Foxfyre wrote:You have to ask clearly defined questions in order to get a clearly defined answer. Otherwise people are going to answer what they think you asked.
Yeah I asked about the whole kaboozle - the GOP, your administration, President. "Any specific policy/proposal or action of the Republican Party or the administration" you would criticize.
When from your answer I gathered that the criticism you outlined in it referred specifically to the GOP in Congress, I thought to ask specifically also what there might be you'd also hold against the President and his administration.
With "administration", I meant his Cabinet - the people he appointed as his government of the country (isn't that what's usually meant by "the [Smith] administration"?).
I consider the question answered, dont worry - just explaining.
Lola, I gotta admit that
Lola wrote:It's not Bush that's doing anything. And there's very little that is honest or sincere about him. The extremists in your party are driving us crazy because of the utter audacity with which they have dismembered our representative government
strikes me as just rhetorics as well, and I'm on your side... It's "true" to you, parts of it may even be true to me, but without any argument it is just rhetorics - unsubstantiated, flourishful assertions.
Also, I'm sure you'll recognize, when you come back, that the kind of reasoning that goes, "saying this kind of thing is only irresponsible if it's not true, but since what I said is true, it's not" would, indeed, like Thomas said, fit perfectly in your thread ... hey, with that line anyone can fend off arguments: "it's just
true, so there!" :wink:
