Was Pres.Bush Involved in 9/11 Attacks?

I still would like to know why there was hardly ANY wreckage from a 757 found at the Pentagon on 9/11

...as well as why the F.B.I. conviscated all the recording devices from various gas stations and corner markets that filmed the attack.

Why did they cover the lawn so fast?

Why do many eye witness reports indicate that it was a much smaller plane that flew into the Pentagon and in a section that was going through a restoration.

There are SO many questions yet to be answered. Why haven't we heard from any of these witnesses on national television?

And just WHY haven't the Bush cabal not filed a counter suit against Mr. Hilton?

The Snopes report answered all the questions I had.

That's interesting, as there are SO many questions yet to be answered. It seems as though partisanship has limited your scope of inquiry.

How clever of the Boeing 757 to contract itself
to half its length and then simply vanish.

not a structural engineer, but I'm sure there is an explanation for this phenomenon.

Why didn't he act surprised, or even a little bit upset? Guilt? Confusion? Something un-presidential, at any rate.

Stanley G. Hilton has filed a class action lawsuit in Federal court in Northern California against against high officials in the current Bush administration (including the federal government, Bush, Cheney, Rice, Mueller, Tenet, Rumsfeld, Ashcroft), for complicity in aiding and abetting and facilitating the Sep. 11, 2001 attacks.

His suit contends, and we strongly concur, that the defendants did so in order to launch unconstitutional aggressive war against the sovereign states of Afghanistan and Iraq, declare political opponents "enemy combatants," suspend the Constitution indefinitely, etc., all for sordid political ends which subvert the very system of laws and Constitution the defendants have sworn to uphold in their offices.

The suit alleges that Bush, as President, violated the US Constitution by deliberately lying to - and defrauding - the US Congress into passing an "Enabling Act" resolution in October 2002, authorizing Bush to wage aggressive war on Iraq. The war is unconstitutional and an illegal drain on the US taxpayers' funds in the treasury. The suit alleges the Iraq war is unconstitutional and that declaratory and injunctive relief should be ordered. It is unconstitutional and illegal because the president violated the Separation of Powers provisions of the Constitution by deliberately lying to the Congress by falsely assuring them that Bush had evidence of weapons of mass destruction (WMD) in Iraq, and that Iraq was involved in plotting and carrying out the 9/11 terrorist attacks on the World Trade center TwinTowers and the PentagonAttack - attacks actually orchestrated by defendants. The suit also alleges that the USA PatriotAct I and PatriotAct2 are unconstitutional and must be struck down as such, because they violate the fourth, fifth, ninth and first amendments to the US Constitution, by permitting the government to spy on Americans and violate their rights to privacy, and because the Patriot Acts, like the war in Iraq, were passed under false and fraudulent circumstances presented by defendants to the Congress.

The suit argues that to the extent that the US Constitution is legally analogous to a "contract" between the government and the plaintiffs (taxpayers), it seems that deliberate fraud by defendants should nullify any unconstitutional acts by them, such as the aggressive war and occupation of Iraq and the Patriot Acts.

The Plaintiffs believe they have the right to bring this suit as American citizens and that they face an imminent threat to their freedom from defendants, arising out of the entire orchestrated scenario of 9/11, the PA laws that were passed as a proximate result of 9/11, and the actions of defendants in infringing on their constitutionally guaranteed freedoms.

911review.org strongly supports Stanley Hilton's courageous actions to hold the officials responsible for the 9/11 massacres liable to punishment, and to repeal the FraudulentLegislation such as the PatriotAct.

Hilton is persisting in this legal action despite threats to his life and we call on all our readers to support his actions by all means necessary. Please donate generously to the 911VictimsLegalFund.



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------




Stanley Hilton's Lawsuit Documented

I think you conspiracy theorists need to figure out which is the real conspiracy here ...

Or is the conspiracy theory cleverly all made up to hide a much more heinous conspiracy theory?

Why are we discussing this? It was a 757, all right.

The important question is, did GWB and people close to him know it was due?

If you see the film Fahrenheit 911, you will see GWBs reaction when he was told the news- or rather you won't, because he had no reaction.

Why didn't he act surprised, or even a little bit upset? Guilt? Confusion? Something un-presidential, at any rate. I think he already knew.

How clever of the Boeing 757 to contract itself
to half its length and then simply vanish.

Dookiestix wrote:

How clever of the Boeing 757 to contract itself
to half its length and then simply vanish.

You're claiming airplanes should be able to hit granite walls at 300 mph and remain intact?

If that were the case, then the guys on the carriers at Okinawa and the phillipines should have been able to save a few of the Japanese kamikaze planes as souvenirs. Where are they?

If that were the case, then the guys on the carriers at Okinawa and the phillipines should have been able to save a few of the Japanese kamikaze planes as souvenirs. Where are they?