@Debra Law,
Great question, and I wish I had a good answer.
The cancerous tumor that has grown on our healthy and vital system needs to be destroyed. That is for certain.
The problem is that modest, incremental procedures to control and retard the cancer seem to have been entirely ineffective. It is spreading and reaching a point where the system is on the verge of dying. By taking more radical measures, we might kill the tumor but lose the patient.
In addition, while we all might agree on much of what ails the system: political careerism and corruption, crony capitalism, the strategy of division etc we don't agree on what symptoms might be a sign of worsening illness or the start of recovery, and we seem entirely unable to break free of the tribal instincts that nourish the tumor.
The latter is the gravest danger because unless it changes, efforts to combat the tumor will always be bifurcated. Each half of the populace will only want to cure
half of the tumor based on the perverse notion that the other half is either not really malignant or must be fed to combat the
truly harmful other half.
Somehow we need to suspend our ideological conflict and recognize the real danger is underlying corruption. Unless that corruption is rooted out it won't matter which ideology
wins, because it will inevitably lead to a victory that is merely a manifestation of the worst excesses of either ideology.
I've no clue on how that is accomplished and particularly because I haven't been able to personally do it.