1
   

200,000 Votes Disqualified in Florida!

 
 
dlowan
 
  1  
Reply Tue 19 Oct, 2004 03:04 pm
Cycloptichorn wrote:
Quote:
It is a matter of personal pride for me. Very citizen should believe their nation is the greatest, else they should move to the country they think is.

To answer your question Dlowan, the best country in the world is the one lucky enough to have ME as a citizen.


What a typically arrogant, American answer.

Perhaps you could, I don't know, look at things objectively? Perhaps people don't always have the ability (or desire?) to jump up and move to another country, even if they aren't thrilled with their own?

Your answer shows how much Nationalism has taken over in America.... it's not a good thing...

Cycloptichorn


Hmmmm - well, to be fair to McG, I think that last comment of his was a joke.
0 Replies
 
Larry434
 
  1  
Reply Tue 19 Oct, 2004 03:04 pm
We fight all crime in the U.S. But despite our best efforts, crimes still occur.

So, yes, we have to "accept" that preventing crime is not 100% effective.
0 Replies
 
dlowan
 
  1  
Reply Tue 19 Oct, 2004 03:05 pm
Cycloptichorn wrote:
Hey, I grew up in Texas. You don't have to explain the concept of pride to me; it's our bread and butter.

But Nationalism has very bad consequences when it becomes the ideology of one's nation... when it drives one's foriegn policies... when one loses the ability to judge one's actions objectively because of a deep-seated belief that they are the 'best' and are not subject to outside judgement...

That is EXACTLY what has happened here in America, and one of the primary reasons the rest of the world has problems with us.

Perhaps a little more objectivity would remind my fellow countrymen that while we do have a lot of great things going for us, there is no god-given mandate for America; there is no more probability that our nation will become dominant (or even survive) than there has been any other nation in the past; to believe so is folly, and will lead down the same road as the other nations which believed that they, too, were supreme and therefore their actions were just by definition.

Cycloptichorn


Hmmm - well, yes - the USA is a little egregious in its national pride thing - but it is no orphan.
0 Replies
 
dlowan
 
  1  
Reply Tue 19 Oct, 2004 03:07 pm
Larry434 wrote:
We fight all crime in the U.S. But despite our best efforts, crimes still occur.

So, yes, we have to "accept" that preventing crime is not 100% effective.


We are not talking about crime in general - we are talking about electoral fraud.
0 Replies
 
Larry434
 
  1  
Reply Tue 19 Oct, 2004 03:11 pm
dlowan wrote:
Larry434 wrote:
We fight all crime in the U.S. But despite our best efforts, crimes still occur.

So, yes, we have to "accept" that preventing crime is not 100% effective.


We are not talking about crime in general - we are talking about electoral fraud.


I know. The same statement can be applied to that specific crime. Like all crime, we must accept that the best attempts to curtail it will not be 100% effective, so some voter fraud will continue to exist.
0 Replies
 
dlowan
 
  1  
Reply Tue 19 Oct, 2004 03:33 pm
So - the short answer would be - you don't know why the US tolerates it?
0 Replies
 
Larry434
 
  1  
Reply Tue 19 Oct, 2004 03:41 pm
dlowan wrote:
So - the short answer would be - you don't know why the US tolerates it?


No. We do not "tolerate" any crime, voter fraud or any other. But we are realistic enough to know that crime will continue to some degree, no matter how vigorous the law enforcment and crime prevention activities. We have to "accept" that prevention will not be 100% effective.

I do not know a clearer way to express that proven fact.
0 Replies
 
dlowan
 
  1  
Reply Tue 19 Oct, 2004 03:42 pm
Actually - you have piqued my interest now - and I am googling it - we had an outbreak of it in Queensland a few years ago - actually as part of "branch-stacking" (getting mass sign-ups for Labor Party sub-branches, so as to get particular people elected as delegates to party decision making conferences) rather than as an end in itself - ie people have to be on the electoral rolls in order to be members of sub-branches. So the intent was not to have people vote in elections fraudulently, but to affect party policy.

People went to prison over it.
0 Replies
 
Piffka
 
  1  
Reply Tue 19 Oct, 2004 04:22 pm
Walter Hinteler wrote:
Seems, I'm out here.

My experience, and that of 80 million Germans plus some hundred million persons more worldwide, is that everyone, how says: 'Germany is the greatest' is a Nazi.

And it (unfortunately) was and is proved: that's correct.


Walter -- it is sad to say that the USA is becoming as fascist as any country during WW2. Small voices such as ours are being drowned out in a sea of nationalistic fervor by self-appointed religious crusaders.
0 Replies
 
McGentrix
 
  1  
Reply Tue 19 Oct, 2004 05:06 pm
Piffka wrote:
Walter Hinteler wrote:
Seems, I'm out here.

My experience, and that of 80 million Germans plus some hundred million persons more worldwide, is that everyone, how says: 'Germany is the greatest' is a Nazi.

And it (unfortunately) was and is proved: that's correct.


Walter -- it is sad to say that the USA is becoming as fascist as any country during WW2. Small voices such as ours are being drowned out in a sea of nationalistic fervor by self-appointed religious crusaders.


That's a lot of haorse puckey Piffka. The country is no more facist now than it was in 1776. The only thing different is the noise those not in office make.
0 Replies
 
Platypus
 
  1  
Reply Wed 20 Oct, 2004 06:28 am
Larry434 wrote:
No. We do not "tolerate" any crime, voter fraud or any other. But we are realistic enough to know that crime will continue to some degree, no matter how vigorous the law enforcment and crime prevention activities. We have to "accept" that prevention will not be 100% effective.

...and yet Kerry gets lambasted for saying exactly the same thing about terrorism (his "nuisance" comment). Smells like a double standard to me.
0 Replies
 
Larry434
 
  1  
Reply Wed 20 Oct, 2004 06:46 am
Platypus wrote:
Larry434 wrote:
No. We do not "tolerate" any crime, voter fraud or any other. But we are realistic enough to know that crime will continue to some degree, no matter how vigorous the law enforcment and crime prevention activities. We have to "accept" that prevention will not be 100% effective.

...and yet Kerry gets lambasted for saying exactly the same thing about terrorism (his "nuisance" comment). Smells like a double standard to me.


Welcome to the fray, platypus.

Accepting that crime prevention will never be 100% effective, and calling crime a "nuisance" are two quite different things.
0 Replies
 
Platypus
 
  1  
Reply Wed 20 Oct, 2004 07:35 am
Larry434 wrote:
Accepting that crime prevention will never be 100% effective, and calling crime a "nuisance" are two quite different things.

Yes, they are, which is why it's so annoying that Kerry made the equivalent of one statement about terrorism and gets lambasted for the equivalent of the other. He didn't say terrorism is a nuisance, but that reducing it to that level was a goal.
Quote:
We have to get back to the place we were, where terrorists are not the focus of our lives but they're a nuisance

That statement includes a tacit admission that reducing terrorism to a nuisance is the best we can hope for, and is thus quite comparable to your statement about crime. In an "eye for an eye" world, this is where I'd attack you for not wanting to eliminate crime entirely, but I don't think that would be very constructive.
0 Replies
 
Larry434
 
  1  
Reply Wed 20 Oct, 2004 07:50 am
"...this is where I'd attack you for not wanting to eliminate crime entirely, but I don't think that would be very constructive."

Nothing would make me any happier if that was a practical possibiliy.

But you have to know it isn't. Or do you?
0 Replies
 
Piffka
 
  1  
Reply Wed 20 Oct, 2004 02:10 pm
McGentrix wrote:
Piffka wrote:
Walter Hinteler wrote:
Seems, I'm out here.

My experience, and that of 80 million Germans plus some hundred million persons more worldwide, is that everyone, how says: 'Germany is the greatest' is a Nazi.

And it (unfortunately) was and is proved: that's correct.


Walter -- it is sad to say that the USA is becoming as fascist as any country during WW2. Small voices such as ours are being drowned out in a sea of nationalistic fervor by self-appointed religious crusaders.


That's a lot of haorse puckey Piffka. The country is no more facist now than it was in 1776. The only thing different is the noise those not in office make.


Anyone can misspell rude words, McG... obviously you are quite adept at it.

As Umberto Eco says: Franklin Roosevelt's words of November 4, 1938, are worth recalling: "If American democracy ceases to move forward as a living force, seeking day and night by peaceful means to better the lot of our citizens, fascism will grow in strength in our land."

Eternal Fascism...

Fascism Anyone?
0 Replies
 
McGentrix
 
  1  
Reply Wed 20 Oct, 2004 02:28 pm
Piffka, The US is not now, nor has it ever been or will it ever become a fascist state. It doesn't matter how many false prophets claim it, no matter how many lonely historians wish it.
0 Replies
 
dlowan
 
  1  
Reply Wed 20 Oct, 2004 03:55 pm
Has anybody addressed the reality of this alleged 200,000 vote fraud?

If it is real, then I think it amazing, in a much vaunted superior deoocracy, that such a level is tolerated, with a simple, c'est la vie.
0 Replies
 
Larry434
 
  1  
Reply Wed 20 Oct, 2004 04:00 pm
dlowan wrote:
Has anybody addressed the reality of this alleged 200,000 vote fraud?

If it is real, then I think it amazing, in a much vaunted superior deoocracy, that such a level is tolerated, with a simple, c'est la vie.


It is a partisan projection, pure speculation, nothing more.
0 Replies
 
Lash
 
  1  
Reply Wed 20 Oct, 2004 04:16 pm
Walter Hinteler wrote:
Seems, I'm out here.

My experience, and that of 80 million Germans plus some hundred million persons more worldwide, is that everyone, how says: 'Germany is the greatest' is a Nazi.

And it (unfortunately) was and is proved: that's correct.


Absolutely crazy. There is quite a difference in feeling your country is the greatest and trying to take over the world. Never could figure out the Germans re this.

Germans can go about feeling and saying that their country is best... just keep your mits off of us.
0 Replies
 
Lash
 
  1  
Reply Wed 20 Oct, 2004 04:18 pm
<psst...Do what you want with France...>
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
Copyright © 2025 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.03 seconds on 02/10/2025 at 07:43:53