Pure nonsense, and not in the least as clever an argument as you believe it to be.
If you want to thank me for something that is actually the case in your mind only, I guess I'll politely respond "You're welcome and you're full of it."
You still haven't answered me though as respects to why you find the HRC bashing of Lash and Max to be so infuriating. I'll happily bash her every chance I get and the opportunity has been given to me to do so by at least two threads, that I know of, in which she is the central figure for discussion. However, the two of them seem to be getting much more attention, on this score, from folks like you, maporche and Cyclo, than I am, which leads me to believe you all feel that they are some sort of apostates who are spouting heresy and hurting the cause
I rarely bring her up in other threads, but, again, I will happily join in and criticize her when someone else does, and of course, I won't stop just because someone wants everyone to focus on the evil President Plump
. I've no interest in engaging any further in debates concerning the nature and extent of her corruption. The facts speak for themselves but they are, not surprisingly, telling us each different tales. It's pointless to argue in circles.
As for the allegations of Trump colluding with the Russians to fix
the election, you're right, my attention span for that subject is rather short, but it's because there is nothing new being said; not because I have any fear of what might be the truth. If he's guilty we'll find out soon enough (and the sooner the better) but if you enjoy rehashing the allegations on a daily basis, knock yourself out, just don't tell or suggest
to other people what they can and cannot write here. It's perfectly clear that the left-wingers Lash and max are not welcome in the Clique, but why? They both abhor Trump and that's just about all the political discussion in this forum is about anymore, so what's the problem? Why are they the subjects of ridiculous accusations of working as Russian or GOP operatives? Why are they subjected to pretty nasty insults about their veracity, their integrity and, in Lash's case, even the supposed effect of her hormone levels? The only conclusion I can reach is that neither of them is, at all, fond of Hillary Clinton and that this is intolerable to you folks.
Their joining you in lambasting Trump doesn't seem to garner any credit with you and your friends. I would have expected the attitude to be something like "Well, we disagree about HRC, but we all hate Trump and are united on the most important issue" Obviously though that's not the case and if they are bored by incessant Trump bashing and want to discuss Clinton, you guys are just not going to be happy and won't leave it alone.
I think it's bullshit to argue that Clinton can't be discussed in the main
Anti-Trump thread, but can see a shred of validity to base it on, but this thread isn't interfering with your endless repetition about what a monster he is and how anyone who doesn't agree with your assessment is either a monster as well or a stupid dupe. So why the need to come here and slap max's hand?
You say it's not trying to control discussion here, but it sure seems that way to me so maybe you can do a better job of explaining yourself than repeating your goofy argument about the relative number of posts we've all written.
If you don't want to, that's fine too.