1
   

Wisconsin School OKs Creationism Teaching

 
 
Walter Hinteler
 
  1  
Reply Thu 2 Dec, 2004 02:06 pm
Piffka wrote:
see Catholic Encyclopedia: http://www.newadvent.org/cathen/05654a.htm


You know that the work on the Encyclopedia was begun in January, 1905, and it was completed in April, 1914 .... and is now online in that nearly 90 years old version?
0 Replies
 
Piffka
 
  1  
Reply Thu 2 Dec, 2004 02:20 pm
Walter Hinteler wrote:
Piffka wrote:
see Catholic Encyclopedia: http://www.newadvent.org/cathen/05654a.htm


You know that the work on the Encyclopedia was begun in January, 1905, and it was completed in April, 1914 .... and is now online in that nearly 90 years old version?


Does it matter? It only shows that ninety years ago Catholics accepted Evolutionary theory. And in my R.E. classes from just a few years ago, I know they still do.

"Though frightened for a moment by evolution, the Christian now perceives that what it offers him is nothing but a magnificent means of feeling more at one with God." Teilhard de Chardin
0 Replies
 
Bibliophile the BibleGuru
 
  1  
Reply Thu 2 Dec, 2004 02:35 pm
So as not to hijack Phoenix's thread, I've started a new thread entitled: "Evolution - Who wants to know?"

Please check it out > http://www.able2know.com/forums/viewtopic.php?p=1044540#1044540

============================

Phoenix: apologies for usurping this thread on you.
0 Replies
 
Walter Hinteler
 
  1  
Reply Thu 2 Dec, 2004 02:36 pm
Exactly, that's what I wanted to say: 90 years ago, evolution was taught e.g. in Catholic schools (I've the leson plans from my grandmother [private nuns school], which prove this.).
0 Replies
 
Piffka
 
  1  
Reply Thu 2 Dec, 2004 04:05 pm
Walter Hinteler wrote:
Exactly, that's what I wanted to say: 90 years ago, evolution was taught e.g. in Catholic schools (I've the leson plans from my grandmother [private nuns school], which prove this.).


That is very cool, Walter!
0 Replies
 
farmerman
 
  1  
Reply Thu 2 Dec, 2004 07:37 pm
As a student of the Catholic edu-indoctrination system, the original concept was called "Special Evolution" until vatican II. then Catholics fully rejected the concept of what we now call "Intelligent Design". Catholic geologists of the Christian Brotthers were beginning the dialogues with the environmental geologists regarding the rapidly changing environments through earths history.
hey CI, with a family grouping like that, you guys need a security Council.

I was busy today joining a work group of the PA state colleges Chapter of AAUP. The association is planning to become a party to the anti evolution program begun att DOVER pA High School.
0 Replies
 
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Reply Thu 2 Dec, 2004 07:40 pm
So, farmerman, what did you say at the meeting to change everybody's mind about anti-evolution?
0 Replies
 
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Reply Thu 2 Dec, 2004 07:43 pm
We atheists don't believe in soul, but there's enough in the area of psychology and psychosis to keep us busy for a very long time. Wink
0 Replies
 
farmerman
 
  1  
Reply Thu 2 Dec, 2004 08:02 pm
well, ci, lets just say that a number of groups are planning to join the fray. The ICS (INst Creation SCi) is sorta behind the activity thatt has substituted a general biology text with "of pandas and people" The copies of whhich were funded outtside the schools purchasing procedures. These guys have broken a number of state laws and a whole load of ed policies. Its gonna be a prottracted series of hearings and lawyering
Itll be mean and testy but all witthin the confines of the law.

I sat and just listened today. When things happen, Ill be sure to post links ,thats the best Ill be able to do. I hope you understand
0 Replies
 
Piffka
 
  1  
Reply Thu 2 Dec, 2004 08:38 pm
The Association of University Presses are becoming a party to the program? Good. I hope somebody other than Religious Fundamentalists starts running for their school boards, too.

Here's an idea...
Quote:
There is no creator. "The doctrine that the world was created is ill-advised and should be rejected." No single being exists who could create the world. How could an immaterial god create a material earth? "Uncreated and indestructible, it [the universe] endures under the compulsion of its own nature, divided into three sections - hell, earth and heaven."


That's what the Jain's believe according to this website.
0 Replies
 
ebrown p
 
  1  
Reply Thu 2 Dec, 2004 10:08 pm
This is a somewhat related story...

Quote:

HUNTSVILLE, Ala. -- NASA engineers and mathematicians in this high-tech city are stunned and infuriated after the Alabama state legistature narrowly passed a law yesterday redefining pi, a mathematical constant used in the aerospace industry. The bill to change the value of pi to exactly three was introduced without fanfare by Leonard Lee Lawson (R, Crossville), and rapidly gained support after a letter-writing campaign by members of the Solomon Society, a traditional values group. Governor Guy Hunt says he will sign it into law on Wednesday.

The law took the state's engineering community by surprise. "It would have been nice if they had consulted with someone who actually uses pi," said Marshall Bergman, a manager at the Ballistic Missile Defense Organization. According to Bergman, pi is a Greek letter that signifies the ratio of the circumference of a circle to its diameter. It is often used by engineers to calculate missile trajectories.

Prof. Kim Johanson, a mathematician from University of Alabama, said that pi is a universal constant, and cannot arbitrarily be changed by lawmakers. Johanson explained that pi is an irrational number, which means that it has an infinite number of digits after the decimal point and can never be known exactly. Nevertheless, she said, pi is precisly defined by mathematics to be "3.14159, plus as many more digits as you have time to calculate".

"I think that it is the mathematicians that are being irrational, and it is time for them to admit it," said Lawson. "The Bible very clearly says in I Kings 7:23 that the alter font of Solomon's Temple was ten cubits across and thirty cubits in diameter, and that it was round in compass."

Lawson called into question the usefulness of any number that cannot be calculated exactly, and suggested that never knowing the exact answer could harm students' self-esteem. "We need to return to some absolutes in our society," he said, "the Bible does not say that the font was thirty-something cubits. Plain reading says thirty cubits. Period."

Science supports Lawson, explains Russell Humbleys, a propulsion technician at the Marshall Spaceflight Center who testified in support of the bill before the legislature in Mongtomery on Monday. "Pi is merely an artifact of Euclidean geometry." Humbleys is working on a theory which he says will prove that pi is determined by the geometry of three-dimensional space, which is assumed by physicists to be "isotropic", or the same in all directions.

"There are other geometries, and pi is different in every one of them," says Humbleys. Scientists have arbitrarily assumed that space is Euclidean, he says. He points out that a circle drawn on a spherical surface has a different value for the ratio of circumfence to diameter.

"Anyone with a compass, flexible ruler, and globe can see for themselves," suggests Humbleys, "its not exactly rocket science."

Roger Learned, a Solomon Society member who was in Montgomery to support the bill, agrees. He said that pi is nothing more than an assumption by the mathematicians and engineers who were there to argue against the bill. "These nabobs waltzed into the capital with an arrogance that was breathtaking," Learned said. "Their prefatorial deficit resulted in a polemical stance at absolute contraposition to the legislature's puissance."

Some education experts believe that the legislation will affect the way math is taught to Alabama's children. One member of the state school board, Lily Ponja, is anxious to get the new value of pi into the state's math textbooks, but thinks that the old value should be retained as an alternative. She said, "As far as I am concerned, the value of pi is only a theory, and we should be open to all interpretations." She looks forward to students having the freedom to decide for themselves what value pi should have.

Robert S. Dietz, a professor at Arizona State University who has followed the controversy, wrote that this is not the first time a state legislature has attempted to redifine the value of pi. A legislator in the state of Indiana unsuccessfully attempted to have that state set the value of pi to three. According to Dietz, the lawmaker was exasperated by the calculations of a mathematician who carried pi to four hundred decimal places and still could not achieve a rational number. Many experts are warning that this is just the beginning of a national battle over pi between traditional values supporters and the technical elite.

Solomon Society member Lawson agrees. "We just want to return pi to its traditional value," he said, "which, according to the Bible, is three."
0 Replies
 
littlek
 
  1  
Reply Thu 2 Dec, 2004 10:10 pm
That has to be a joke!
0 Replies
 
dyslexia
 
  1  
Reply Thu 2 Dec, 2004 10:34 pm
the term "law of science" takes on a new meaning. Reagan had no tax increases because he had revenue enhancements, which seems to be the same sort of logic. I may have to vote republican next time because I would like the law of gravity to be repealed.
0 Replies
 
timberlandko
 
  1  
Reply Thu 2 Dec, 2004 11:20 pm
As I recall, the value of pi has been calculated to something like 500 Billion digits. Dunno why anybody'd wanna do that - other than to say they've got the record.
0 Replies
 
Mr Stillwater
 
  1  
Reply Thu 2 Dec, 2004 11:24 pm
Next week it will be "Kansas Legislature Repeals 2nd Law of Thermodynamics".
0 Replies
 
kickycan
 
  1  
Reply Thu 2 Dec, 2004 11:50 pm
It's all blue potatoes to me.
0 Replies
 
InfraBlue
 
  1  
Reply Fri 3 Dec, 2004 01:38 am
So, what's the value for the ratio of circumference to diameter of a circle drawn on a spherical surface, or does it vary?
0 Replies
 
timberlandko
 
  1  
Reply Fri 3 Dec, 2004 02:30 am
InfraBlue wrote:
So, what's the value for the ratio of circumference to diameter of a circle drawn on a spherical surface, or does it vary?

Assuming a perfect circle drawn on the surface of a perfect sphere, that would be 4 • π • (r²)
where π is the ratio of circumference to diameter of a circle, 3.14159... etc. (pi) to whatever precision you wish, and r is the radius of the sphere on which the circle is described. The only independent variable would be the desired precison of pi.
0 Replies
 
InfraBlue
 
  1  
Reply Fri 3 Dec, 2004 02:32 am
So, Humbleys in that article was talking out of his ass?
0 Replies
 
timberlandko
 
  1  
Reply Fri 3 Dec, 2004 02:35 am
The way I learned geometry he is.

Edit to add a second thought - Euclidian Geometry holds to the formula - or "Law" - that I posted. Theoretical geometries, which Humbleys appears to be referencing, can pretty much have any laws one wishes to incorporate into the theory one is playin' with. Euclidian Geometry, on the other hand, isn't sunject to gameplay - though the play of many games adheres to Euclidian Geometry - billiards being a prime example.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

T'Pring is Dead - Discussion by Brandon9000
Another Calif. shooting spree: 4 dead - Discussion by Lustig Andrei
Before you criticize the media - Discussion by Robert Gentel
Fatal Baloon Accident - Discussion by 33export
The Day Ferguson Cops Were Caught in a Bloody Lie - Discussion by bobsal u1553115
Robin Williams is dead - Discussion by Butrflynet
Amanda Knox - Discussion by JTT
 
Copyright © 2025 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.27 seconds on 02/08/2025 at 07:21:20