monitoring Trump and relevant contemporary events

@Walter Hinteler,

Walter Hinteler wrote:

giujohn wrote:
I'm supposed to believe the reporter from the Atlantic who wasn't in the oval office ...

Well, there was just this Russian journalist (who took the official photos, too) ...
And the Russian foreign minister, and the Russian ambassador ...

Soooooo, they work for the Atlantic? O.o

Not sure what your point here is. They leaked the story?

0 Replies

@Olivier5,

Olivier5 wrote:

Anyone using "cheese head" or any other insult (eg "snowflakes") again and again and again must be a shithead. Try a little variety and creativity in your insults.

Shithead is rather vulgar. If we want to get vulgar in the name calling, let me know. I have quite a litany of vulgarity I hardly ever use.

1 Reply

@giujohn,

Quote:

So let me get this straight...I'm supposed to believe the reporter from the Atlantic who wasn't in the oval office and whose animus is ever so blatant, but disbelieve the NSA & the Sec. of State??? Nice try cheese head.

No one is disputing Trump disclosed classified information in the Russian meeting. Trump says he has a right to disclose anything he wants. McMaster is only needlessly pointing out Trump didn't disclose methods or future military plans of which no said he did.

1 Reply

@McGentrix,

The constant use of the same insults again and again is also vulgar, in the sense that it's for people without imagination or intelligence.

0 Replies

@giujohn,

Holy Crap, that is even worse. You read it and repeated it like a true believer. You're putty in the hands of stupid people.

0 Replies

@Olivier5,

You know you are asking people who can't think for themselves, that they should try to think? These boys aren't capable of anything close to that.

1 Reply

@glitterbag,

LOL... I must say that despite our hmm hmm... past issues, I have occasionally enjoyed some of your most outlandish posts. The trumpettes could learn a thing or two from you, in terms of insult creativity. :-)

0 Replies

McMasters just said the President didn't know how sensitive (how it was obtained) the information was that he blabbed to the Russians. That makes this even worse, because sensitive eyes only Intell in never handed to any President without a warning about how sensitive it is. In other words, someone told the president that it was sensitive but he didn't remember or worse, he didn't care.

0 Replies

Quote:

US President Donald Trump has defended his "absolute right" to share information with Russia, following a row over classified material.

Mr Trump tweeted that he had shared "facts pertaining to terrorism and airline safety" and wanted Russia to do more against so-called Islamic State.

He met Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov in the Oval Office last week.

US media said Mr Trump had shared material that was passed on by a partner which had not given permission.

A report in the Washington Post said Mr Trump had confided top secret information relating to an IS plot thought to centre on the use of laptop computers on aircraft.
In his tweets early on Tuesday, Mr Trump said: "As President I wanted to share with Russia (at an openly scheduled W.H. meeting) which I have the absolute right to do, facts pertaining to terrorism and airline flight safety.

"Humanitarian reasons, plus I want Russia to greatly step up their fight against [IS] & terrorism."

It is not clear if Mr Trump was acknowledging having shared intelligence secrets with the Russian officials, thus contradicting White House statements, or whether he was simply trying to explain what had been discussed.

I doubt he knows himself.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-39937258

0 Replies

@Olivier5,

Olivier5 wrote:

Anyone using "cheese head" or any other insult (eg "snowflakes") again and again and again must be a shithead. Try a little variety and creativity in your insults.

I guess your post confirms your status as a snowflake...how ironical huh?

1 Reply

@Walter Hinteler,

Walter Hinteler wrote:

giujohn wrote:
I'm supposed to believe the reporter from the Atlantic who wasn't in the oval office ...

Well, there was just this Russian journalist (who took the official photos, too) ...
And the Russian foreign minister, and the Russian ambassador ...

And you are I touch with them and have the real story, huh?

0 Replies

@giujohn,

giujohn wrote:

Olivier5 wrote:

Anyone using "cheese head" or any other insult (eg "snowflakes") again and again and again must be a shithead. Try a little variety and creativity in your insults.

I guess your post confirms your status as a snowflake...how ironical huh?

Wow, and your lame response proves Olivier5's premise. I've never seen anyone so eager to prove he is a 'shithead'. Must be those jelly donuts.

2 Replies

I would believe a journalist from a reputable news organisation over a bloody idiot stupid enough to lie about something where there is photographic evidence to the contrary.

2 Replies

@Walter Hinteler,

Walter Hinteler wrote:

Quote:

“For the purpose of transparency, the White House should share a transcript of the meeting....

Senate Minority Leader Charles E. Schumer (D-N.Y.) made the call on Tuesday morning.

“The White House should make the transcript of @POTUS’ mtg w/ the Russian Foreign Minister & Ambassador available to Intel Cmtes ASAP,” Schumer wrote on Twitter.

“Until the Admin provides the unedited transcript, American ppl will rightly doubt if POTUS can handle our nation’s most closely kept secrets,” he wrote.

Source

Heh, so now this super-sensitive should be made "transparent" so that "the people don't rightly doubt" Trump, eh?

Yeah, it's so damn sensitive that the whole world should know about it.

What a crock of ****.

0 Replies

@izzythepush,

Well, McMaster was just on TV and utterly debased himself.

0 Replies

@revelette1,

revelette1 wrote:

McMaster is only needlessly pointing out Trump didn't disclose methods or future military plans of which no said he did.

No matter how many times you cheese-eaters are confronted with the truth you will continue to assert your lies, eh?

As I've posted, McMaster said MUCH MORE than that, as did Tillerson and others (also posted).

They ALL say that the story published by Wapo is just plain FALSE.

2 Replies

@layman,

I don't get where revelette wrote the above quote. Might be another fake.

2 Replies

@Walter Hinteler,

Walter Hinteler wrote:

I don't get where revelette wrote the above quote. Might be another fake.

Come on now Walter. You know how links work.

https://able2know.org/topic/355218-961#post-6425352

0 Replies

@glitterbag,

glitterbag wrote:

I've never seen anyone so eager to prove he is a 'shithead'.

You must ignore your posts like most people do if your not seeing that.

0 Replies

Wapo tries to act like IT knows how to keep people from "inferring" who their sources are.

But they announce that some of this information came from FORMER government officials.

IF there were any in the room that would pretty much tell the world who their "source" is, or at least limit it to very few candidates.

If there were none, then apparently some illegal eavesdropping is STILL taking place, eh?

Of course the most probable "inference" about their sources is that they don't know **** about the meeting, and are just making up some lies.

Nice try, cheese-eaters.

0 Replies

monitoring Trump and relevant contemporary events

Related Topics

Quick Links

My Account

able2know