thomas
That piece IS funny indeed. I think nimh is a wee bit off on this as well.
Reading george and fox's notions of what the dems ought to do has been a continuing source of fun for me. For example, a central notion that keeps popping up is that the modern Republican party simply possesses superior ideas, and that the proof of this thesis is the ballot box. Of course, this argument entails that Democrat ideas were superior ideas from 1992 through 2000. Or through all periods where Democrats held majorities in both houses...a conclusion I think unlikely fox and george would maintain.
If not ideas, then what? That require an analysis of what else the Republicans have been doing (and what the dems have not been doing, or doing less of, or doing less effectively) to increase their power and electoral gains (there isn't, in my experience on this board, a single Republican who actually seems to understand this history).
Unfortunately, equally slow to the mark on this have been most dems. Whether they'll be able to catch up within less than a generation is not clear.
As to the Intelligent Design movement, it's principles and its funding and its strategies, the following is a good short education...
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A32444-2005Mar13.html?sub=AR