2
   

Was Pres.Bush Involved in 9/11 Attacks?

Forums: Politics, Conspiracies
Email this Topic • Print this Page
 
 
Ticomaya
 
  1  
Reply Fri 22 Oct, 2004 12:37 pm
Dookiestix wrote:

Quote:
If that were the case, then the guys on the carriers at Okinawa and the phillipines should have been able to save a few of the Japanese kamikaze planes as souvenirs. Where are they?



What kind of a bizarre anology is that?


It appears he's suggesting that airplanes tend to break up when they smash into solid things at high speeds.
0 Replies
 
cannistershot
 
  1  
Reply Fri 22 Oct, 2004 12:38 pm
Dookiestix wrote:
Quote:
If that were the case, then the guys on the carriers at Okinawa and the phillipines should have been able to save a few of the Japanese kamikaze planes as souvenirs. Where are they?


What kind of a bizarre anology is that?



It is as believable as anything else that I have read in this thread.
0 Replies
 
gungasnake
 
  1  
Reply Fri 22 Oct, 2004 12:40 pm
Ticomaya wrote:
Dookiestix wrote:

Quote:
If that were the case, then the guys on the carriers at Okinawa and the phillipines should have been able to save a few of the Japanese kamikaze planes as souvenirs. Where are they?



What kind of a bizarre anology is that?


It appears he's suggesting that airplanes tend to break up when they smash into solid things at high speeds.


glad somebody gets it....
0 Replies
 
Dookiestix
 
  1  
Reply Fri 22 Oct, 2004 12:54 pm
Plane wreckage tends to sink to the bottom of the ocean. There are thousands of intact planes sitting at the bottom of the ocean from our wars. Planes "breaking up" isn't the same as the presumed near complete disintegration of the 757 that slammed into the Pentagon.

It seems nobody is getting this. We're talking about presumably ONE plane hitting the pentagon.

I ask again, what kind of bizarre anology is that?
0 Replies
 
Ticomaya
 
  1  
Reply Fri 22 Oct, 2004 01:04 pm
Yes, you got it. One plane hit the pentagon.


Next question?
0 Replies
 
McGentrix
 
  1  
Reply Fri 22 Oct, 2004 01:13 pm
It must be the kind that you just don't understand.
0 Replies
 
Magus
 
  1  
Reply Fri 22 Oct, 2004 01:20 pm
two or three pages back, a photo was provided of the Pentagon Impact location.
Super-imposed on the photo was a silhouette (in red) of an airplane... but I'm not so sure that the scale of the plane relative to the Pentagon was quite accurate.
In the photo, one can see a 4'X8' sheet of plywood which provides us with a dependable scale reference.
The (published by Boeing) wingspan of 124 feet should have damaged more of the face of the building than is evident.
The two wing engines, which are located approximately 48 feet apart, would have wrecked a larger area on the face of the building as well... and the fuel in the wing tanks would have splashed/atomized all over the face of the building, fueling flames of which there is no apparent evidence in the photo.

The evidence just does not seem to support the assertions/allegations.
0 Replies
 
cannistershot
 
  1  
Reply Fri 22 Oct, 2004 01:25 pm
Magus wrote:
two or three pages back, a photo was provided of the Pentagon Impact location.
Super-imposed on the photo was a silhouette (in red) of an airplane... but I'm not so sure that the scale of the plane relative to the Pentagon was quite accurate.
In the photo, one can see a 4'X8' sheet of plywood which provides us with a dependable scale reference.
The (published by Boeing) wingspan of 124 feet should have damaged more of the face of the building than is evident.
The two wing engines, which are located approximately 48 feet apart, would have wrecked a larger area on the face of the building as well... and the fuel in the wing tanks would have splashed/atomized all over the face of the building, fueling flames of which there is no apparent evidence in the photo.

The evidence just does not seem to support the assertions/allegations.



Then what was it. I think that the space ship from Roswell is missing.....it runs off of water.
0 Replies
 
Magus
 
  1  
Reply Fri 22 Oct, 2004 01:30 pm
What was it?

look up "red herring"...
0 Replies
 
cannistershot
 
  1  
Reply Fri 22 Oct, 2004 01:35 pm
Magus wrote:
What was it?

look up "red herring"...

I did a goole search for red herring but all I could find was sites on Kerrys military service..... so is that what hit?
0 Replies
 
Dookiestix
 
  1  
Reply Fri 22 Oct, 2004 01:35 pm
Quote:
Yes, you got it. One plane hit the pentagon.


Great. Now tell that to gungasnake.
0 Replies
 
McGentrix
 
  1  
Reply Fri 22 Oct, 2004 01:40 pm
cannistershot wrote:
Magus wrote:
What was it?

look up "red herring"...

I did a goole search for red herring but all I could find was sites on Kerrys military service..... so is that what hit?


Laughing Laughing
0 Replies
 
Dookiestix
 
  1  
Reply Fri 22 Oct, 2004 01:44 pm
Quote:
I did a goole search for red herring but all I could find was sites on Kerrys military service.


hmm.... Perhaps if you did a "google" search, you'd get these hits instead:

http://www.redherring.com/

http://www.redherringproductions.com/

http://www.redherringpuppets.com/
0 Replies
 
cannistershot
 
  1  
Reply Fri 22 Oct, 2004 01:45 pm
Dookiestix wrote:
Quote:
I did a goole search for red herring but all I could find was sites on Kerrys military service.


hmm.... Perhaps if you did a "google" search, you'd get these hits instead:

http://www.redherring.com/

http://www.redherringproductions.com/

http://www.redherringpuppets.com/


Dangit I always leave that extra g out.....crappy liberal college.
0 Replies
 
Ticomaya
 
  1  
Reply Fri 22 Oct, 2004 01:47 pm
Dookiestix wrote:
Quote:
I did a goole search for red herring but all I could find was sites on Kerrys military service.


hmm.... Perhaps if you did a "google" search, you'd get these hits instead:

http://www.redherring.com/

http://www.redherringproductions.com/

http://www.redherringpuppets.com/


Nope. Cannister's was way funnier (even with Google misspelled) Laughing
0 Replies
 
cannistershot
 
  1  
Reply Fri 22 Oct, 2004 01:47 pm
Dookiestix wrote:
Quote:
I did a goole search for red herring but all I could find was sites on Kerrys military service.


hmm.... Perhaps if you did a "google" search, you'd get these hits instead:

http://www.redherring.com/

http://www.redherringproductions.com/

http://www.redherringpuppets.com/[/quote
I like the last link the best. It was all started by the muppets....
0 Replies
 
Dookiestix
 
  1  
Reply Fri 22 Oct, 2004 01:48 pm
cannistershot:

Quote:
Dangit I always leave that extra g out.....crappy liberal college.


No, sounds more like another child left behind.
0 Replies
 
cannistershot
 
  1  
Reply Fri 22 Oct, 2004 01:52 pm
Dookiestix wrote:
cannistershot:

Quote:
Dangit I always leave that extra g out.....crappy liberal college.


No, sounds more like another child left behind.


Embarrassed
0 Replies
 
dlowan
 
  1  
Reply Sat 23 Oct, 2004 04:15 am
Dookiestix wrote:
And let's keep in mind that the 9/11 commission was as politically driven as just about everything else in this country, so the complete truth can never be revealed (IMO).


So NOT having a commission would have been evidence, and then HAVING one is evidence, too???

I suggest you examine your theories, and work out what evidence would falsify them - (in line with rational investigation and scientific inquiry) - my prediction is that NOTHING would!

This is the hallmark of conspiracy theories - that there is no way out of them. Any contrary evidence is ignored (as you have signally ignored those who have posted evidence - like having SEEN the plane!!!!) on this thread - or, even less rationally, evidence against the theory is absorbed into it as evidence FORit - (as with the 9/11 commission - have you read it, since you accuse it of such political bias?)

Such theories are like snakes endlessly swallowing themselves - they feed on their own substance.
0 Replies
 
dlowan
 
  1  
Reply Sat 23 Oct, 2004 04:17 am
This is spooky.

I am on the same side as McGentrix.

Now the rapture's gonna come, isn't it?
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
AMERICAN CONSERVATISM IN 2008 AND BEYOND - Discussion by Foxfyre
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
Fellow Bostonians: How many of us wished we had an assault weapon last night? - Question by maxdancona
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
What should be first on the agenda of the winner in November? - Discussion by Frank Apisa
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
  1. Forums
  2. » Was Pres.Bush Involved in 9/11 Attacks?
  3. » Page 4
Copyright © 2025 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.03 seconds on 02/05/2025 at 08:59:17
▲ ▼