0
   

Actual cause of the American revolution

 
 
Reply Mon 30 Jan, 2017 11:46 pm
http://www.no-debts.com/anti-federalist/files/ownmoney.txt

The idea of anybody ever fighting a war over a tax on tea is a sort of a fairytale...

Quote:

http://www.algaoaktree.com/Franklin.htm
Read this amazing historical story your teachers never taught you....

(Much of the following historical material is taken from a radio
address given a half century ago by the late Congressman Charles G.
Binderup, of Nebraska, and compiled by Mrs. Lucie Boulrice, 1133
Liberty, Springfield, MA 01104. For more information, you may write or
call her at (413) 737-3080.

How America created its own money in 1750

Benjamin Franklin tells what made New England prosperous
____________________________

Colonies were more prosperous than the home country

Before the Declaration of Independence (1776) and the war that
followed, the colonized part of what is today the United States of
America was a Crown possession of England. It was called New England,
and was made up of 13 colonies, which became the original states of the
great Republic.

In 1750, this New England was very prosperous. Benjamin Franklin wrote:
"There was abundance in the Colonies, and peace reigned on every
border. It was difficult, even impossible, to find a happier and more
prosperous nation on all the surface of the globe. Comfort prevailed in
every home. The people, in general, kept the highest moral standards,
and education was widely spread."

When Franklin went over to England to represent the interests of the
Colonies, he saw a completely different situation; the working
population of the home country was gnawed by hunger and plagued by
inescapable poverty. "The streets are covered with beggars and tramps,"
he wrote. He asked his English friends how England, with all its
wealth, could have so much poverty among its working classes. His
friends replied that England was prey to a terrible condition; it had
too many workers! The rich said they were already overburdened with
taxes, and could not pay more to relieve the needs and poverty of this
great mass of workers. Several rich Englishmen of that time actually
believed what economist Thomas Malthus later wrote, that wars and
epidemic disease were necessary to rid the country from "manpower
surpluses."

People in London asked Franklin how the American Colonies managed to
collect enough money to support their poorhouses, and how they could
overcome this plague of unemployment and pauperism.

Thanks to debt-free money issued by the colonial governments

Franklin replied; "We have no poorhouses in the Colonies, and if we had
some, there would be no one to put in them, since in the Colonies there
is not a single unemployed person, not a beggar nor a tramp."

His friends could not believe their ears, or understand how this could
be. They knew when the English poorhouses and jails became too
cluttered, England shipped the wretched inmates like cattle, to be
dumped on the quays of the Colonies if they survived the filth and
privations of the sea voyage. (In those days English debtors went to
jail if they could not pay their debts, and few escaped, since in jail
they could not earn money.)

Franklin's acquaintences, in view of all this, asked him how he could
explain the remarkable prosperity of the New England Colonies.

Franklin told them: "Why, that is simple! In the Colonies, we issue our
own paper money. It's called 'Colonial Scrip.' We issue it to pay the
government's approved expenses and charities. We make sure it's issued
in proper proportion to make the goods pass easily from the producers
to the consumers. In other words, we make sure there is always adequate
money in circulation for the needs of the economy.

"In this manner, by creating ourselves our own paper money, we control
its purchasing power, and we have no interest to pay, to anyone. You
see, a legitimate government can both spend and lend money into
circulation, while banks can only lend significant amounts of their
promissory bank notes, for they can neither give away nor spend but a
tiny fraction of the money the people need. Thus, when your bankers
here in England place money in circulation, there is always a debt
principal to be returned and usury to be paid. The result is that you
have always too little credit in circulation to give the workers full
employment. You do not have too many workers, you have too little money
in circulation, and that which circulates, all bears the endless burden
of unpayable debt and usury."

English Bankers impose poverty on the Colonies

Franklin should not have been so free with his advice, which soon came
to the attention of the powerful English Bankers. They quickly used
their influence to have the British Parliament pass a law that
prohibited the Colonies from using their Colonial Scrip money. The new
law ordered them to use only credit redeemable in gold and silver coins
that were provided in insufficient quantity by the banks of England.
And so began in America the plague of debt-based money, which has ever
since brought as many hardships to the American people, as it has to
Europeans.

The first law regulating Colonial money was passed by the British
Parliament 1751, then expanded by a more restrictive law in 1763.

Franklin reported that only one year after implementation of the
prohibition on Colonial Scrip, the streets of the Colonies were filled
with unemployed and beggars, just like those he had seen in England,
because there was not enough money to pay for their goods and work. The
English Banker's new laws had reduced the circulating medium by half.

Franklin added that this was "the original and true cause of the
American Revolution;" and not the tax on tea or the Stamp Act, as has
been taught our children for generations in "history" books. The
Financiers (bankers) of every generation manage to have removed from
school books any information that can throw light on their own schemes
and fraudulent actions that protect their power over the people.

Franklin, one of the chief architects of American independence, put it
clearly: "The Colonies would gladly have borne the little tax on tea
and other matters had it not been for the poverty created by the bad
influence of the English Bankers on the Parliament, which has caused in
the Colonies hatred of England and the Revolutionary War."

Other great statesmen of that era, including Thomas Jefferson, John
Adams, and George Jackson confirmed this point of view held by
Franklin; and later by Andrew Jackson and Martin Van Buren. Abraham
Lincoln and John Kennedy both issued sovereign money, James Garfield
tried, and all three died in office.

A remarkably honest English historian, John Twells, speaking of the
money of the Colonies, their Colonial Scrip, wrote: "It was the
monetary system under which America's Colonies flourished to such an
extent that Edmund Burke was able to write about them: 'Nothing in the
history of the world resembles their progress. It was a sound and
beneficial system, and its effects led to the happiness of the people.'
"

John Twells added: "In a bad hour, the British Parliament took away
from America its own scrip money, forbade any further issue of such
bills of credit, these bills ceasing to be legal tender, and ordered
that all taxes should be paid in British coins. Consider now the
consequences: this restriction of the medium of exchange paralyzed all
the industrial energies of the people. Ruin took place in these once
flourishing Colonies; most rigorous distress visited every family and
every business, discontent became desperation, and reached a point, to
use the words of Dr. Johnson, when human nature rises up and asserts
its rights."

Another historical writer, Peter Cooper, expressed himself along the
same lines. After saying how Franklin had explained to members of
Parliament the reason for the prosperity of the Colonies, Cooper wrote:
"After Franklin gave explanations on the true cause of the prosperity
of the Colonies, the Parliament enacted laws forbidding the use of this
money in the payment of taxes. This decree, clearly in the interest of
the British bankers who stood behind the Crown, brought so many
drawbacks and so much poverty to the people that it was the main cause
of the Revolution. The supression of the Colonial money was a much more
important reason for the general uprising than the Tea and Stamp Acts."

DANGER! The Scrip of the Bankers has Taken over America

Today, in America as well as in Europe, we are under the regime of the
Scrip of the Bankers instead of the scrip of the sovereign nations.
Hence the enormous public debts, everlasting interest (usury) charges,
taxes that plunder purchasing power and rob the production of the
people, with the result being more and more consolidation of the
financial dictatorship.

Where shall we start to correct the fraud of the bankers?

The first step in the monetary reform being advocated by more and more
action groups of educated and intelligent people is precisely the
replacement of the banks' debt money by debt-free money issued by the
Constitutionally mandated sovereign government of the nation, the
United States Congress, and elsewhere, the British Parliament, and
similar governments. It is the duty of those governments to serve and
protect their people, not allow financial robber barons to destroy them.

We must end the dictatorship of the moneyed interests!

It will soon become clear to you that we need to abolish the Federal
Reserve Banking System as a privately owned central bank controlled
partly by foreign interests. Check clearing must be taken over by the
U. S. Treasury Department, and the commercial banks of our system must
no longer be permitted to create and issue debt money by fractional
reserve deposit expansion. A debt money system never provides money to
pay interest, so the banks ultimately acquire all the People's property
by foreclosure, as Thomas Jefferson said they would. Learn more. Study
this go-oaktree site until you begin to grasp the essentials of our
money problem. Learn the truth, before it is too late. Find out how you
can help yourself and your nation. Download these flyers and circulate
them via copy machines to friends who do not have Internet access.
 
farmerman
 
  3  
Reply Tue 31 Jan, 2017 05:48 am
@gungasnake,
So the French and Indian WARS (there were 4 of em ) , which depleted coffers of Englqnd and France had nothing to do with anything.
Im glad you can come up with these "Gunga truths" that settle and correct what weve all been told in Catholic SChool.

The thing about :fake news" is that it purports to b the entire truth that noon bfore ever thought of. Now i youd take som of those bits from your fake news source, youd find they fit within a more complex history of the times that happened in the 100 years before the Revolution or the peiod since the "Beaver Wars" "The War of Jenkins Ear" or the 1st 2nd ,3rd, of the Frendh and Indian WARS (plural) and the last, (the 7 Years War , or what we in the US call the French and INDIAN WAR (not plural)
0 Replies
 
Thomas33
 
  -1  
Reply Tue 31 Jan, 2017 09:15 am
Actual cause was just resentment of power. People don't want to be controlled, which of course has to mean that another revolution takes place - global revolution.
0 Replies
 
ehBeth
 
  2  
Reply Tue 31 Jan, 2017 09:17 am
@gungasnake,
More fake news.

Consider actually learning the facts. The real facts.
0 Replies
 
gungasnake
 
  0  
Reply Tue 31 Jan, 2017 09:19 am
The only person in the universe with any plausible claim to omniscience is God. Farmerman is an imposter and a poser...
farmerman
 
  1  
Reply Tue 31 Jan, 2017 09:53 am
@gungasnake,
Quote:
Farmerman is an imposter and a poser..
"When losing an argument always go for insult and depreciatory titles"

0 Replies
 
gungasnake
 
  1  
Reply Thu 2 Feb, 2017 04:21 am
The same thing holds for all professional skeptics including ¨Snopes¨ and guys like Michael Shirmer. Claiming to have the base of knowledge to debunk every new idea that ever comes down the highway is basically a claim of omniscience.

Snopes for instance claims that the infamous story about Uncle Don Carney in NY in the early days of radio is an urban legend. My father once told me he heard the thing on the air as it happened. In fact he told me that he didn´t listen to Uncle Don but that his sister did and that he had gone into the house to ask his sister about something or other and caught the thing just by dumb luck.
0 Replies
 
Brandon9000
 
  0  
Reply Thu 2 Feb, 2017 05:25 am
There's more than enough historical data to know the reasons for the American Revolution and everyone who has studied the history knows the reasons. Americans were generally annoyed at being treated like 2nd class citizens. Britain instituted a number of tax laws in America over the years, all of which then had to be rescinded because of protests in America. Finally, they issued the tax on tea. The Americans, specifically the Sons of Liberty, protested by dumping the tea in Boston harbor. The British responded by issuing the Intolerable Acts, including the Boston Port Act, which shut down the port of Boston. The Americans resented a distant country claiming the right to create laws and taxes for them and maintained that these should come from their own legislatures. This kept escalating until the killings at Lexington started the Revolutionary War. Yes, the taxes were a big part. The idea that anything is still in dispute about this is very ignorant indeed.
farmerman
 
  1  
Reply Thu 2 Feb, 2017 09:51 am
@Brandon9000,
Gunga calls others"professional skeptics" When I have NEVER seen him in agreement with anything science has evidenced.
Actually, hes not a skeptic, hes a DENIER
0 Replies
 
gungasnake
 
  0  
Reply Thu 2 Feb, 2017 10:04 pm
@Brandon9000,

Take your pick:

https://www.google.com/search?client=opera&q=ben+franklin++cause+of+the+revolutionary+war+script&sourceid=opera&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8
Brandon9000
 
  0  
Reply Fri 3 Feb, 2017 04:20 am
@gungasnake,

This has been studied by historians for centuries and the causes are not in dispute. Only someone unfamiliar with the subject would think that he is revealing an unappreciated truth.
0 Replies
 
farmerman
 
  1  
Reply Fri 3 Feb, 2017 05:53 am
@gungasnake,
Quote:

Franklin replied; "We have no poorhouses in the Colonies, and if we had
some, there would be no one to put in them, since in the Colonies there
is not a single unemployed person, not a beggar nor a tramp."
Now you know that this is counter what history teaches us. Weve got the remnants of many debtors prisons, poorhouses and almhouses all over.

Prhaps Frnklin was , in part, being sardonic in his claims regarding the requirements that debts owed to Britain be paid in pound sterling.

I can see that the web site where you sourced much of this could have you believe their posts by sounding authoritative as a purveyor of historical "fact" because they are an "ECONOMIC PREPPER" site where theyre hawking gold and silver . ANY kind of news of calamity tc would make their sales pitch much simpler for "clar minds" like yours.

Alternative History is often loaded with opinions and "facts", many of which are individually true.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

HAPPY ANNIVERSARY, EVERYONE! - Discussion by OmSigDAVID
WIND AND WATER - Discussion by Setanta
Who ordered the construction of the Berlin Wall? - Discussion by Walter Hinteler
True version of Vlad Dracula, 15'th century - Discussion by gungasnake
ONE SMALL STEP . . . - Discussion by Setanta
History of Gun Control - Discussion by gungasnake
Where did our notion of a 'scholar' come from? - Discussion by TuringEquivalent
 
  1. Forums
  2. » Actual cause of the American revolution
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.05 seconds on 04/19/2024 at 08:57:33