Larry434 wrote:Accepting that crime prevention will never be 100% effective, and calling crime a "nuisance" are two quite different things.
Yes, they are, which is why it's so annoying that Kerry made the equivalent of one statement about terrorism and gets lambasted for the equivalent of the other. He didn't say terrorism
is a nuisance, but that reducing it to that level was a
goal.
Quote:We have to get back to the place we were, where terrorists are not the focus of our lives but they're a nuisance
That statement includes a tacit admission that reducing terrorism to a nuisance is the best we can hope for, and is thus quite comparable to your statement about crime. In an "eye for an eye" world, this is where I'd attack you for not wanting to eliminate crime entirely, but I don't think that would be very constructive.