gav wrote:Ticomaya wrote:
One man's "terrorist" is another man's "freedom fighter," eh gav?
Ticomaya, I say fair play to you lad!. You are the first person I have come across in this forum to recognise that. If only a few more people were "sensitive" enough to realise this, this forum could possibly answer more questions than it poses.
I don't "recognize" it in the sense that I agree with it. But that was basically Arafat's message to the UN in 1974.
In defining terrorism, and thus a terrorist, we must separate the means from the ends. The entire Muslim world may believe that the Palestinian ends are legitimate, and they will never be convinced otherwise. But no matter how much Palestinians might deserve independence, it does not justify murdering Israeli teenagers in restaurants, buses, and shopping malls. Arafat believed the ends justified the means of terrorism. He was a terrorist. He deserves nothing but contempt.