
I think the Aziz Ansari story represents the end of the MeToo movement. The anonymous woman was a grownup who was capable of leaving at any time. This is completely unlike rape where a perpetrator has all the power and the victim is unable (not just unwilling) to say "No".

The story is at its face ridiculous. She complains about the wine he offers. The nature of the encounter is not at all unclear when she agreed to go to his apartment. She then goes into his apartment. The real issue here is this ridiculous idealized version of casual sex, where super-sensitive men who are in tune with their partners after spending a couple of hours with them that they can anticipate their partners feelings and deny their own.

We are talking about casual sex. Two people engaged in an emotional irrational passionate act. The rule should be simple; when someone says "stop", you stop. Translating grunts, sighs or hand motions aren't part of deal. If you think that casual sex is for some sort of idealized chivalrous pursuit where people take the time to carefully consider each action... you really are missing the point.

People who don't want casual sex in all its messiness shouldn't be having casual sex. And, people who choose casual sex should be responsible for their own choices.
0 Replies
 
edgarblythe
 
  1  
Wed 17 Jan, 2018 08:47 pm
nimh
 
  2  
Wed 17 Jan, 2018 09:34 pm
@edgarblythe,
The woman in that clip:

Quote:
Non-verbal communication is not clear, right ... which is why it's so incredibly important to verbally communicate that you're not interested. Which she eventually did - and immediately after she did that, he complied. OK?

What the story actually recounted:

Quote:
When Ansari told her he was going to grab a condom within minutes of their first kiss, Grace voiced her hesitation explicitly. “I said something like, ‘Whoa, let’s relax for a sec, let’s chill.’” She says he then resumed kissing her, briefly performed oral sex on her, and asked her to do the same thing to him. [...] Ansari also physically pulled her hand towards his penis multiple times throughout the night, from the time he first kissed her on the countertop onward. “He probably moved my hand to his dick five to seven times,” she said. “He really kept doing it after I moved it away.” [...]

Grace says she spent around five minutes in the bathroom, collecting herself in the mirror and splashing herself with water. Then she went back to Ansari. He asked her if she was okay. “I said I don’t want to feel forced because then I’ll hate you, and I’d rather not hate you,” she said. She told babe that at first, she was happy with how he reacted. “He said, ‘Oh, of course, it’s only fun if we’re both having fun.’ [..] Then he said, ‘Let’s just chill over here on the couch.’” [...] When she sat down on the floor next to Ansari, who sat on the couch, [...] Ansari instructed her to turn around. “He sat back and pointed to his penis and motioned for me to go down on him. [...] Then he brought her to a large mirror, bent her over and asked her again, “Where do you want me to **** you? Do you want me to **** you right here?” He rammed his penis against her ass while he said it, pantomiming intercourse. [...]

“After he bent me over is when I stood up and said no, I don’t think I’m ready to do this, I really don’t think I’m going to do this. And he said, ‘How about we just chill, but this time with our clothes on?’” They got dressed, sat side by side on the couch they’d already “chilled” on, and he turned on an episode of Seinfeld. [...] While the TV played in the background, he kissed her again, stuck his fingers down her throat again, and moved to undo her pants. She turned away. [...] “I remember saying, ‘You guys are all the same, you guys are all the ******* same.’” Ansari asked her what she meant. When she turned to answer, she says he met her with “gross, forceful kisses.”

After that last kiss, Grace stood up from the couch, moved back to the kitchen island where she left her phone, and said she would call herself a car. He hugged her and kissed her goodbye, another “aggressive” kiss. When she pulled away, Ansari finally relented and insisted he’d call her the car.

So, in her telling at least, she actually "verbally communicated" that she wasn't interested in what he was doing at least three times, in different ways. That, although she was up for some intimacy, he was going too fast; that she was feeling forced; that she wasn't ready to do this. And instead of complying "immediately after she did that" as the woman in the video states, he went right back to trying each time and only relented when she finally got up to call herself a cab.

I mean, I feel there are different lessons in the story in different directions, and plenty of room for nuance in how to define what happened -- some of the stories I linked to in my previous post are really good on that, better than anything I'd say. This is also her side of the story, and he likely has different memories that may be no less honest and yet very different. But still: there's little gained by misrepresenting the woman's story.
Olivier5
 
  1  
Thu 18 Jan, 2018 03:01 am
@nimh,
Quote:
she actually "verbally communicated" that she wasn't interested in what he was doing at least three times, in different ways

The key point for me is that she never ever said what she positively wanted, not even in her online account of her story. It's not clear what she had in mind when going to his apartment. A night with a celebrity? Some kind of sex? A new friend? A good chat? The beginning of a romance? A juicy bit of gossip to tell the girls? A good game of backgammon?

You can't get what you want till you say what you want.
0 Replies
 
Olivier5
 
  1  
Thu 18 Jan, 2018 03:29 am
@nimh,
Thanks for a thoughtful post, first of. I've been reading a lot of similar blogs, posts abd articles as you posted so not intent to read more at this point.

What is happening is very disappointing to me personally, downright heartbreaking, because I have always supported gender equality and 'second wave feminism' (I'm getting better at understanding the feminist waves, for what it's worth). Feminism as a form of humanism. And this form of intellectually honest feminism is losing out, being decimated on the social media front by hordes of antiman furies.

I sense a strong change in the force... As is thousands of past female thinkers and activists and their books and ideas had been thrown out in a gigantic fire. As if thousands of men who counted themselves as feminist allies were being thrown overboard the feminist ship. It's tragic.

Quote:
if you look at what people are saying here as a set of norms that can leave fewer people traumatized and make sex better -- for everyone; and that a new generation in particular is setting out to hold up better than many of us did ... that can't not be a good thing, no?

My sense what's happening is in fact more trauma. More hatred. More injustice.
centrox
 
  2  
Thu 18 Jan, 2018 04:27 am
Regarding verbal and non-verbal signals: I once (in the 1980s) got in a situation where I was in bed with a woman, we had dated a couple of times, I was at her apartment and she said "You can stay the night but I don't want to have sex". In bed we did lots of kissing, heavy petting, removal of underwear, etc, including her grasping my manhood (sorry to be so explicit). I felt at the time (still do) that if a woman says "no", then she means "no", and it was my duty to respect that. Also I had my pride. So I did not proceed to attempt penetration. Couldn't really. Penis willing, head unsure. Not a good combination. The next morning, she said, in a rather patronizing way, "I don't want you to feel bad that nothing happened last night." I was on the brink of blurting out "But you said you didn't want to have sex!", but I kind of sensed that I had clearly got into a kind of mind game that I didn't like, and held my tongue. I knew some other guys might have interpreted the signs the other way. I also knew that I wasn't (and didn't want to be) one of those other guys. I conjectured that such a guy might have had a different remark in the morning, and not necessarily a favourable one.
centrox
 
  2  
Thu 18 Jan, 2018 04:37 am
@nimh,
Quote:
he ... stuck his fingers down her throat

I've clearly lived too long... this was never something we did when I was a-dating. That is totally gross, invasive, and weird. Not to mention dangerous (surely?).


0 Replies
 
edgarblythe
 
  1  
Thu 18 Jan, 2018 05:39 am
@centrox,
I would have handled your situation the same way.
0 Replies
 
Olivier5
 
  2  
Thu 18 Jan, 2018 06:10 am
@centrox,
Good story. It took me a long while to figure it out, but IMVMO (in my very male opinion), when they "sense your manhood" as you say, they are usually trying to send a clear non-verbal cue that they would appreciate a piece of it.

That, or they're testing the equipment to assess whether or not they ought to have a piece of it.

I have a similar story. In highschool I had a very close female friend, we were always together after school and at recess, really enjoying each other's company a whole lot. She was firmly standing at the center of my "friend zone", as you guys would say. When male friends would ask me if we were together, I would say "no, just friends". Copain-copine, as we say. As far as I was concerned, it was by all account a beautiful friendship. Now of course it dawned on me that if she was always sticking with me like that, maybe it was not for my ideas about Patty Smith or sci-fi. Maybe she loved me more than I was ready to love her.

Years later, still clueless, I visited her for a couple of days in a small city by the ocean where she was living as a sole parent of two kids. I knew the two fathers from highschool, assholes who had beaten her in one case, and dropped her when she got pregnant in the second case. It's a sad story. They were nevertheless happy enough, in a smallish but fine apartment -- my friend had a steady job, had become a judo instructor, beautiful kids. We had a nice dinner and chatted and chatted and then later went to bed. There was a couch in the corridor but she invited me in her kingsize bed. I started to wonder if she had something in mind. So, we're both laying there and I stay there totally rigid, me being me, timid to a fault, unable to vocalize any feeling or desire to any woman, even to a long time friend. Particularly to a long time friend, I should say. I didn't want to lose her friendship at any cost, couldn't risk to come across as just another asshole trying to abuse of her hospitality... I made no move whatsoever, tried to stop thinking about it and sleep.

Then she started sobbing. I didn't know what to do. I asked what was the problem, she kept silent, crying on her side of the bed. I thought she was afraid of me, she was scared I would rape her, knowing what she'd been through with the father of one of her children. I kept trying to speak about it, without touching her. At some point she stopped and said it was nothing, and then i went to sleep.

I now think she was going around a bout of self-depreciation along the lines of "I brought him into my bed and he doesn't want me. If it was any other woman he would be all over her right now... I must be the ugliest girl in the universe... damaged good." Something like that. I should have stroke her hair, taken her hand, cracked a stupid joke, cuddled her, massaged neck. And more if necessary. But she never asked, and I couldn't guess.
0 Replies
 
maxdancona
 
  0  
Thu 18 Jan, 2018 10:53 am
@Olivier5,
Olivier5 wrote:

What is happening is very disappointing to me personally, downright heartbreaking, because I have always supported gender equality and 'second wave feminism' (I'm getting better at understanding the feminist waves, for what it's worth). Feminism as a form of humanism. And this form of intellectually honest feminism is losing out, being decimated on the social media front by hordes of antiman furies.

I sense a strong change in the force... As is thousands of past female thinkers and activists and their books and ideas had been thrown out in a gigantic fire. As if thousands of men who counted themselves as feminist allies were being thrown overboard the feminist ship. It's tragic.

Quote:
if you look at what people are saying here as a set of norms that can leave fewer people traumatized and make sex better -- for everyone; and that a new generation in particular is setting out to hold up better than many of us did ... that can't not be a good thing, no?

My sense what's happening is in fact more trauma. More hatred. More injustice.


A similar observation was made by Margaret Atwood (writer of the Handmaid's Tale).

Quote:
If the legal system is bypassed because it is seen as ineffectual, what will take its place? Who will be the new power brokers? It won't be the Bad Feminists like me. We are acceptable neither to Right nor to Left. In times of extremes, extremists win. Their ideology becomes a religion, anyone who doesn't puppet their views is seen as an apostate, a heretic or a traitor, and moderates in the middle are annihilated.

Fiction writers are particularly suspect because they write about human beings, and people are morally ambiguous. The aim of ideology is to eliminate ambiguity.

Olivier5
 
  3  
Thu 18 Jan, 2018 12:17 pm
@maxdancona,
Interesting survey data from YouGov and the Economist:

https://cdn.static-economist.com/sites/default/files/imagecache/640-width/20171125_WOC925_0.png
maxdancona
 
  2  
Thu 18 Jan, 2018 12:23 pm
@Olivier5,
I would love to see the genders switched on that. What percentage of people would consider it sexual harassment if a woman put her hand on a man's lower back?

The way that commenting on attractiveness has become verboten among young people in the US is interesting.
Olivier5
 
  2  
Thu 18 Jan, 2018 12:40 pm
@maxdancona,
Yes, the moderates are taking a severe beating. Think the Montagnards getting rid of the Girondins in the French revolution, the Bolsheviks eliminating the Mensheviks in the Russian one, etc. A process of accelerated radicalisation by way of eliminating the moderates. This being the 21st century, they are just risking their reputation, not their life (as yet).
0 Replies
 
ehBeth
 
  1  
Thu 18 Jan, 2018 12:56 pm
@Olivier5,
Quite a generational difference on several of those.

The biggest gender difference across the countries seems to be 'looking at breasts'

___

It would be interesting to see time changes (v age).
0 Replies
 
ehBeth
 
  1  
Thu 18 Jan, 2018 01:07 pm
@Olivier5,
https://today.yougov.com/news/2017/11/17/sexual-harassment-reports-may-just-be-tip-iceberg/


https://d25d2506sfb94s.cloudfront.net/cumulus_uploads/inlineimage/2017-11-16/11-17%20Harassment%202.png


this really speaks to the re-evaluation process some older women are going through


https://yougov.co.uk/news/2017/11/01/sexual-harassment-how-genders-and-generations-see-/


the pdf has the raw #'s, including m/f results

https://d25d2506sfb94s.cloudfront.net/cumulus_uploads/document/6use40wjdi/SexualHarassment_Oct17.pdf
0 Replies
 
Olivier5
 
  1  
Thu 18 Jan, 2018 01:07 pm
@maxdancona,
Also, age plays a more significant and consistant role than nation. France and the US are surprisingly close...
0 Replies
 
ehBeth
 
  1  
Thu 18 Jan, 2018 01:18 pm
http://www.refinery29.uk/2018/01/188234/me-too-baby-boomer-millennial-conversation-condoleezza-rice

Quote:

Brenda Russell, professor of applied psychology at Penn State-Berks, a baby boomer who has studied sexual harassment for 30 years, says her early research indicates that boomers often declined to report sexual harassment or rape. The term sexual harassment itself wasn't coined until 1975, and not widely discussed until 1991, the year Anita Hill testified against U.S. Supreme Court nominee Clarence Thomas.


"How many in our generation would never report harassment because, to some extent, it was expected, and you just dealt with it," she tells Refinery29. "If women did report, they were considered overly sensitive, a problem to be dealt with, or a liar."
Olivier5
 
  1  
Thu 18 Jan, 2018 02:56 pm
Let's hear some modern day romance:

The Virgins - One Week of Danger
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=qxfIJDXW8pI
0 Replies
 
Olivier5
 
  2  
Thu 18 Jan, 2018 04:10 pm
Quote:
After #MeToo, phone app allows you to legally consent to sex

LONDON (THOMSON REUTERS FOUNDATION) - A Dutch startup is launching an app which will allow people to give legal consent to sex via their mobile in an initiative spurred by Sweden's plans to bolster its rape law.

The LegalFling app, which lets users set out which practices they are and are not comfortable with, records sexual consent in a legally binding agreement. [...]

The app's creators said they came up with the idea as a practical response to Sweden's proposal to introduce legislation requiring explicit consent for sexual contact later this year.

The launch - due in three weeks - comes amid heated public debate over issues around consent triggered by the #MeToo social media campaign against sexual harassment and assault which has seen a slew of allegations against Hollywood stars.

The app uses blockchain, the technology behind the cryptocurrency bitcoin, making it impossible for anyone to tamper with the agreement.

Users can stipulate sexual dos and don'ts as well as rules on the use of condoms, disclosure of sexually transmitted diseases and the taking of photos and videos. The app allows both parties to agree on a penalty if footage is shared.

Acts of revenge porn if the relationship broke down would be a breach of contract and easy to take to court, the developers say.

The idea of such an app was ridiculed by actress Catherine Deneuve and other French women in a recent open letter which said the #MeToo campaign had gone too far and Sweden's plans "bordered on ridiculous".

"Next thing you know, two adults wanting to sleep together will have to specify beforehand, via an app... which practices they do and don't consent to," they wrote, apparently unaware of LegalFling. [...]

http://www.straitstimes.com/world/europe/after-metoo-phone-app-allows-you-to-legally-consent-to-sex
maxdancona
 
  2  
Thu 18 Jan, 2018 04:14 pm
@ehBeth,
A surprising number of older women (27%) said they were "flattered" when a man wolf whistled at her. Only 23% of women over 55 thought that whistling at a woman was inappropriate (the remaining said it was an acceptable practice or had no strong feelings.

That really surprised me. Women in previous generations didn't just tolerate this behavior. Many of them appreciated it. Times they are a changing. (For the record, I would never feel comfortable whistling at a woman with whom I wasn't already intimate).

I am also surprised by number, 45%, of younger women (18-24) think that winking is inappropriate. I would wink at a woman in a club or a bar if I thought it was in good fun. Lucky for me, 24 year olds no longer even interest me.

0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

 
  1. Forums
  2. » Me Too
  3. » Page 27
Copyright © 2025 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.08 seconds on 02/03/2025 at 12:54:07