spendius wrote:No don't.I downgrade stuff from people who die young.
she was too free, it seems
Quote:Spendius - so much for Alexander the Great, then!
Thanks Helen. I needed help.
Thanks for the link Helen. I'll buy that book. Did you know this about Feynman? I didn't. Interesting...
Quote:My brother, Carl, was born in 1962, and I was adopted in 1968.
I have just been informed that an American fat-cat has purchased Manchester United football club.That is the sort of thing we get when our elite philosophers spend their time discussing what wines and cheeses to requisition.
Buck Pal could be next.
I'm sad for your loss. But I'll go with the wine and cheese.......if they're good that is.
Lola:-
What was that stuff your mate posted all about?I read it through a couple of times and it still remains drivel.I couldn't see what the guy was trying to say and I don't know why he feels the need to tell us all he was adopted.
Alexander the whatsit has had a very good write up which doesn't take me in even slightly.The joint folded is all I know and we won't be doing that because we are too smart.Dylan advised "Open The Door Homer" so I read it.A bunch of clunkers.
Hadn't even got digital TV.
Don't read Salammbo if you are a romantic.Well-not if you want to keep it up I mean.Mario Praz dealt with that for one.
spendius wrote:Lola:-
What was that stuff your mate posted all about?I read it through a couple of times and it still remains drivel.I couldn't see what the guy was trying to say and I don't know why he feels the need to tell us all he was adopted.
Alexander the whatsit has had a very good write up which doesn't take me in even slightly.The joint folded is all I know and we won't be doing that because we are too smart.Dylan advised "Open The Door Homer" so I read it.A bunch of clunkers.
Hadn't even got digital TV.
Don't read Salammbo if you are a romantic.Well-not if you want to keep it up I mean.Mario Praz dealt with that for one.
I expect no amount of realism to interfere with my romantism.......Emily Bronte didn't either.
Lola:-
That's a moot point.
What did the photo signify?Was it a Bandung Conference Spoonerism joke.
It's a Rubens......Daniel in the Lions Den
I was just joking.
Lola:-
I had another joke in mind about "Dan".What was your joke.We could both be smiling at different jokes.Not that it matters as long as we are smiling.
How about Salammbo?
spendius wrote:Lola:-
I had another joke in mind about "Dan".What was your joke.We could both be smiling at different jokes.Not that it matters as long as we are smiling.
How about Salammbo?
I've got to write my article first. Then I'll get to it.
I've forgotten now. Maybe just that he didn't look relaxed or lazy, just scared. But somehow it doesn't seem funny to me anymore.
Lola:-
There's gremlins in the kit.
Back tomorrow.
Be joyful.
I wonder what Andromeda did to deserve this........too much freedom maybe? Or perhaps she's missed too many appointments with her personal trainer.
Lola:-
I docked the cursor where X marks the spot,left clicked and nothing happened.
To deserve what?
sorry for your disapointment, Spendi. That Rubens was obsessed with something. It appears to be guilt feelings about sexual wishes. But I could be wrong.
Lola:-
I think you could very well be wrong.But I could be wrong too.There is no way of telling.There is just speculation and that says something about the speculator.
Freud thought so too. And I agree.
